i think rose is stronger since he can bench 375 and squat 600
Printable View
i think rose is stronger since he can bench 375 and squat 600
[QUOTE=inclinerator]i think rose is stronger since he can bench 375 and squat 600[/QUOTE]
What? Where the hell did you get those numbers from?
Rose will be a bigger Tony Parker...shooting threes as a pg is SO overrated
[QUOTE=CelticForce1349]What? Where the hell did you get those numbers from?[/QUOTE]
I'd be interested as well. If true, that's pretty impressive.
[QUOTE=Da KO King]Derrick Rose will be a stronger less likely to chuck TJ Ford. Drawing a blank on a better player to accurately describe that but.... :confusedshrug:[/QUOTE]
Uh no ... just ... no. Your self proclaimed knowledge of the game is just, WOW, LOL ...
Just looking at him I buy 350/600. Its not an absurd weight for a guy his size and build. Plenty of high school kids can do that. Id be shocked if he maxed out anything under 280 or so.
[QUOTE=Samurai Swoosh]Uh no ... just ... no. Your self proclaimed knowledge of the game is just, WOW, LOL ...[/QUOTE]
Like I said I'm drawing a blank on a better comparison right now. He doesn't quite have the shooting touch for me to go with "Young Marbury" or "Young Baron". Doesn't have the handle or lack of common sense for me to say "Young Francis". Doesn't have the vision or speedy decision making for me to say Kidd either.
Frankly, TJ Ford is the best I can do right now. I'm sure someone else will come to mind soon enough.
TJ Ford without the courtvision isnt that bad. TJ in Francis body. He kinda bounces off people and pinballs around like Marbury did though.
What I kinda hopes happens with Rose is that some one arraigns for him to spend a week or two in the summer with Jeff Van Gundy. Van Gundy is probably the best pick-n-roll coach in the business right now (only guy even in the conversation with him is Jerry Sloan). If Rose was to work with Van Gundy and get to a level where he can accurately make all the proper reads he'd be a top 5 PG as early as next season.
Tonight he played 40+ mins.
[B]4-13 shooting.[/B]
[B]11 pts.[/B]
[B]3 ast.[/B]
:violin:
[QUOTE=J000]Tonight he played 40+ mins.
[B]4-13 shooting.[/B]
[B]11 pts.[/B]
[B]3 ast.[/B]
:violin:[/QUOTE]
Did you watch the game?
[QUOTE=ChiBulls7]Did you watch the game?[/QUOTE]
I don't need to watch the game, i just looked at the minutes played and his shooting percentage. His ast for a PG is quite low, 2 assist in 40 min.
My initial reaction iz :violin:
[QUOTE=J000]I don't need to watch the game, i just looked at the minutes played and his shooting percentage. His ast for a PG is quite low, 2 assist in 40 min.
My initial reaction iz :violin:[/QUOTE]
Your right you don't need to watch the game in order to accurately judge a player.
[QUOTE=J000]Tonight he played 40+ mins.
[B]4-13 shooting.[/B]
[B]11 pts.[/B]
[B]3 ast.[/B]
:violin:[/QUOTE]
And managed to bowen Deron's ankle.
:banghead:
[QUOTE=ChiBulls7]Your right you don't need to watch the game in order to accurately judge a player.[/QUOTE]
Actually you don't.
I havn't watched Bynum last season but judging by his numbers and his minutes played + efficiency. I know he's a good player when given the oppurtunity.
But c'mon..
40+ min and 2 ast for a PG is just disappointing.