Printable View
[QUOTE=Deuce Bigalow]Your body starts going down hill at 40, not in your 30s.[/QUOTE]
:facepalm
Tell that to all the NBA player's that never made it to 40. I wonder what KG or Tim Duncan has to say about that.
[IMG]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ag4U35aNZII/TEPNEKkLAaI/AAAAAAAAFNE/A3Tr1XeICkc/s1600/dumbass.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=bwink23]LOL....:facepalm ....WOW....do me a favor and GROW UP...."Testosterone loss in men is a gradual process. Testosterone decline starts around age 30, and may drop 1% to 3 % per year depending on genetics and lifestyle. That means that men can sustain a 20% drop in testosterone by age 50, and a 50% drop by age 80. Each man may experience the symptoms of a decline in testosterone differently depending on what his normal was at his hormonal peak. Often the symptoms are ignored or rationalized away until the resultant decreased functioning becomes a way of life."[/QUOTE]
testosterone is highest in your late teenage years
are you strongest then??????
come on dude thats not how it works nor is that how the body develops ... these initial early testosterone decreases don't have that much of an impact on strength until later ...
[QUOTE=CavaliersFTW]:facepalm
Tell that to all the NBA player's that never made it to 40. I wonder what KG or Tim Duncan has to say about that.
[IMG]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ag4U35aNZII/TEPNEKkLAaI/AAAAAAAAFNE/A3Tr1XeICkc/s1600/dumbass.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
Strength wise. Not athletically.
[QUOTE=Deuce Bigalow]again bwink that is how most men develop like[/QUOTE]
AGAIN....for the slow person...strength and size are NOT the same. :facepalm
Of course people have a tendency to get bigger as they age...that's common sense...to say they "get stronger" is flat-out retarded.....:facepalm
[QUOTE=Deuce Bigalow]Strength wise. Not athletically.[/QUOTE]
Strength can be one of the last things to leave a man but as long as you don't confuse that with [I]power[/I] (plus the health of your joints/etc), which all fades rather quickly. Power is strength times acceleration, which might be what bwink is referring too. You won't be doing things like leaping to your max vert or showing off youthful explosiveness into your early 30's, sometimes even your late 20's - to the same degree that you could when you were 21-25.
[QUOTE=HighFlyer23]testosterone is highest in your late teenage years
[B]are you strongest then??????
[/B]
come on dude thats not how it works nor is that how the body develops ... these initial early testosterone decreases don't have that much of an impact on strength until later ...[/QUOTE]
I started lifting weights when i was 15...my max bench by the time i was 18 was 245 pounds weighing 165....
I reached my near-high school mass index just 2 years ago...and was lifting naturally for 6 straight months...my max was 220...so you tell me.....:confusedshrug:
[QUOTE=bwink23]AGAIN....for the slow person...strength and size are NOT the same. :facepalm
Of course people have a tendency to get bigger as they age...that's common sense...to say they "get stronger" is flat-out retarded.....:facepalm[/QUOTE]
Are you alive? Do you not see people around you?
:facepalm
look at the average 20s year old guys and compare them to the 30 year olds
Common sense
[QUOTE=Deuce Bigalow]Are you alive? Do you not see people around you?
:facepalm
look at the average 20s year old guys and compare them to the 30 year olds
Common sense[/QUOTE]
AGAIN...your very slow....SIZE does not equal strength.
[QUOTE=bwink23]AGAIN...your very slow....SIZE does not equal strength.[/QUOTE]
most of the time it does
most 200 pound men are stronger than 160-180 pound men.
no a 120 lb dude who works out is more likely to be stronger than a more massive 250 lb guy who works out
no correlation between size and strength there ... more mas doesn't mean more strength ... skinny 200 lb jordan was FAR stronger than 220 lb Jordan who was beasting people in the post :hammerhead:
[QUOTE=HighFlyer23]no a 120 lb dude who works out is more likely to be stronger than a more massive 250 lb guy who works out
no correlation between size and strength there ... more mas doesn't mean more strength ... skinny 200 lb jordan was FAR stronger than 220 lb Jordan who was beasting people in the post :hammerhead:[/QUOTE]
Did you ever see a 24-year old Jordan who weighed 215-220?? WHY?? cuz he wasn't lifting...
23,24 year-old Jordan at 215 would be stronger and more explosive than a 32-year old Jordan at the same weight with the same routine....TRUE STATEMENT
Didn't Greg Oden when he was 20 years old put on 30 pounds of upper body mass within a few months ??
[url]http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=3115030[/url]
[QUOTE=bwink23]Didn't Greg Oden when he was 20 years old put on 30 pounds of upper body mass within a few months ??
[url]http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=3115030[/url][/QUOTE]
:roll: @ 30lbs of muscle in one year, dudes on gear put on maybe 15lbs of muscle in two years.
That's like that early season report stating LeBron and Wade were between 3-6% body fat, laughable stuff.
[QUOTE=bwink23]Didn't Greg Oden when he was 20 years old put on 30 pounds of upper body mass within a few months ??
[url]http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=3115030[/url][/QUOTE]
And only a small percentage of that was muscle.
[QUOTE=FireDavidKahn]And only a small percentage of that was muscle.[/QUOTE]
that's not what was reported...........:no:
stick to the facts son.
[QUOTE=abuC]:roll: @ 30lbs of muscle in one year, dudes on gear put on maybe 15lbs of muscle in two years.
That's like that early season report stating LeBron and Wade were between 3-6% body fat, laughable stuff.[/QUOTE]
If you believe that a 24-year old, 215 pound Jordan who's being weight training since 16-18 years old wouldn't be stronger and far more explosive than a 32-year old 215-pound Jordan who's been weight training since the same age.....
I got some swamp land i'd like to sell you......:roll:
[QUOTE=bwink23]that's not what was reported...........:no:
stick to the facts son.[/QUOTE]
Upper body mass does not equal lean muscle. Read some real facts, son.
[URL="http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/maki2.htm"]http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/maki2.htm[/URL]
[quote]The Colgan Institute of Nutritional Sciences (located in San Diego, CA) run by Dr Michael Colgan PHD, a leading sport nutritionist explains that in his extensive experience, the most muscle gain he or any of his colleagues have recorded over a year was 18 1/4 lbs. Dr Colgan goes on to state that "because of the limiting rate of turnover in the muscle cells it is impossible to grow more than an ounce of new muscle each day."[/quote]
[QUOTE=FireDavidKahn]Upper body mass does not equal lean muscle. Read some real facts, son.
[URL="http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/maki2.htm"]http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/maki2.htm[/URL][/QUOTE]
DUH....everyone knows that...thanks for making my point to the other idiots here for me that size does not equal strength.....:hammerhead:
He still put on 30 pounds of upper-body weight through lifting no matter how you want to slice it...:facepalm
[url]http://www.thepostgame.com/blog/men-action/201202/wilt-chamberlain-human-and-superhuman[/url]
[QUOTE=Deuce Bigalow][IMG]http://images.collectors.com/smrweb/smr1206/5980054_Wilt_Chamberlain_76.jpg[/IMG]
- 500 lbs bench press
- 50" vertical
- Curl 100 lb DBs as easily as we can pick up our phones
- Beat up a mountain lion and threw it by its tail
- Slept with 20,000 women, jlauber's mom being one of them
- Dunked his freethrows in high school
- Dunked the ball so hard that it crushed the opponents toes
- Could average 70 points per game in the 90's
- At age 59 he could bench 465 lbs like it was a match stick
- Clean and jerk 435 lbs
- A world class volleyball player, in Volleyball Hall of Fame[/QUOTE]
That`s a hell yes from me!! :cheers:
You'd think he'd win more than 2 rings tho
[QUOTE=HighFlyer23]You'd think he'd win more than 2 rings tho[/QUOTE]
ILt couldn't fake his ring count even if he tried. :oldlol:
You can find similar tall tales about many celebrities prior to I'd say the 70's.
It's mostly BS at the end of the day.
[QUOTE]- Dunked the ball so hard that it crushed the opponents toes[/QUOTE]
:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
What would've happened to the league/basketball if he didn't wear condoms? Wouldn't we have 7 footers with a 40 inch vertical on every block? or is he just lying that he slept with that much women? :confusedshrug:
[img]https://i.imgflip.com/w4s9h.gif[/img]
Let's talk about the final wilt "tall tale" that's not really a tale and has been confirmed by almost anyone that played with him. His manlihood, i.e. His **** size. He was said to be carrying around a monster in his pants, and there is this story that in the 70s a lot of reporters went into the locker room to interview wilt, and wilt had "forgot" to wear his underwear or towel. So he was answering questions in the nude, and of all people Marv Albert was there to hide wilts ***** from the cameras...how he did this I'm unsure of but he says in his sports career it was one of his most embarrassing moments. Anyone who can share stories of this please do!!
Now let's think of the the 2 players he's typically compared to...MJ and Shaq. Both players have reputedly small c0cks given their size. And bad in bed too rofl. Wilt? He was an alpha in the sack, that's the troof.
[QUOTE=DaRkJaWs]Let's talk about the final wilt "tall tale" that's not really a tale and has been confirmed by almost anyone that played with him. His manlihood, i.e. His **** size. He was said to be carrying around a monster in his pants, and there is this story that in the 70s a lot of reporters went into the locker room to interview wilt, and wilt had "forgot" to wear his underwear or towel. So he was answering questions in the nude, and of all people Marv Albert was there to hide wilts ***** from the cameras...how he did this I'm unsure of but he says in his sports career it was one of his most embarrassing moments. Anyone who can share stories of this please do!!
Now let's think of the the 2 players he's typically compared to...MJ and Shaq. Both players have reputedly small c0cks given their size. And bad in bed too rofl. Wilt? He was an alpha in the sack, that's the troof.[/QUOTE]
:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
[QUOTE=DaRkJaWs]Let's talk about the final wilt "tall tale" that's not really a tale and has been confirmed by almost anyone that played with him. His manlihood, i.e. His **** size. He was said to be carrying around a monster in his pants, and there is this story that in the 70s a lot of reporters went into the locker room to interview wilt, and wilt had "forgot" to wear his underwear or towel. So he was answering questions in the nude, and of all people Marv Albert was there to hide wilts ***** from the cameras...how he did this I'm unsure of but he says in his sports career it was one of his most embarrassing moments. Anyone who can share stories of this please do!!
Now let's think of the the 2 players he's typically compared to...MJ and Shaq. Both players have reputedly small c0cks given their size. And bad in bed too rofl. Wilt? He was an alpha in the sack, that's the troof.[/QUOTE]
Yeah unless you can provide a link I'm gonna say that sounds more like fantasy than reality :rolleyes:
Someone posted this: "I heard Wilt Chamberlain had to tape his to the inside of his leg to keep it from flopping around like an elephant's trunk during games."
From [url]http://m.neogaf.com/showthread.php?t=700399[/url]
Lol found it:
"
DaRkJaWs > CavsFTW
Every time I feel down and depressed, I open this thread to cheer me up.
Video footage taken from inside Wilt's house....
[IMG]https://media2.giphy.com/media/Gi3OeSrfwjhHa/200.gif[/IMG]