Baller234 is the stupidest poster in ISH History when it comes to politics

[IMG]https://i.ibb.co/Fzknqt6/fatrick2.jpg[/IMG]

Fatrick, this is you, dude. No woman is going near you, you look like almost exactly like Brendan Fraser in the Whale.

[QUOTE=Patrick Chewing;14854667]I talk to women every day. You spend your entire life on ISH talking about Communism and Anarchy and look like this:


[IMG]https://i.ibb.co/52Y1LN1/77-B16-AB3-50-E6-4634-9430-4-D9561808-C0-A.jpg[/IMG]


There is no way you are having every day sex with a woman, much less conversing with one.[/QUOTE]

if he ever approached a real woman he would get pepper sprayed within 10 seconds


“H-h-hey there do you have a moment? I would like to talk to you about anarcho communism”

*spraying noises*

“[I]I knew you were a facist!!![/I]”

[QUOTE=Baller234;14854669]"trans women are women..."

[B]"okay, would you have sex with one?..."[/B]

"well no, i'm only attracted to women..."


i dunno RRR3, sure sounds like you're contradicting yourself here.[/QUOTE]

lmao

[QUOTE=RRR3;14854671]See no one has said cis women and trans women are the same thing. You continuously create strawmen arguments. Shawkfactory has explained numerous times to you the difference between gender and sex.[/QUOTE]

well by cis woman i suppose you are referring to an actual woman.

is a trans woman not an actual woman?

[QUOTE=RRR3;14854671]. Shawkfactory has explained numerous times to you the difference between gender and sex.[/QUOTE]

but of course... 'gender' is male or female. 'sex' is something you don't and will never have.

...unless you're bottoming for a femboy in the back of the library.

[url]http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/showthread.php?471240-RRR3-says-he-d-date-a-transgender&p=13796165&viewfull=1#post13796165[/url]


[QUOTE=RRR3;13796165]Iirc I said it was possible I’d be attracted to a trans person, but funny how you’re so triggered you made a thread over me.[/QUOTE]

:roll:

[QUOTE=RRR3;14854671]See no one has said cis women and trans women are the same thing. [/QUOTE]

well then fucc. what is the definition of a woman that isn't a woman???

[QUOTE=warriorfan;14854675]if he ever approached a real woman he would get pepper sprayed within 10 seconds


“H-h-hey there do you have a moment? I would like to talk to you about anarcho communism”

*spraying noises*

“[I]I knew you were a facist!!![/I]”[/QUOTE]

RRR3 in a nutshell

[video=youtube;oliq8m8Qph0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oliq8m8Qph0[/video]

:oldlol:

I literally posted a picture of me with my ex-girlfriend on here back in like 2012 :lol It's how people first got my pic. Y'all are welcome to do the same but we all know you can't.

whenever i see people RRR3 trip over themselves to defend gender identity idealogy, i am always reminded of the sokal hoax.

[url]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sokal_affair[/url]

in short, a physics professor fooled prominent universities into publishing a phony editorial that was filled with nonsense because the language used played to their feelings and their politics.

[quote]Sokal submitted an article to Social Text, an academic journal of cultural studies. The submission was an experiment to test the journal's intellectual rigor, specifically to investigate whether "a leading North American journal of cultural studies—whose editorial collective includes such luminaries as Fredric Jameson and Andrew Ross—[would] publish an article liberally salted with nonsense if (a) it sounded good and (b) it flattered the editors' ideological preconceptions."[2]

The article, "Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity",[3] was published in the journal's spring/summer 1996 "Science Wars" issue. It proposed that quantum gravity is a social and linguistic construct. The journal did not practice academic peer review and it did not submit the article for outside expert review by a physicist.[3][4] Three weeks after its publication in May 1996, Sokal revealed in the magazine Lingua Franca that the article was a hoax.[2] [/quote]

that is the gender identity movement and people like RRR3 in a nutshell. believing in gender identity allows him to engage in performative anti-bigotry, which is ultimately his favorite pastime.

Balls[SIZE=2]a[/SIZE]ck234 brings up the topic of gender identity in every thread RRR3 is in :oldlol:

He's definitely more pressed about the topic more than anyone here

[QUOTE=SaltyMeatballs;14854760]Balls[SIZE=2]a[/SIZE]ck234 brings up the topic of gender identity in every thread RRR3 is in :oldlol:

He's definitely more pressed about the topic more than anyone here[/QUOTE]

I only bring it up because he tried to insult me for agreeing with Matt Walsh. If agreeing with Walsh on a given topic makes my opinion null and void, then surely not knowing what a woman is makes his opinions null and void. I can play this game all day.

People like you and RRR3 deserve to have that qualifier attached to your posts. People that engage with you should know the type of confused individuals they're dealing with.

[QUOTE=Baller234;14854767]I only bring it up because he tried to insult me for agreeing with Matt Walsh. If agreeing with Walsh on a given topic makes my opinion null and void, then surely not knowing what a woman is makes his opinions null and void. I can play this game all day.

People like you and RRR3 deserve to have that qualifier attached to your posts. People that engage with you should know the type of confused individuals they're dealing with.[/QUOTE]

What makes you think I'm a confused individual?

[QUOTE=SaltyMeatballs;14854771]What makes you think I'm a confused individual?[/QUOTE]

Because you're aligned with RRR3?

Because you don't see the absurdity in pretending that a man and a woman are the same thing?

[QUOTE=Baller234;14854786]Because you're aligned with RRR3?

Because you don't see the absurdity in pretending that a man and a woman are the same thing?[/QUOTE]

Where did I imply that I think a man and a woman are the same thing? Please show me :oldlol: