-
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=oh the horror]What's funny to me is your general Caucasian going on about blacks and violence.
My white fellows do you forget your nature?
Hahaha, umm the Crusades, Slavery, Trail of Tears, The Aztecs, Hitler, Manson, McVeigh....most serial killers infamous are whites....I could go on and on...
You founded this country on blood and murdering while taking from native Americans kiddos.
This is a prime example of "white privilege". The whole "I've never really lived it so it doesn't exist" shit you dudes pull
You don't know wtf you're talking about.[/QUOTE]
Ok, this post is incredibly ignorant and also pretty racist. You have already grouped together all white people as being 'Caucasian' and then listed all the evils perpetrated by these evil white people. Well, where do i fit in in this narrow perception of the world? I am white, but i am also Polish, and live in the UK (with dual citizenship and family in Florida). My ancestors will have had nothing to do with any of those things you listed. My father's Grandfather spent the war in a nazi camp, and my Grandparents grew up in wartime Warsawa, which was completely obliterated by the nazis.
After the war, Poland was sacrificed to years of backwardness by the US and UK to appease Stalin. The country has still not recovered, and the remnants of those years still remain. So my family moves to the UK, they work hard, do pretty well, and integrate effectively. Yet whenever i pass the news stands there is constant racist material disparaging immigrants from Eastern Europe, which is all ok to the rest of the media, because, we are white. Yet do i hold these things against all Britons and Americans in general? Do i blame them for it? Do i keep complaining about 'American' privilege (you're included in this one btw) or 'British' privilege? Of course i bloody don't, and neither should you.
Now, i feel no more allegiance to the descendants of slaves, or those of slave holders, because i know that these people have nothing to do with their ancestors, and it is absolutely absurd to bring up something from several hundred years ago (or even a single generation for that matter) as if it has ANY bearing on the characters of the people of today.
So where do i fit in this white/black, oppressors/oppressed dichotomy you seem so hellbent on pursuing and believing in?
[QUOTE=oh the horror]Lets get this straight. There are many really cool whites. But don't talk to me like I'm imagining profiling and racism. It EXISTS.[/QUOTE]
Yeah well done genius. Human beings are narrow-minded, tribal creatures in general. Which is why you will never eradicate racism and people's desperate need to feel superior. You clearly don't have any viable solutions, so why keep stating the bloody obvious (racism exists!! really!?!?!).
Just stop whinging as if the state can somehow force racist people to change their thinking. NEVER GONNA HAPPEN. Stop being so desperate and pathetic and be a goddam man for Christ's sake. This kind of self-pity is insufferable, and only breeds more racism (like the crap you wrote above).
-
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=dude77]tell us how you really feel son .. let out your rage against the white man(totally acceptable and encouraged .. never talk bad about blacks though or you're an evil satanic racist !
[URL=http://s1214.photobucket.com/user/steelermia/media/yesjacknicholson_zps05431380.gif.html][IMG]http://i1214.photobucket.com/albums/cc494/steelermia/yesjacknicholson_zps05431380.gif[/IMG][/URL][/QUOTE]
This is why you are a clown. He just took a steaming dump on your head and all you can respond with is a deflection somehow managing to bring up your prejudice
-
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=Dresta]Ok, this post is incredibly ignorant and also pretty racist. You have already grouped together all white people as being 'Caucasian' and then listed all the evils perpetrated by these evil white people. Well, where do i fit in in this narrow perception of the world? I am white, but i am also Polish, and live in the UK (with dual citizenship and family in Florida). My ancestors will have had nothing to do with any of those things you listed. My father's Grandfather spent the war in a nazi camp, and my Grandparents grew up in wartime Warsawa, which was completely obliterated by the nazis.
After the war, Poland was sacrificed to years of backwardness by the US and UK to appease Stalin. The country has still not recovered, and the remnants of those years still remain. So my family moves to the UK, they work hard, do pretty well, and integrate effectively. Yet whenever i pass the news stands there is constant racist material disparaging immigrants from Eastern Europe, which is all ok to the rest of the media, because, we are white. Yet do i hold these things against all Britons and Americans in general? Do i blame them for it? Do i keep complaining about 'American' privilege (you're included in this one btw) or 'British' privilege? Of course i bloody don't, and neither should you.
Now, i feel no more allegiance to the descendants of slaves, or those of slave holders, because i know that these people have nothing to do with their ancestors, and it is absolutely absurd to bring up something from several hundred years ago (or even a single generation for that matter) as if it has ANY bearing on the characters of the people of today.
So where do i fit in this white/black, oppressors/oppressed dichotomy you seem so hellbent on pursuing and believing in?
Yeah well done genius. Human beings are narrow-minded, tribal creatures in general. Which is why you will never eradicate racism and people's desperate need to feel superior. You clearly don't have any viable solutions, so why keep stating the bloody obvious (racism exists!! really!?!?!).
Just stop whinging as if the state can somehow force racist people to change their thinking. NEVER GONNA HAPPEN. Stop being so desperate and pathetic and be a goddam man for Christ's sake. This kind of self-pity is insufferable, and only breeds more racism (like the crap you wrote above).[/QUOTE]
Slavery still affects people of today. Not physically (well other than breeding), but mentally.
-
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=red1]This is why you are a clown. He just took a steaming dump on your head and all you can respond with is a deflection somehow managing to bring up your prejudice[/QUOTE]
gtfoh you piece of shit .. he just took an anti white, RACIST stance and you're trying to call 'me' prejudice ? .. go fk yourself ..
I'm mocking him for being a pathetic perpetual victim .. which is why blacks have so many problems in their communities .. because of the weak, victim mentality they have(as evidenced by horror) .. 'woe is me i'm black .. we have it harder than ANYONE else .. let me cry some more .. ok now feel sorry for me ' .. rinse and repeat .. PATHETIC ..
everyone has problems .. not just blacks .. horror tries to paint some world where blacks live in oppression and everyone else lives in a fkn disneyworld .. you fkn idiot
-
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=Rasheed1]:cheers: Props to Reppy.. I was thinking about the wwyd skit also..
[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0kV_b3IK9M[/url]
they even throw a girl in for good measure[/QUOTE]
I don't know if it's this video or the car one, but it was amazing to me how much more in your face people were with the black kids. They had no issue getting in their business and giving them a talking down to.
-
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=red1]This is why you are a clown. He just took a steaming dump on your head and all you can respond with is a deflection somehow managing to bring up your prejudice[/QUOTE]
A steaming dump? :rolleyes: Oh the horror just exposed himself as a racist
-
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=dude77]gtfoh you piece of shit .. he just took an anti white, RACIST stance and you're trying to call 'me' prejudice ? .. go fk yourself ..
I'm mocking him for being a pathetic perpetual victim .. which is why blacks have so many problems in their communities .. because of the weak, victim mentality they have(as evidenced by horror) .. 'woe is me i'm black .. we have it harder than ANYONE else .. let me cry some more .. ok now feel sorry for me ' .. rinse and repeat .. PATHETIC ..
everyone has problems .. not just blacks .. horror tries to paint some world where blacks live in oppression and everyone else lives in a fkn disneyworld .. you fkn idiot[/QUOTE]
Living in poverty (which a lot of black people are) can have that kind of effect on people. It's not rocket science man. I'm black and I make no excuses for myself. You probably don't even associate with black people at all, so how the hell would you know what they think?
-
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=Jameerthefear] I'm black and I make no excuses for myself [/QUOTE]
you are in the minority
-
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=dude77]you are in the minority[/QUOTE]
No, I'm not actually. Do you have any empathy?
-
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
You guys have to admit... black Americans complaining about racism in the 21st century and acting like it's their major problem is pretty funny.
It might've been white vs. black in the 1800s and part of the 1900s... but now it's rich vs. poor. American obstacles aren't race today, they're entirely socioeconomic.
-
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=oh the horror]What's funny to me is your general Caucasian going on about blacks and violence.
My white fellows do you forget your nature?
Hahaha, umm the Crusades, Slavery, Trail of Tears, The Aztecs, Hitler, Manson, McVeigh....most serial killers infamous are whites....I could go on and on...
You founded this country on blood and murdering while taking from native Americans kiddos.
This is a prime example of "white privilege". The whole "I've never really lived it so it doesn't exist" shit you dudes pull
Don't talk to me like racism and profiling is a conspiracy theory. How DARE you sit there ignorantly blowing out of your mealy mouths. I'm a person with BROWN skin that lived it for years. My family moved me to "better" neighborhoods for a good life and was constantly reminded about MY skin color by the law or even local white people.
You don't know wtf you're talking about.[/QUOTE]
How do people let a post like this go unscathed? Holy shit :oldlol:
What I got from this case, is people, of ALL color, exposing themselves as complete morons.
-
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
"Seriously, why all this talk about racism? No one is racist to [I]me[/I]."
-
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=dude77]gtfoh you piece of shit .. he just took an anti white, RACIST stance and you're trying to call 'me' prejudice ? .. go fk yourself ..
I'm mocking him for being a pathetic perpetual victim .. which is why blacks have so many problems in their communities .. because of the weak, victim mentality they have(as evidenced by horror) .. 'woe is me i'm black .. we have it harder than ANYONE else .. let me cry some more .. ok now feel sorry for me ' .. rinse and repeat .. PATHETIC ..
everyone has problems .. not just blacks .. horror tries to paint some world where blacks live in oppression and everyone else lives in a fkn disneyworld .. you fkn idiot[/QUOTE]
I have seen your posts, you always have every possible excuse on deck for zim and are always ready to condemn trayvon at any moment. This is coming from someone who believed the acquittal was the right way to proceed given the evidence, or the lack of evidence to be more accurate. The issue I have with your posts is the obvious anti-trayvon bias that you have, one would almost think that zimmerman was the victim and not the other way around.
Ohthehorror's post was not racist, he did not claim that whites possess any inherent negative qualities. It was more along the lines of "ye who are without sin, cast the first stone," and all he did was state facts. Victim mentality is some cowardly bullshit but the evil on the other side of that coin would be to disregard the negative bullshit that comes with real racism. In this case did racial profiling play a role in the murder? Probably not but we can all blame the media for leading us to believe that. Hell even I was outraged when I first saw the story
-
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=kuniva_dAMiGhTy]How do people let a post like this go unscathed? Holy shit :oldlol:
What I got from this case, is people, of ALL color, exposing themselves as complete morons.[/QUOTE]
He did what dude77 has been doing for this whole thread...
-
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=dude77]gtfoh you piece of shit .. he just took an anti white, RACIST stance and you're trying to call 'me' prejudice ? .. go fk yourself ..
I'm mocking him for being a pathetic perpetual victim .. which is why blacks have so many problems in their communities .. because of the weak, victim mentality they have(as evidenced by horror) .. 'woe is me i'm black .. we have it harder than ANYONE else .. let me cry some more .. ok now feel sorry for me ' .. rinse and repeat .. PATHETIC ..
everyone has problems .. not just blacks .. horror tries to paint some world where blacks live in oppression and everyone else lives in a fkn disneyworld .. you fkn idiot[/QUOTE]
Just curious, what did he say that was anti-white? He just mentioned the truth -- the elephant in the room, you know -- about how many deaths whites have been responsible for.
Did he say that all whites are murderers? Or serial killers? Or that all whites commit genocide?
Edit: I just noticed he said "your nature". I misread that as "your history". Oh well. I'm keeping this comment up just because I have no problem admitting when I ****ed up.
-
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=dude77]gtfoh you piece of shit .. he just took an anti white, RACIST stance and you're trying to call 'me' prejudice ? .. go fk yourself ..
I'm mocking him for being a pathetic perpetual victim .. [B]which is why blacks have so many problems in their communities .. because of the weak, victim mentality they have(as evidenced by horror) .. 'woe is me i'm black .. we have it harder than ANYONE else .. let me cry some more .. ok now feel sorry for me ' .. rinse and repeat .. PATHETIC .. [/B]
everyone has problems .. not just blacks .. horror tries to paint some world where blacks live in oppression and everyone else lives in a fkn disneyworld .. you fkn idiot[/QUOTE]
Looks like kuniva just skimmed over dude77's post. Condemning a whole group of people when he has had little to no interaction with black people.
-
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=reppy]Just curious, what did he say that was anti-white? He just mentioned the truth -- the elephant in the room, you know -- about how many deaths whites have been responsible for.
Did he say that all whites are murderers? Or serial killers? Or that all whites commit genocide?[/QUOTE]
it definitely has a racist feel to his post .. see drestra's post .. but he did state facts about history and such .. I have no problem with that whatsoever .. but don't call me 'racist' when I state facts about blacks .. hypocrites aren't cool
-
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
What are you..the mediator of this thread? :oldlol: I didn't 'skim' over anything. Just saw oh the horror's post being quoted, that's it.
-
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=kuniva_dAMiGhTy]What are you..the mediator of this thread? :oldlol: I didn't 'skim' over anything. I saw oh the horror's post being quoted, that's it.[/QUOTE]
yes. :D
-
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=red1]one would almost think that zimmerman was the victim and not the other way around[/QUOTE]
Understandably so. If Zimmerman hadn't been armed, he would've unquestionably been the victim. Probably one chilling in a coma or grave.
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/zcOOu17l.jpg[/IMG]
-
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=reppy]Just curious, what did he say that was anti-white? He just mentioned the truth -- the elephant in the room, you know -- about how many deaths whites have been responsible for.
Did he say that all whites are murderers? Or serial killers? Or that all whites commit genocide?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=red1]Ohthehorror's post was not racist, he did not claim that whites possess any inherent negative qualities.[/QUOTE]
Saying that it's "white nature" to kill strikes me as equally racist as saying blacks are naturally violent.
-
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=Raymone]Understandably so. If Zimmerman hadn't been armed, he would've unquestionably been the victim. Probably one chilling in a coma or grave.
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/zcOOu17l.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
zimmerman was no victim
-
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=2013 Lakers]Saying that it's "white nature" to kill strikes me as equally racist as saying blacks are naturally violent.[/QUOTE]
I'm not sure if my edit was visible at the time you saw my post, but I did add that I originally had misread "white nature" as "white history". Which changes my opinion on what he said.
-
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=2013 Lakers]Saying that it's "white nature" to kill strikes me as equally racist as saying blacks are naturally violent.[/QUOTE]
Yea that was not the best way to phrase it. To be fair though aggression is a part of human nature
-
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=Jameerthefear]Slavery still affects people of today. Not physically (well other than breeding), but mentally.[/QUOTE]
So does the handing over of central Europe to the Soviets.
It destroyed many people's lives who are still alive today. Doesn't mean you should expect something extra from people who had nothing to do with it.
Amazing that people make such a fuss about something of which nothing can be done about while you have a mass-murdering injustice wrecker like Henry Kissinger still walking around being treated like some kind of national hero. Think of all the lives that man ruined, and all the clear, indictable evidence against him, and then think how much more use all this media time would've been going after him rather than George Zimmerman :lol:
People need to get real, seriously. There are so many more ****ed up things to be worrying about, things that something could actually be done about if people weren't so obsessed with themselves. (which is exactly what these race-baiters play on: solipsism and self-obsession).
-
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=red1]Yea that was not the best way to phrase it. To be fair though aggression is a part of human nature[/QUOTE]
That's a little unfair on women i think. It's more a part of male nature.
Does that make me a sexist? Amazing you can get called sexist these days for saying that men and women are different.
-
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=JtotheIzzo]Larry Elder is a right wing blowhard, just like everyone else, he is using this to build his own name. Charles Barkley gave an answer to an interview. Different circumstances, and different motives.
The trouble with this case is the system, and I think that is what has peopel so frustrated.
-under the laws of Florida, GZ is innocent, and his lawyers wove the story the right way.
The above gives the Zimmerman backers 100% empowerment in this argument and forces them to have a 'case closed' mentality.
-minorities once again getting f*cked by the system.
This makes blacks (in this situation) and sympathizers even more angry and desperate, a feeling of 'here we go again' or 'will we ever get a fair shake' overcomes them and they feel a need to do something.
The trouble is that the law is shaky, Mr. Zimmerman was portrayed to be unrealistically weak and pathetic, and one could also say that perhaps Trayvon Martin was 'standing his ground.'
GZ was older, armed and in a position of authority (though in a rent-a-cop kind of way).
GZ got out of his SUV.
GZ was told by a dispatcher not to pursue.
But most importantly TM died at the hands of GZ in a confrontation that GZ initiated.
A youth is dead, and no one is paying except the victim, and what's worse the victim is now the villain.
So while the 'law' was upheld (based on the evidence presented) it doesn't pass the sniff test.
Its like the Amare suspension a couple of years ago, the letter of the law was followed when we should have focused more on the spirit of the law.
I think a lesser manslaughter charge would have been the best way forward.[/QUOTE]
Lmao did you just call black people a minority race?
-
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=ReturnofJPR]Well, yeah. Blacks represent 12% of the American population but they are responsible for over 50% of all murders and over 60% of all violent crime.
Do you think people just wake up and create things out of thin air or do you think there is something behind it. [B]Racism is the ultimate conspiracy theory[/B].[/QUOTE]
I used to work with a black guy named Charles. He had been in a gang as a teenager, had the gold teeth, scars from stab wounds, etc. He got out of that life. He was a happy go lucky guy. We played a lot of ball together.
One day someone pulls a gun on him outside of work over a girl. Charles takes the gun away, beats his ass, then throws him out of a second floor window.
The story made the papers. Charles was fired immediately with no explanation. No charges were ever filed against him. Would he have been fired if he was white?
One day i was at a mini-tour golf event as a spectator. I went into the pro shop to buy something. The PGA tour event was on the tv. Tiger Woods had just turned pro and had won his first event the week before.
A little old white lady in front of me asked who was leading the PGA tour event. When the kid behind the counter said "Tiger" the old lady said "i wish he had stayed an amateur". I didn't understand then noticed the kid looking down. Then it hit me why she was against Tiger.
-
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=tontoz]I used to work with a black guy named Charles. He had been in a gang as a teenager, had the gold teeth, scars from stab wounds, etc. He got out of that life. He was a happy go lucky guy. We played a lot of ball together.
One day someone pulls a gun on him outside of work over a girl. Charles takes the gun away, beats his ass, then throws him out of a second floor window.
The story made the papers. Charles was fired immediately with no explanation. No charges were ever filed against him. [B]Would he have been fired if he was white?[/B]
One day i was at a mini-tour golf event as a spectator. I went into the pro shop to buy something. The PGA tour event was on the tv. Tiger Woods had just turned pro and had won his first event the week before.
A little old white lady in front of me asked who was leading the PGA tour event. When the kid behind the counter said "Tiger" the old lady said "i wish he had stayed an amateur". I didn't understand then noticed the kid looking down. Then it hit me why she was against Tiger.[/QUOTE]
Who knows? Would he have been fired if he hadn't had a prior criminal record (i'm assuming he did)? This country does tend to treat those with even minor criminal records like shit. It's like they want to force people to remain criminals.
I think you have to cut old people some slack because their lives are so ****ing miserable. I always just keep this in mind when thinking about old people:
[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DaRMcCa1e-k[/url]
But perhaps she didn't like Chinese people? My step-Grandfather has no problem with African-American people, but he once told me he didn't like Orientals because they 'are very rude.' Old people tend to be more prejudicial, and it is far too late to change them; but don't worry, they'll be dead soon anyway.
And your anecdotal evidence of one little old lady isn't really any evidence for widespread racism. Regardless, as long as you have racial distinctions, you will always have racism, so why continue to emphasise the distinctions?
-
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=tontoz]I used to work with a black guy named Charles. He had been in a gang as a teenager, had the gold teeth, scars from stab wounds, etc. He got out of that life. He was a happy go lucky guy. We played a lot of ball together.
One day someone pulls a gun on him outside of work over a girl. Charles takes the gun away, beats his ass, then throws him out of a second floor window.
The story made the papers. Charles was fired immediately with no explanation. No charges were ever filed against him. Would he have been fired if he was white?
[/QUOTE]
Yes, the firing in this case was appropriate, and would have happened if he was white. I can't see how any corporate environment would welcome a guy, regardless of race, who gets guns pulled on him and tosses people out 2nd story windows around the office.
There was a white guy at my office who got fired for getting arrested for assault. He was fired as soon as the partners heard about the case.
-
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=MavsSuperFan]Yes, the firing in this case was appropriate, and would have happened if he was white. I can't see how any corporate environment would welcome a guy, regardless of race, who gets guns pulled on him and tosses people out 2nd story windows around the office.
There was a white guy at my office who got fired for getting arrested for assault. He was fired as soon as the partners heard about the case.[/QUOTE]
Charles was never arrested or charged with anything. Not comparable.
There are plenty of people who get guns pulled on them who haven't done anything wrong. Not many of them can fight back. Some get killed.
-
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=tontoz]I used to work with a black guy named Charles. He had been in a gang as a teenager, had the gold teeth, scars from stab wounds, etc. He got out of that life. He was a happy go lucky guy. We played a lot of ball together.
One day someone pulls a gun on him outside of work over a girl. Charles takes the gun away, beats his ass, then throws him out of a second floor window.
The story made the papers. Charles was fired immediately with no explanation. No charges were ever filed against him. Would he have been fired if he was white?
[/QUOTE]
are you sure that's all to the story ? .. you said he was a gangbanger and 'got out of that life' uhuh .. usually when you're involved in shady shit, things like this happen to you .. makes me think of this marissa alexander case .. there was more to the story than we were being told
-
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=dude77]are you sure that's all to the story ? .. you said he was a gangbanger and 'got out of that life' uhuh .. usually when you're involved in shady shit, things like this happen to you .. makes me think of this marissa alexander case .. there was more to the story than we were being told[/QUOTE]
He was in gangs as a teenager in NY. He left and was working in Maryland for years before this happened.
I think you are just someone who sees what they want to see. This is someone i knew personally. I know what happened. He was a ladies man and one of the ladies had a jealous boyfriend who didn't know Charles and pulled a gun on the wrong guy.
-
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=tontoz]He was in gangs as a teenager in NY. He left and was working in Maryland for years before this happened.
I think you are just someone who sees what they want to see. This is someone i knew personally. I know what happened. He was a ladies man and one of the ladies had a jealous boyfriend who didn't know Charles and pulled a gun on the wrong guy.[/QUOTE]
got it .. well .. messing with other guys' gfs/wives will cause things like this .. no sympathy for him .. if you're gonna do that, make sure you don't get caught
-
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=tontoz]Charles was never arrested or charged with anything. Not comparable.
There are plenty of people who get guns pulled on them who haven't done anything wrong. Not many of them can fight back. Some get killed.[/QUOTE]
Even if he wasnt charged the guy would have been fired. In fact I believe he was fired before they learned of the charges. People dont want violent people in corporate environments.
I have seen people fired for a variety of reasons. I am sure that tossing someone out of a second story window would have gotten anyone fired. the only exceptions being family of partners or extremely talented people that are worth the trouble.
Our company has let people go for going into debt. It wasn't the official reason but everyone knows that is why they got fired.
Edit: Jobs arent a right, they are a privilege. People get fired all the time for factors outside their control.
-
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=AlphaWolf24]( watching the trial...looking at the evidence)
GZ claimed that TM ran/skipped/hastly walked away from him.....GZ couldn't see TM anymore....
GZ was already otside of his vehicle when th dispatcher said " we don't need you to follow him".....so GZ walked down the sidewalk to see what address he was closest to ( so he could tell police when they arrived) [/quote]
You are also speaking to what a complete idiot this guy was. His car was parked on the biggest street, the main transit street in his THREE street community he lived in. He also did not know the block he and Trayvon fought on which is only 30 feet from his house.
He was 5 seconds away from his vehicle and 15 feet away from an address. When he got out the car. It was another one of his lies. Compounded by another lie that Trayvon came out of the bushes and attacked him right after his phone call. Compounded by his whole lying of events. He was pursing him with his flash light.
[quote]
GZ didn't try to " go after TM" ...( according to GZ testimony / the missing 4 minutes TM had to go home[/QUOTE]
Well apparently the complex is very hard to find your way around. It has forgettable street names and difficult numbering systems. How do you know he went home?
-
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=oh the horror]What's funny to me is your general Caucasian going on about blacks and violence.
My white fellows do you forget your nature?
Hahaha, umm the Crusades, Slavery, Trail of Tears, The Aztecs, Hitler, Manson, McVeigh....most serial killers infamous are whites....I could go on and on...
You founded this country on blood and murdering while taking from native Americans kiddos.
This is a prime example of "white privilege". The whole "I've never really lived it so it doesn't exist" shit you dudes pull
Don't talk to me like racism and profiling is a conspiracy theory. How DARE you sit there ignorantly blowing out of your mealy mouths. I'm a person with BROWN skin that lived it for years. My family moved me to "better" neighborhoods for a good life and was constantly reminded about MY skin color by the law or even local white people.
You don't know wtf you're talking about.[/QUOTE]
damn, i guess because i'm white it's in my nature to be a murderer. definitely moreso than any other race. watch out everybody, i'm an evil sadistic racist murderer. i'm coming for you blacks and hispanics and asians
-
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=Quizno]damn, i guess because i'm white it's in my nature to be a murderer. definitely moreso than any other race. watch out everybody, i'm an evil sadistic racist murderer. i'm coming for you blacks and hispanics and asians[/QUOTE]
Frankly I couldnt care less what you have to say dude. Or anyone one of you for that matter.
History is what it is. And still continues on.
Sarcasm isn't saving anyone.
-
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=oh the horror]Frankly I couldnt care less what you have to say dude. Or anyone one of you for that matter.
History is what it is. And still continues on.
Sarcasm isn't saving anyone.[/QUOTE]
You seem to be deflecting from the PRESENT and focusing on THE PAST. Currently latinos and blacks are going through their murderous phases. Christians/Whites went through their own and thanks to it matured and grew wiser. Now it's the turn for others.
Right now what's going on in Africa, Middle East and Southern America is what's concerning, not what white people did centuries ago. But you can continue to be ignorant and use that whole "well at least we are not as bad as those guys were before I was even born" defense. :oldlol:
-
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=oh the horror]What's funny to me is your general Caucasian going on about blacks and violence.
My white fellows do you forget your nature?
Hahaha, umm the Crusades, Slavery, Trail of Tears, The Aztecs, Hitler, Manson, McVeigh....most serial killers infamous are whites....I could go on and on...
You founded this country on blood and murdering while taking from native Americans kiddos.
This is a prime example of "white privilege". The whole "I've never really lived it so it doesn't exist" shit you dudes pull
Don't talk to me like racism and profiling is a conspiracy theory. How DARE you sit there ignorantly blowing out of your mealy mouths. I'm a person with BROWN skin that lived it for years. My family moved me to "better" neighborhoods for a good life and was constantly reminded about MY skin color by the law or even local white people.
You don't know wtf you're talking about.[/QUOTE]
This is by far one of the dumbest things I have ever read.