Tim Duncan is greater than Shaq, and here are the numbers to PROVE it

[QUOTE=D

[QUOTE=Borat]oh no.. a cartoon is giving me 'the bird'.

go shag a sheep thats wearing a Duncan mask[/QUOTE]

:applause:

Wow, this thread has been to mountain top, and seen the promised land.

[QUOTE=poeticism707]Please Don, don't speak of stupidity as though it were a vice and then subscribe to it. Shaq is not excused for his poor performance both in All NBA selections, as well All Defensive selections. The fact Shaq didn't perform well against his competition is evident. Of course his bickering with teammates, breaking up teams, poor conditioning, delaying surgery and missing chunks of the season, etc all contributed to his lack of dominance. Shaq gets the lion's share for winning, Shaq gets the lion's share for lack of dominance in winning and losing (as the numbers show). Maybe he could have accomplished mroe, but he has no one to blame but himself. Or would you penalize Duncan for Shaq's POTENTIAL, what he has not done? Once again, is stupidity at its ugliest.[/QUOTE]
:rolleyes:
[B][FONT="Franklin Gothic Medium"]
So just say your whole argument in 1 line. Duncan is better than Shaq becaue hs is a PF and Shaq is a C. Because thats all you have. Your main argument is Duncan's got more awards and that is the reason why he has more awards. Because Duncan is a PF and Shaq is a C. Not because Duncan is actually a better defender or player, but because he plays PF and Shaq plays C, and you and I both know that is why Duncan has more awards.


So with your main argument really being Duncan is a PF and O'Neal is a C, Don would say your main argument is very stupid

Don is done with this thread[/FONT][/B]

Is there a specific reason why all this Shaq VS Duncan talk started up? Or is it just a case people feel a need to compare everyone to everyone else.

shaq is a center.. duncans a forward

[QUOTE=El Kabong]Is there a specific reason why all this Shaq VS Duncan talk started up? Or is it just a case people feel a need to compare everyone to everyone else.[/QUOTE]
Who's know ... I'm about to start a Shaq O'Neal vs Jermaine O'Neal thread just for the hell of it.

[QUOTE=Borat]hey fool, Borat is an alias that I use occasionally to mock the fools like you on the board.[/QUOTE]

:oldlol: im really scared honestly i don't care who you are![IMG]http://emoticons4u.com/fingers/fing23.gif[/IMG]

[QUOTE=L.Kizzle]Who's know ... I'm about to start a Shaq O'Neal vs Jermaine O'Neal thread just for the hell of it.[/QUOTE]
Screw that, let's start a Mugsy Bogus VS Monute Bol thread.

[QUOTE=poeticism707]Tim Duncan is greater than Shaq and Olajuwaon, unless KG wins 3 titles soon, he isn't in the Equation.[/QUOTE]


I respectfully disagree

Olajuwon > Tim Duncan

other than that we :cheers:

[QUOTE=IBLEEDGREEN43]shaq is a center.. duncans a forward[/QUOTE]

WOw, way to state an argument that has been repeated over, and over, and over, without adding anything new to it.

:applause:

Here is a very enlightening Tim Duncan article...

[url]http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=simmons/070509[/url]

[QUOTE=EricForman]haha, finally Tim Duncan has a annoying, biased, homer, dumbass fan that Kobe and Dirk has so many of on this board.

poetcism is to Duncan what Eliteballer/konex/oneway is to Kobe, PleezeBelieve is to Lebron, and Glove20 is to GP, and Howard5Nowitzki41 is to Dirk.[/QUOTE]

...also known as "fans".

[QUOTE=bleedinpurpleTwo]...also known as "fans".[/QUOTE]

:applause:

You don't need awards to tell you that Shaq OBVIOUSLY plays lazy defense. That's a weak ass argument talkin bout "well what if Duncan play this position, etc," you'd have to be an absolute idiot approaching Don levels if you can't tell that Duncan gives great defensive effort, while Shaq gives less.

It doesn't take a genious to see that, one simply has to be MINIMALLY OBSERVANT.

:pimp: