Re: Wade's Historical Rank Among SGs
[QUOTE=PJR]If it weren't for that damn freak shoulder injury, Wade's case would be so much stronger. This Clyde Drexler shit would be even more laughable than it is now.
He was cookin' in 2006-07. Had like 28-7-5 on 49% shooting thru like the first 40 games, and then he ran into Shane Battier. Dislocation, torn labrum :banghead: That robbed him of a year and half of his prime, because he delayed the surgery.
He would be looking at sustained greatness of 9 or 10 straight years now, instead of like 8.5 years. But I digress.[/QUOTE]
The League changed the rules for players like Wade.
Re: Wade's Historical Rank Among SGs
[QUOTE=NLZ]Jordan
Bryant
West
Allen Iverson/Dwyane Wade[/QUOTE]
My friend, Iverson is not even a debate. Wade>AI on offense and rebounding, >>>>> when it comes to defense.
Re: Wade's Historical Rank Among SGs
[QUOTE=Young X]Nothing objective points to Wade never being a candidate for best player in the league. He led his team to a championship, won FMVP, put up all-time great numbers, top 3 in MVP voting, top 3 in DPOY voting, led the league in scoring, great playoff peformances, etc...[/QUOTE]
Exactly. People need to start thinking for themselves and making their own judgements when watching the game. Not winning an mvp doesn't mean that you were never the best player in the league. It is possible to win the mvp even though another player is out there playing just as well as you are.
Re: Wade's Historical Rank Among SGs
[QUOTE=97 bulls]The League changed the rules for players like Wade.[/QUOTE]
Spare me this nonsense.
Dwyane Wade would cook an any era. And I mean any era. He's a transcendent talent.
There was handchecking in Wade's rookie year, and he was still one of the more electrifying rookies in the business, and clearly bound for superstardom.
There's A reason Shaq was cool with being traded to Miami. He saw it too.
Re: Wade's Historical Rank Among SGs
[QUOTE=97 bulls]The League changed the rules for players like Wade.[/QUOTE]
Most legit point you have made in this thread, but Wade still is an all-time great.
Re: Wade's Historical Rank Among SGs
[QUOTE=97 bulls]I wouldnt put much stock in Jordan's opinion on talent. His evaluation of talent hasnt done anything for the Bobcats.[/QUOTE]
But it wasn't just Jordan's opinion. Many people thought that, including [I]us[/I] fans.
Re: Wade's Historical Rank Among SGs
[QUOTE=Young X]Nothing objective points to Wade never being a candidate for best player in the league. He led his team to a championship, won FMVP, put up all-time great numbers, top 3 in MVP voting, top 3 in DPOY voting, led the league in scoring, great playoff peformances, etc...[/QUOTE]
Hes never been. After Jordan. Shaq took the reigns, then Kobe , now James.
Re: Wade's Historical Rank Among SGs
Being real now (and it's not like I heard the argument) Drexler is simply not as good as Dwyane Wade. It's ridiculous to think so.
Wade might have been the MVP in 07 if he doesn't get hurt. He was ridiculous.
He was a beast the next year. And the year after, he should have won the MVP.
When you factor in the playoffs, Wade was the Heat's best player in 05. The next year, he was insane. He's a guy who does everything without over-dominating the ball to do so. Dwyane Wade is better than Drexler.
Maybe he could have been better than West, but I really don't see how he could be considered better than West right now. But there is no one outside that top 3 that really has any argument over him.
Lastly, Lebron really only established himself as the league's best player during last year. Not saying Wade was or was not the best player in the league, but he's in that discussion. Couldn't we argue that West was never the best player in the league? It was Wilt then Kareem...isn't that an argument to have? Whatever, Wade is #4 with a comparable prime to #3...but unless Wade goes back to being truly elite, he won't climb West. And even then, he might not.
Re: Wade's Historical Rank Among SGs
[QUOTE=red1]My friend, Iverson is not even a debate. Wade>AI on offense and rebounding, >>>>> when it comes to defense.[/QUOTE]
Iverson vs Wade
[B]1x Most Valuable Player[/B] vs 0x Most Valuable Player
0x Finals MVP vs [B]1x Finals MVP[/B]
[B]1x Rookie of the Year[/B] vs 0x Rookie of the Year
[B]11
Re: Wade's Historical Rank Among SGs
[QUOTE=97 bulls]Hes never been. After Jordan. Shaq took the reigns, then Kobe , now James.[/QUOTE]
Going by this logic, Duncan and KG never were candidates for best player in the league, which is obviously wrong.
Re: Wade's Historical Rank Among SGs
[QUOTE=NLZ]Iverson vs Wade
[B]1x Most Valuable Player[/B] vs 0x Most Valuable Player
0x Finals MVP vs [B]1x Finals MVP[/B]
[B]1x Rookie of the Year[/B] vs 0x Rookie of the Year
[B]11
Re: Wade's Historical Rank Among SGs
Iverson is another guy who is underrated, and he is definitely a unique and special player for different reasons, mainly his size and heart, but ultimately he is not as valuable to a team as wade is or was. I am not going to mention rings or stats or anythings just gonna say that wade is prototypical as a shooting guard, he can guard any guard in the league whereas AI is a little guy who will get torched by bigger players who can back him down. Just harder to build around the guy.
Re: Wade's Historical Rank Among SGs
Anyone have accurate stats for Wade in the 2006 - 2007 season, before his injury?
Re: Wade's Historical Rank Among SGs
[QUOTE=Money 23]Anyone have accurate stats for Wade in the 2006 - 2007 season, before his injury?[/QUOTE]
28.8 pts, 7.9 asts, 4.8 rebs, 2.2 stls, 1.3 blks on 49% (46 games).
Re: Wade's Historical Rank Among SGs
[QUOTE=Young X]28.8 pts, 7.9 asts, 4.8 rebs, 2.2 stls, 1.3 blks on 49% (46 games).[/QUOTE]
Ridiculous. :mad: