Re: It's time to admit the 16' Warriors weren't that good & simply had strategy becau
[QUOTE=3ba11;14479212]No, I've actually improved.... as in I provided criteria for my top 10, which you won't see anyone do
For example, we saw Melo make the top 75 because of scoring prowess despite never winning jack shit, while Pippen made it because of ring count and not scoring (the opposite of what Melo made it for)...
Then Lillard is chosen for no reason over Kyrie, who actually won and had historic performance against the only unanimous league MVP in history - whereas I believe Curry destroyed Lillard but I have to go check..
So there was zero criteria for anyone's list, while I provided clear-cut criteria for mine, aka only players that know how to win should be included (organic) - that's a pretty good criteria right?... Knowing how to win matters right?... And then of course guys that can carry teams without super-teams or 1b's (10 ppg more than teammates in PO & Finals).[/QUOTE]
More lies as usual.
