Printable View
Jordan is better than Kobe. Seriously, how many times do we have to go through this Kobe 81 and Jordan 69 business? We all know that Jordan would have 200 points in a game or something like that compared to Kobe's measley 81 points in a game with versus one of the ****tiest teams in the entire universe on top of that and with Jordan facing the best team with basketball abilities in equivilance to God.
(sorry, belvedaire is very good)
"Measly 81 points" :roll: These haters are pathetic, yeah Jordan would score 200, no wait 2000, ain't nothing for him cause he's God right? Jordan handjobber. :roll:
[QUOTE=04mzwach]Jordan is better than Kobe. Seriously, how many times do we have to go through this Kobe 81 and Jordan 69 business? We all know that Jordan would have 200 points in a game or something like that compared to Kobe's measley 81 points in a game with versus one of the ****tiest teams in the entire universe on top of that and with Jordan facing the best team with basketball abilities in equivilance to God.
(sorry, belvedaire is very good)[/QUOTE]
you're pathetic. playing the "if" game. bottom line is 81>69. To belive that jordan's 69 is better than kobe's 81 is fine and is legit but to play the "if" game and downplay kobe's performance is ridiculous.
And here comes Loki with the efficiency stats........
Haters are so ****in pathetic. Always have to take things away from Kobe.
Kobe scored 81..Jordan didn't..deal with it.
Jordan is the greatest ever but Kobe scored more. He also should've scored more than 69 against Dallas.
Jordan thinks Kobe's the best right now..rightfully so.
im not hating here. Kobe scored 81, MJ didnt. the real qustion is...if MJ took that many more shots, would he have scored more than 81? the reason i think MJ's performance was more impressive was because of what else he did besides scoring. nothing wrong with that..
[QUOTE]Better overall numbers(18 rebs, 6 assists, 4 stls and 1 blk) against a playoff team.[/QUOTE]
OMG, a PLAYOFF team guys...a PLAYOFF team, I recall Kobe dropping 62 points in THREE quarters on the western conference championsions last season...that's more impressive then 81 or 69 by Jordan to me.
Jordan had the better overall game, Kobe obviously had a more impressive scoring night...I mean scoring 11 points above the 69 mark while mentaining the same FG avg as Jordan is amazing...I don't care what y'all say about Kobe, Dirk drops 70 points next season and he'll be more impressive as well to y'all. You guys love to bring the handcheck crap into this discussion, yet can someone care to explain why teams scored significantly more in those days? So I can just as easily say that Kobe could drop 40 PPG playing in the 90's...can't I? I mean I'm playing your game....but, if, and....right?
[QUOTE=Targus™]im not hating here. Kobe scored 81, MJ didnt. the real qustion is...if MJ took that many more shots, would he have scored more than 81? the reason i think MJ's performance was more impressive was because of what else he did besides scoring. nothing wrong with that..[/QUOTE]
got no problem with that, its the idiots that say sh!t like "kobe's measley 81" that gets to me and "if jordan played today he'd avg 50". I mean WTF...i luv MJ but this sh!t pisses me off
Yeah MJ had a better all-around game because of the 18 rebounds, no one is denying that. But if you are going to say what would have happened IF MJ took 9 more shots (which he'd have to make 6 of them to tie it up) then you could also say what would have happened if Kobe's 81 point game went into overtime! The point is, everyone can play the IF game, especially if you want to bring in Kobe's 62 point game in this too!
Jordan took 37 shots and he needed overtime to score 69. So basically, Kobe took 9 shots more, scored 12 poins more and he did it in less time.
Why do people always use WHAT IF excuses and arguments when they talk about Kobe? It's always the same. People just want to take things away from him. It's disrespectful and unfair.
81 is huge. measley and 81 dont belong in the same sentence when it comes to this. how many players can say theyve scored 81 points?
[QUOTE]Kobe scored 81, MJ didnt. the real qustion is...if MJ took that many more shots, would he have scored more than 81? [/QUOTE]
Retarded statement, you didn't notice Kobe shooting 63% to Jordan's 62%? Kobe took the extra shots but he was on pace anyways...not like he scored 80 points while shooting 45%...he shot BETTER then Jordan that night while worrying about SCORING because his team was behind like 20 points...I don't remember that night Jordan scored 69, was his team in the same situation where he had to score? I can't recall...Kobe is the most IMPRESSIVE shooting performance in league HISTORY...there has been some better games by individuals no doubt about it...but Kobe's 81 is more impressive then Wilt's 100 simply because of the weak ass era Wilt played in, and he was a center who was a giant compare to other players...and only like 12 teams existed back in the day, no? Not much competition.
[QUOTE=LakersDynasty]Let's not forget Kobe also scored 62 in 3 quarters and outscored an NBA Finals team.
62 in 3 quarters or 69 in [B]overtime[/B]?[/QUOTE]
in double overtime, wasnt it?
[QUOTE=LakersDynasty]Yeah MJ had a better all-around game because of the 18 rebounds, no one is denying that. But if you are going to say what would have happened IF MJ took 9 more shots (which he'd have to make 6 of them to tie it up) then you could also say what would have happened if Kobe's 81 point game went into overtime! The point is, everyone can play the IF game, especially if you want to bring in Kobe's 62 point game in this too![/QUOTE]
Good post. However it seems that WHAT IF is only used to minimize Kobe.
Yeah, WHAT IF that 81 point game went into overtime? Yeah, what if?
Stop it, idiots. What if doesn't count.. :hammerhead:
[QUOTE]"if jordan played today he'd avg 50". [/QUOTE]
:roll: Don't even get mad over these statements bro, these guys got half a brain...I mean it's simple math, teams in the past scored more points then today...yet somehow Jordan will avg 20 more options while teams score less each game.
Makes a sh*t load of sense to me.