[B]Chris Webber Should be In the Top 50.
There are Too Many 1 or 2 Dimensional Players Over Chris Webber: Who Could Do Everything at a Good and Decent Level.[/B]
Printable View
[B]Chris Webber Should be In the Top 50.
There are Too Many 1 or 2 Dimensional Players Over Chris Webber: Who Could Do Everything at a Good and Decent Level.[/B]
[QUOTE=WockaVodka]lol at this. RRR3 is some 17 year old kid and he is fat, ugly, bad acne, and is some jew.
All the people people have listed to defend rrr3 are like 30-40, they were in shape at one point in their life probably.
Plus, Clayton isn't an analyst, he is a reporter.[/QUOTE]
Looks are still irrelevant. His age and lack of knowledge are one thing.
Even when Jeff Van Gundy was "in shape" and playing basketball, he looked like a dweeb that didn't belong anywhere near a basketball court.
[QUOTE=MiamiThrice]Yeah your right.
Pau was never on Kobes level in the 2010 Finals. He was above it. Good point bro :applause:
I'll give you one last chance to prove why Kobe was more instrumental to winning in the 2010 Finals, but I personally don't believe you have the ability to do anything beyond reading box scores. Offer me some analysis on those games that proved Kobe was more vital than Gasol.
In b4 "blah blah points blah blah assists" :oldlol: You can always tell the kids that were never around the game.[/QUOTE]
What player were the Celtics defense focused on trying to stop? Using double and triple teams on? I know who it was, do you? What does that say about one guy where defenses focus on and throw bodies at if he gets anywhere close to the paint, and the other gets single coverage?
[QUOTE=Round Mound][B]Chris Webber Should be In the Top 50.
There are Too Many 1 or 2 Dimensional Players Over Chris Webber: who Could Do Everything at a Good and Decent Level.[/B][/QUOTE]
Furthermore, there is no way Reggie Miller was the player Chris Webber was. Not very close actually.
And Ray Allen wasn't either.
[QUOTE=MiamiThrice]Yeah your right.
Pau was never on Kobes level in the 2010 Finals. He was above it. Good point bro :applause:
.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, that's why he won Finals MVP.... lol
[QUOTE=Deuce Bigalow]What player were the Celtics defense focused on trying to stop? Using double and triple teams on? I know who it was, do you? What does that say about one guy where defenses focus on and throw bodies at if he gets anywhere close to the paint, and the other gets single coverage?[/QUOTE]
The player that can easily be taken out of the series thats who. Kobe is one of the easiest superstars ever to shut down with a great defense. Just like in 2004 when Shaq who was the clear best player on LA recieved single coverage and Kobe got the harder looks. Detroit realized Shaq was going to get his no matter what and they wanted to focus on the lesser teammates they could shut down.
Gasol is a great passer, sending double and triple teams at him out of the post would be a death sentence. Smart gameplanning making Kobe struggle when its obvious he cares about scoring above all else even with the double/triple teams.
And guess what? Despite being a perimeter player and having the ball 10x more than Gasol and apparantly seeing all of these "double and triple teams" Kobe only averaged 3.9 APG to Gasols 3.7 APG. :oldlol:
This is too easy.
[IMG]http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/showpost.php?p=3092557&postcount=8[/IMG]
RG :roll: Being a psychotic **** since 2009 :bowdown:
[QUOTE=MiamiThrice]The player that can easily be taken out of the series thats who. Kobe is one of the easiest superstars ever to shut down with a great defense. Just like in 2004 when Shaq who was the clear best player on LA recieved single coverage and Kobe got the harder looks. Detroit realized Shaq was going to get his no matter what and they wanted to focus on the lesser teammates they could shut down.
Gasol is a great passer, sending double and triple teams at him out of the post would be a death sentence. Smart gameplanning making Kobe struggle when its obvious he cares about scoring above all else even with the double/triple teams.
And guess what? Despite being a perimeter player and having the ball 10x more than Gasol and apparantly seeing all of these "double and triple teams" Kobe only averaged 3.9 APG to Gasols 3.7 APG. :oldlol:
This is too easy.[/QUOTE]
So you admit that Kobe received the defensive attention, and Pau didn't.
That was easy
[QUOTE=WockaVodka]JVG never looked like some fat crater faced jew who never plays any type of sport and jerks off to brazzers all day after coming back home from school so your post is irrelevant.[/QUOTE]
He may not have been fat and crater faced, but he definitely can pass for being a Jew who came home from school to whack it to some hooters and honkers in an old pinup magazine.
My post remains relevant.
[QUOTE=Deuce Bigalow]So you admit that Kobe received the defensive attention, and Pau didn't.
That was easy[/QUOTE]
Kobe recieved the attention because it's easy to make him struggle when you have a great defense in the Finals.
LA won the games because of inside domination. Kobe had virtually nothing to do with that when compared to Gasol.
Have you ever played basketball in your life?
[QUOTE=WockaVodka]JVG never looked like some fat crater faced jew who never plays any type of sport and jerks off to brazzers all day after coming back home from school so your post is irrelevant.[/QUOTE]
Doesn't Brazzers cost money?
Deuce, sorry RG is too immature not to ruin your thread.
[QUOTE=MiamiThrice]Kobe recieved the attention because it's easy to make him struggle when you have a great defense in the Finals.
LA won the games because of inside domination. Kobe had virtually nothing to do with that when compared to Gasol.
Have you ever played basketball in your life?[/QUOTE]Kobe averaged 8.0 rpg, Gasol 11.6
In the WCF, they both averaged 7.2 rpg
3.6 rebounds does not makes up for the 10 points in difference
and lol at Kobe averaging the same amount of rebounds as "dominant inside" Gasol in the WCF
RG is a complete lunatic.
"Fat crater" :oldlol: :wtf: