How come Pro-Palestine protesters are always young disheveled looking dorks??

[QUOTE=Baller234;14897697]Look at this sick, twisted fukk. Good god.

Yes 3tard, they were just retaliating. The beheaded infants had it coming. The raped women and children had it coming.

STOP. POSTING.[/QUOTE]
You seem to think the IDF raping women and killing babies is good so this is pretty ironic.

[QUOTE=Baller234;14897699]The SAME post.[/QUOTE]
This is what you always do. Show an inability to comprehend what I’m saying and then blame me for your stupidity. I didn’t say the retaliation was justified. Retaliation is defined as “returning a military attack”. The IDF is constantly causing violence in Gaza. It was a case of Hamas returning fire. Was it awful and unjustified? Yes very. But you keep trying to pretend they started the conflict or that Israel has zero responsibility for Hamas existing which is willfully ignorant at best.

[QUOTE=RRR3;14897702]This is what you always do. Show an inability to comprehend what I’m saying and then blame me for your stupidity. I didn’t say the retaliation was justified. Retaliation is defined as “returning a military attack”. The IDF is constantly causing violence in Gaza. It was a case of Hamas returning fire. Was it awful and unjustified? Yes very. But you keep trying to pretend they started the conflict or that Israel has zero responsibility for Hamas existing which is willfully ignorant at best.[/QUOTE]

Hey genius, if it's a [B]retaliation[/B]... that means it's justified.

It is wrong for me to attack you, but if you attack me first... then I am going to [B]retaliate[/B] against you and it would be [B]justified.[/B]

If you are referring to the attacks on 10/7 as a [B]retaliation[/B], that is you [B]justifying[/B] the attacks.

You DUMB fukk.

[QUOTE=RRR3;14897680]The funniest thing is him trying to use this to argue he cares about Jews when he’s frequently said antisemitic things about me and Jeff and has an alt account named after a Nazi paramilitary rank :oldlol:

Not to mention it’s antisemitic to argue Israel represents Jews in the first place. But this is the same idiot who thinks Iran represents all Muslims.[/QUOTE]

Think about it, this guy really sat down and decided that would be a great name for his alt account. I’ll just say the Nazi paramilitary rank account he has makes more sense now with his support for Israel

[QUOTE=Baller234;14897704]Hey genius, if it's a [B]retaliation[/B]... that means it's justified.

It is wrong for me to attack you, but if you attack me first... then I am going to [B]retaliate[/B] against you and it would be [B]justified.[/B]

If you are referring to the attacks on 10/7 as a [B]retaliation[/B], that is you [B]justifying[/B] the attacks.

You DUMB fukk.[/QUOTE]
I can’t believe I have to explain definitions to you like you’re a toddler over and over again.

[url]https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/retaliation#[/url]

[QUOTE]the act of hurting someone or doing something harmful to someone because they have done or said something harmful to you[/QUOTE]


Where does it say anything about justification? Are you trolling? because if not you’re like 3 years old mentally.

[QUOTE=Baller234;14897704]Hey genius, if it's a [B]retaliation[/B]... that means it's justified.

It is wrong for me to attack you, but if you attack me first... then I am going to [B]retaliate[/B] against you and it would be [B]justified.[/B]

If you are referring to the attacks on 10/7 as a [B]retaliation[/B], that is you [B]justifying[/B] the attacks.

You DUMB fukk.[/QUOTE]

Look how mad he is :roll::roll::roll:

HOLY **** WHAT A MELTDOWN :oldlol:

[QUOTE=SaltyMeatballs;14897705]Think about it, this guy really sat down and decided that would be a great name for his alt account. I’ll just say the Nazi paramilitary rank account he has makes more sense now with his support for Israel[/QUOTE]
Meanwhile bawler tried to justify it. But he cares about terrorism guys!

[QUOTE=SaltyMeatballs;14897707]Look how mad he is :roll::roll::roll:

HOLY **** WHAT A MELTDOWN :oldlol:[/QUOTE]
The little guy is so worked up he’s seconds away from bringing up trans women :yaohappy:

[QUOTE=RRR3;14897706]I can’t believe I have to explain definitions to you like you’re a toddler over and over again.

[url]https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/retaliation#[/url]




Where does it say anything about justification? Are you trolling? because if not you’re like 3 years old mentally.[/QUOTE]
[B]
the act of hurting someone or doing something harmful to someone because they have done or said something harmful to you [/B]

And in this case the "someone" is... dead infant babies???

This is your argument? That the dead infant babies did something awful to Hamas, so Hamas had to retaliate against the infant babies by chopping their heads off???


STOP. POSTING.

LOG. OFF.

You DUMB fukk.

[QUOTE=Baller234;14897711][B]
the act of hurting someone or doing something harmful to someone because they have done or said something harmful to you [/B]

And in this case the "someone" is... dead infant babies???

This is your argument? That the dead infant babies did something awful to Hamas, so Hamas had to retaliate against the infant babies by chopping their heads off???


STOP. POSTING.

LOG. OFF.

You DUMB fukk.[/QUOTE]
1. Israel has killed countless Palestinian children. You’ve never heard of the concept of an eye for an eye? Obviously it’s not justified but Hamas aren’t rational actors. They’re terrorists. Understanding what created this terrorist group is important though.

2. It’s been brought to your attention that the beheaded babies was potentially IDF propaganda. You ignored that link.

[QUOTE=Baller234;14897711][B]
the act of hurting someone or doing something harmful to someone because they have done or said something harmful to you [/B]

And in this case the "someone" is... dead infant babies???

This is your argument? That the dead infant babies did something awful to Hamas, so Hamas had to retaliate against the infant babies by chopping their heads off???


STOP. POSTING.

LOG. OFF.

You DUMB fukk.[/QUOTE]

RRR3 has you so riled up on this beautiful Saturday afternoon :roll:

This is ****ing hilarious and I’m here for it

[QUOTE=SaltyMeatballs;14897714]RRR3 has you so riled up on this beautiful Saturday afternoon :roll:

This is ****ing hilarious and I’m here for it[/QUOTE]
Bawler in 1645: we should Genocide Native Americans because a few of them slaughtered a village of colonists.

Dude literally doesn’t understand the conditions settler colonialism and genocide create and then gets mad at you for trying to explain basic political theory to him.

[QUOTE=RRR3;14897700]You seem to think the IDF raping women and killing babies is good so this is pretty ironic.[/QUOTE]

This is a lie. Whereas Muslims rape and throw gays such as yourself off rooftops every day.

Baller in here literally redefining words and phrases and acting like everyone else are the dumbasses for not knowing his interpretations. Retaliation just means a counterattack, it doesn’t specify if it has to be proportionate/justified or not. If you make fun of your boss’s hairline and he feels some sort of way, he can retaliate by getting you fired. It’s still retaliation, but not close to proportionate or justified.

[QUOTE=Patrick Chewing;14897742]This is a lie. Whereas Muslims rape and throw gays such as yourself off rooftops every day.[/QUOTE]
[url]https://amp.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/22/claims-of-israeli-sexual-assault-of-palestinian-women-are-credible-un-panel-says[/url]

[url]https://amp.theguardian.com/world/2024/apr/02/gaza-palestinian-children-killed-idf-israel-war[/url]


Are you just going to deny reality if you don’t like it?

[QUOTE=j3lademaster;14897745]Baller in here literally redefining words and phrases and acting like everyone else are the dumbasses for not knowing his interpretations. Retaliation just means a counterattack, it doesn’t specify if it has to be proportionate/justified or not. If you make fun of your boss’s hairline and he feels some sort of way, he can retaliate by getting you fired. It’s still retaliation, but not close to proportionate or justified.[/QUOTE]

that's all you have to say?

you mean you're choosing not to engage in this twelve page low-iq food fight?a

[QUOTE=j3lademaster;14897745]Baller in here literally redefining words and phrases and acting like everyone else are the dumbasses for not knowing his interpretations. Retaliation just means a counterattack, it doesn’t specify if it has to be proportionate/justified or not. If you make fun of your boss’s hairline and he feels some sort of way, he can retaliate by getting you fired. It’s still retaliation, but not close to proportionate or justified.[/QUOTE]
He’s pathologically unable to admit when he’s made a mistake or wrong. It’s incredibly disturbing.

[QUOTE=diamenz;14897749]that's all you have to say?

you mean you're choosing not to engage in this twelve page low-iq food fight?a[/QUOTE]
Love how you claim to be on the side of Palestinians but shiver in fear at the thought of challenging your far right buddies and *gasp* agreeing with me and Salty. Meanwhile you shriek with rage at everything anyone you perceive as left says.

[QUOTE=RRR3;14897751]Love how you claim to be on the side of Palestinians but shiver in fear at the thought of challenging your far right buddies and *gasp* agreeing with me and Salty. Meanwhile you shriek with rage at everything anyone you perceive as left says.[/QUOTE]

i just think you all are making yourselves look like idiots.

[QUOTE=RRR3;14897748][url]https://amp.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/22/claims-of-israeli-sexual-assault-of-palestinian-women-are-credible-un-panel-says[/url]

[url]https://amp.theguardian.com/world/2024/apr/02/gaza-palestinian-children-killed-idf-israel-war[/url]


Are you just going to deny reality if you don’t like it?[/QUOTE]

“Claims”

:roll:

[QUOTE=RRR3;14897751]Love how you claim to be on the side of Palestinians but shiver in fear at the thought of challenging your far right buddies and *gasp* agreeing with me and Salty. Meanwhile you shriek with rage at everything anyone you perceive as left says.[/QUOTE]

If you were on the side of the Palestinians, you would criticize Hamas. You would criticize them for building over 300 miles of tunnels underneath schools, hospitals, apartment buildings.

Hypocrite.

[QUOTE=diamenz;14897754]i just think you all are making yourselves look like idiots.[/QUOTE]
It would kill you take the lefts side on an issue :roll:

[QUOTE=Patrick Chewing;14897756]“Claims”

:roll:[/QUOTE]
So everything you don’t like is fake news but you uncritically believe the propaganda of Israel’s government?

As for your next post, I have said Hamas is bad many times in this thread. It’s really sad you’re so old your memory has begun to fail :(

Seems like the majority of the world is against Israel on this issue. It isn't just liberal dorks in America.

[QUOTE=1987_Lakers;14897771]Seems like the majority of the world is against Israel on this issue. It isn't just liberal dorks in America.[/QUOTE]

there's a lot of jews out there around the world that don't support the approach that israel is taking in this war. nor do a lot of them believe that the netanyahu administration is an accurate representation of them or good for the future of israel.

Pretty much everyone besides hardcore conservatives are against this.

[QUOTE=j3lademaster;14897745]Baller in here literally redefining words and phrases and acting like everyone else are the dumbasses for not knowing his interpretations. Retaliation just means a counterattack, it doesn’t specify if it has to be proportionate/justified or not. If you make fun of your boss’s hairline and he feels some sort of way, he can retaliate by getting you fired. It’s still retaliation, but not close to proportionate or justified.[/QUOTE]

Hey genius.

If you're going to frame something as a "retaliation", it implies that the action being taken is in return for a prior offense. Innocent civilians, by definition, have not participated in anything that could warrant retaliation. Therefore it's not retaliation when you target innocents who weren't complicit.

I've used this example before but I will be more than happy to use it again since you guys have such smooth brains and can't understand basic concepts.

In the film Braveheart, England's plan was to subjugate and assert dominion over the Scots. In their pursuit for freedom and independence, the Scots fought back. Unlike Hamas though, the violent actions the Scots took fell within the confines of warfare. We never see any civilians get attacked. We only see battles and conflicts that take place between the Scottish rebels and the English forces.

You want to know why there isn't a scene of Mel Gibson and the Scots beheading the English children and raping the English women? [B]Because that would make them the bad guys and the audience would lose sympathy. [/B]

Once you cross that line, it stops being a "retaliation" and becomes something else. Rational people understand the difference. Sick twisted fukks like you, Salty and 3tard do not apparently.

[QUOTE=Baller234;14897779]Hey genius.

If you're going to frame something as a "retaliation", it implies that the action being taken is in return for a prior offense. Innocent civilians, by definition, have not participated in anything that could warrant retaliation. Therefore it's not retaliation when you target innocents who weren't complicit.

I've used this example before but I will be more than happy to use it again since you guys have such smooth brains and can't understand basic concepts.

In the film Braveheart, England's plan was to subjugate and assert dominion over the Scots. In their pursuit for freedom and independence, the Scots fought back. Unlike Hamas though, the violent actions the Scots took fell within the confines of warfare. We never see any civilians get attacked. We only see battles and conflicts that take place between the Scottish rebels and the English forces.

You want to know why there isn't a scene of Mel Gibson and the Scots beheading the English children and raping the English women? [B]Because that would make them the bad guys and the audience would lose sympathy. [/B]

Once you cross that line, it stops being a "retaliation" and becomes something else. Rational people understand the difference. Sick twisted fukks like you, Salty and 3tard do not apparently.[/QUOTE]
Are you just going to continually ignore that IDF soldiers have raped Palestinian women and murdered babies?

[QUOTE=Baller234;14897779]Hey genius.

If you're going to frame something as a "retaliation", it implies that the action being taken is in return for a prior offense. Innocent civilians, by definition, have not participated in anything that could warrant retaliation. Therefore it's not retaliation when you target innocents who weren't complicit.

I've used this example before but I will be more than happy to use it again since you guys have such smooth brains and can't understand basic concepts.

In the film Braveheart, England's plan was to subjugate and assert dominion over the Scots. In their pursuit for freedom and independence, the Scots fought back. Unlike Hamas though, the violent actions the Scots took fell within the confines of warfare. We never see any civilians get attacked. We only see battles and conflicts that take place between the Scottish rebels and the English forces.

You want to know why there isn't a scene of Mel Gibson and the Scots beheading the English children and raping the English women? [B]Because that would make them the bad guys and the audience would lose sympathy. [/B]

Once you cross that line, it stops being a "retaliation" and becomes something else. Rational people understand the difference. Sick twisted fukks like you, Salty and 3tard do not apparently.[/QUOTE]

Bro are we really trying to make an analogy between a Hollywood narrative film with something that's actually real? I see the point you're going for but it's a bad one.

It almost proves the point I've always made about shaping things to be good guys vs bad guys and letting your narrative cloud your views. The director choosing not to show the Scots raping and pillaging villages doesn't mean that it didn't happen. Of course it did. Women and children suffer during war.

People across enemy lines being shown grace by families in films...is not how this shit goes.

Anybody taking IDF talking points as Gospel needs to reevaluate

[QUOTE=1987_Lakers;14897771]Seems like the majority of the world is against Israel on this issue. It isn't just liberal dorks in America.[/QUOTE]

Accurate

[QUOTE=RRR3;14897776]Pretty much everyone besides hardcore conservatives are against this.[/QUOTE]

Unfortunately there’s a lot here

[QUOTE=Baller234;14897779]Hey genius.

If you're going to frame something as a "retaliation", it implies that the action being taken is in return for a prior offense. Innocent civilians, by definition, have not participated in anything that could warrant retaliation. Therefore it's not retaliation when you target innocents who weren't complicit.

I've used this example before but I will be more than happy to use it again since you guys have such smooth brains and can't understand basic concepts.

In the film Braveheart, England's plan was to subjugate and assert dominion over the Scots. In their pursuit for freedom and independence, the Scots fought back. Unlike Hamas though, the violent actions the Scots took fell within the confines of warfare. We never see any civilians get attacked. We only see battles and conflicts that take place between the Scottish rebels and the English forces.

You want to know why there isn't a scene of Mel Gibson and the Scots beheading the English children and raping the English women? [B]Because that would make them the bad guys and the audience would lose sympathy. [/B]

Once you cross that line, it stops being a "retaliation" and becomes something else. Rational people understand the difference. Sick twisted fukks like you, Salty and 3tard do not apparently.[/QUOTE]

Apparently anyone who disagrees with this moron is a sick twisted **** with a smooth brain :oldlol:

Hey bud, you’re being disagreed with because your arguments and thought process are literally shit. It’s too bad you can’t see that

Poopsie is the worst advocate for Israel.

[QUOTE=SaltyMeatballs;14897791]Apparently anyone who disagrees with this moron is a sick twisted **** with a smooth brain :oldlol:

Hey bud, you’re being disagreed with because your arguments and thought process are literally shit. It’s too bad you can’t see that[/QUOTE]

This is a really bad faith interpretation of what I said and it's obvious you just want to misrepresent my argument.

I didn't say you were sick for disagreeing with me. I said you were sick if you can't acknowledge that the attacks on Oct 7th were evil and deliberate in their intent.

Your cheap deflection tactics aren't going to work here.

[QUOTE=ShawkFactory;14897784]Bro are we really trying to make an analogy between a Hollywood narrative film with something that's actually real? I see the point you're going for but it's a bad one.
[B]
It almost proves the point I've always made about shaping things to be good guys vs bad guys and letting your narrative cloud your views.[/B] The director choosing not to show the Scots raping and pillaging villages doesn't mean that it didn't happen. Of course it did. Women and children suffer during war.

People across enemy lines being shown grace by families in films...is not how this shit goes.[/QUOTE]

Salty and 3tard are both on record as having said that Israel are "the bad guys" in this situation. In 3tard's case, he was making this case literally the day of Oct 7th.

[QUOTE=diamenz;14897749]that's all you have to say?

you mean you're choosing not to engage in this twelve page low-iq food fight?a[/QUOTE]Did you know strawberries aren’t berries, but bananas are? Shit is crazy.

If you ever have to second guess which side you are on is the correct one just watch this

[video=youtube;q9y6sj98ZFM]https://youtu.be/q9y6sj98ZFM?si=Nyb40QVwEBth_bWB[/video]

ProPalestinians chanting "Death to Israel. Death to America" in the effin US by some people that we had the misguided decision to let into this country. Absolutely crazy.

These people are lucky I'm not president, I'd deport all foreign born Pro-Palestine supporters and even their.American born children. Only a doomed society let's in people that hate it's country

[QUOTE=Media Moderator;14898036]If you ever have to second guess which side you are on is the correct one just watch this

[video=youtube;q9y6sj98ZFM]https://youtu.be/q9y6sj98ZFM?si=Nyb40QVwEBth_bWB[/video]

ProPalestinians chanting "Death to Israel. Death to America" in the effin US by some people that we had the misguided decision to let into this country. Absolutely crazy.

These people are lucky I'm not president, I'd deport all foreign born Pro-Palestine supporters and even their.American born children. Only a doomed society let's in people that hate it's country[/QUOTE]
Shut up fatty

[QUOTE=RRR3;14898038]Shut up fatty[/QUOte]


Hey Froseph, you can make that claim a million times, it's never going to be true

Someone is triggered that their friends are screaming "Death to America"