Printable View
[QUOTE=Hawker]amuel l jackson better be getting paid a ****load of money for this movie.[/QUOTE]
He didn't read the script before he agreed to do it. He just liked the director and the title. The original director quit, and the title was almost changed. If this was called Pacific Air 131 or whatever it was going to be called, no one would watch it. No one would like it.
I'm looking forward to its parody film, 'Muslims on a Plane' which should be a lot more frightening.
[quote]The only way I'd go see that is if they rename it "****** Hustlin on a Court".[/quote]
HAHAHA
[quote]Anyone else caught Samuel L. Jackson on the Daily Show. It was seriously the funniest interview I have ever watched on the Show. Makes me almost wanna see the money.[/quote]
John Stewart gives a GREAT interview. Can make the most boring guy seem interesting. Too bad Colbert has to do all his interviews in character and they always end up being unpleasant cause I bet he could give a decent interview too.
To add to my theory:
How Stella Got her Groove Back.
U, Me and Dupree
All of the Star Wars movies
And if they'd have named Jurassic Park, "Steven Spielbergs: Real Looking Dinosaurs eating people" It would've made 10 Million more dollars. Book it.
JoeWait that is hilarious! Muslims on a plane, god damn send me to hell but that's freaking funny.
I am starting to dislike Colbert interviews because he ruined one I was interested in. He was talking to some comic book guy about the new Marvel series "civil war" and would rarely even let the guy finish a sentence. He would mock the guy and basically let no information about the series out from the dude's mouth.
And why do they say the Colbert Reporr? What did I miss?
[quote]I am starting to dislike Colbert interviews because he ruined one I was interested in. He was talking to some comic book guy about the new Marvel series "civil war" and would rarely even let the guy finish a sentence. He would mock the guy and basically let no information about the series out from the dude's mouth.[/quote]
Colbert's interviews suck. But know that he's acting. If you've watched Hannity or O'Reilly, they never let anybody finish their sentences, and all they do is mock everything they say and act like a total ass hole. And that's what Colbert does. So don't go into a Colbert Report interview expecting interesting information.
He leaves the actual information interviews to Stewart and his interviews are just to show how a right-wing, conceited talk show host would react to a certain person.
And he says "Reporr" to play off the t being silent in his name also.
Does Samuel L. Jackson scream profanities at a lot of people in this? If so, I'll go catch a screening. It's the little things that make me go see movies.
He actually doesn't scream a lot of profanities. Well not enough
GOBB, get a clue. If you don't see how THIS movie is different than a movie that's bad but is trying to be good, then you might just be the least intelligent poster on this message board, and we both know how bad that is.
[QUOTE=geeWiz15]Colbert's interviews suck. But know that he's acting. If you've watched Hannity or O'Reilly, they never let anybody finish their sentences, and all they do is mock everything they say and act like a total ass hole. And that's what Colbert does. So don't go into a Colbert Report interview expecting interesting information. [/QUOTE]
Colbert said he got the idea of how his character should be from a quote by Joe Scarborough. Basically, Joes said that he "isn't doing his job if he lets his guests speak for 7 seconds uninterupted."
You aren't spending 10 dollars to be entertained... you are paying 10 dollars to sit in a dark theater with a smug grin plastered across your face: "God, I am being so ironic right now... wait until I tell my friends (or it some cases, 'my board') how ironic I am."
Well worth it for some.
[QUOTE=Voice of Reason][URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TpsFVWu4L4"]Snakes on a MOFO plane! Woohoo! Vid, watch it! hahaa[/URL][/QUOTE]
:roll: The white guy with the beard pulling the Jamie Foxx got me.
Not in a good enough mood to get a kick out of it, so not this weekend at least. Kind of worn out on the hype for it too.
You can watch the interview of Sam L Jackson and John Stewart on youtube. I saw it there and couldnt stop laughing. Too bad it wasnt long.
[QUOTE]How Stella Got her Groove Back.
U, Me and Dupree
All of the Star Wars movies
And if they'd have named Jurassic Park, "Steven Spielbergs: Real Looking Dinosaurs eating people" It would've made 10 Million more dollars. Book it.[/QUOTE]
STar Wars movies werent bad at all. I didnt like the first two attack of the clones I & II (look i dont know thier names) but return of the jedi, empire strikes back and even the last movie where u saw how darth vader became darth vader (the ending how he was put together) were tight.
I admit i went to see star wars with that red/black character. Forgot his name but he was a villain all hyped up and lasted like 15 seconds in the movie getting sliced in half. That movie was long and stunk ass.
Jurrassic park was a book. So regardless of name title many people went to see it because the book was good. You cant use movies where a book came out and was made into a movie.
[QUOTE=Voice of Reason]
STar Wars movies werent bad at all.
Jurrassic park was a book. So regardless of name title many people went to see it because the book was good. You cant use movies where a book came out and was made into a movie.[/QUOTE]
Exactly, all movies that say whats going on in the movie are usually good.
If When a Stranger Calls had been renamed "When a Stranger Calls while Watching You" it would've some how found a way to be better
PS: I thought you got your username back GOBB