Barkley
Printable View
Barkley
So far it looks like this:
Charles Barkley - 10
Karl Malone - 10
Elgin Baylor - 7
Isiah Thomas - 6
Dirk Nowitzki - 5
Scottie Pippen - 1
David Robinson - 1
Rick Barry - 1
[QUOTE=IGotACoolStory][IMG]http://i.cdn.turner.com/si/multimedia/photo_gallery/0903/classic.ncaa.tourney.photos/images/001306336.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
mutombo?
[QUOTE=therammingman]mutombo?[/QUOTE]
[img]http://i.cdn.turner.com/sivault/si_online/covers/images/1981/0406_large.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=pauk][img]http://i.cdn.turner.com/sivault/si_online/covers/images/1981/0406_large.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
i know....
but his face looks the same as mutombo in that picture of him on the floor clutching the ball after nuggets upset sonics in playoffs
Charles Barkley
[QUOTE=pauk]So far it looks like this:
Charles Barkley - 10
Karl Malone - 10
Elgin Baylor - 7
Isiah Thomas - 6
Dirk Nowitzki - 5
Scottie Pippen - 1
David Robinson - 1
Rick Barry - 1[/QUOTE]
Barkley has 8, Baylor has 6. Remember the rule.
Edit: Barkley has 9 now.
[QUOTE=Round Mound][B]Ring Crap Again...:rolleyes: :facepalm
Then Russell > Jordan Right? :confusedshrug: :no:
Watch the Games and See Who is More Dominant. Barkley is the Most Dominant PF Ever[/B][/QUOTE]
Ring "crap" ?
So winning a championship is crap?
[QUOTE=Rojogaqu11]Barkley>Malone and Dirk
A single championship difference between Dirk and Barkley is not enough to forget all the failures [B]Dirk had with stacked teams[/B]. If a championship was enough to put him above Barkley and Malone, then what the heck are Bird and Wilt doing above Kobe, Shaq, and Duncan? Why isn't Bill Russell at least top 2 and Lebron almost top 10?? Then championships should help Robert Horry jump to at least top 50, right?
Championships are a great accomplishment that should be considered, but so are longevity, consistency, level of competition, rules and pace, skill-set and productivity, athleticism, health, and I would say that three other things should be considered in these type of evaluations: team-chemistry, character, and development or growth.
Because team-chemistry defines how a player was a factor not only during games statistically, but also how he exemplified leadership and promoted a winning mentality to others. Character defines the type of professional that a player strives to be, the type of effort a player gives on and off the court, almost like a visual measurement of a player's competitiveness. If a player fulfilled his potential, exceeded the expectations, and made the most out any situation in his career, then he grew into the best player he could possibly become, and that not only shows character, but straight up "love" for the game.[/QUOTE]
Dirk had stacked teams? :wtf:
This dude
[IMG]http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/basketball/nba/news/2001/03/08/sayitaintso_bulls/scottie_all.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=1987_Lakers]Charles Barkley[/QUOTE]
:applause: [B]Sadly We are Few that Saw Barkley Play When Healthy and Prime
Charles Barkley was the Master of the Inside the 3-Point Line Game.
The Best Mid Range and Post Game Among All PFs and Never a Ball Hogg Like Many Others:
21.6 PPG on 12.9 Two-Point FGAs PG and a Two-Point FG% of 58.13%
22.5 PPG on 14.5 Two-Point FGAs PG and a Two-Point FG% of 55.13%
[/B]
Dirk
Karl Malone!!!
He only had the second most points in NBA history.
The Mailman had a long and great career.
[QUOTE]Ring Crap Again..[/QUOTE]
:oldlol:
I don't know why you keep saying this and pull out the emoticons over and over again. As if everyone would just stop wanting to use rings in context for their arguments.
[QUOTE]Then Russell > Jordan Right?[/QUOTE]
I give you credit for not saying Robert Horry > Jordan, but hey, I'm cool with Russell > Jordan. Nothing absurd about it to me. :cheers:
[B][QUOTE][B]Sadly We are Few that Saw Barkley Play When Healthy and Prime
Charles Barkley was the Master of the Inside the 3-Point Line Game.
The Best Mid Range and Post Game Among All PFs and Never a Ball Hogg Like Many Others:
21.6 PPG on 12.9 Two-Point FGAs PG and a Two-Point FG% of 58.13%
22.5 PPG on 14.5 Two-Point FGAs PG and a Two-Point FG% of 55.13%[/B]
[/QUOTE][/B]
Had he not missed like a thousand 3s that might matter.