"They Are Lying About Charlie Kirk" - Candice Owens

[QUOTE=AlternativeAcc.;15034600]Its a pretty cut and dry case. The texts are real and there's no reason the prosecutors would present them In a court of law if they were fake. They will be easily verified and vetted.

There is zero room for a conspiracy here, but not shocking to see low IQ podcasters insert themselves in the drama of a conspiracy for views.[/QUOTE]



I disagree... not necessarily on the texts, but that Candace is doing this for views. They absolutely were very close friends, that's undeniable ..... and she's calling bull$hit on the official story.

This is wholeheartedly in my opinion starting to very much look like a conspiracy, and there absolutely is room for it right here and right now....

Nobody gives a $hit about a conspiracy that is exposed years down the road. It needs to be exposed as the events are unfolding.

JFK, RFK, MLK.... all have room for conspiracy, but it's too late for all that talk.

Oswald was 100% not the one who fired the shot... would've been nice to see him defend himself in the court of law if he wasn't taken out by Jacob Leon Rubenstein (aka Ruby)

[video=youtube;eXaAd-Oqb8w]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXaAd-Oqb8w[/video]

[video=youtube;9gIkz60kih8]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9gIkz60kih8[/video]

[QUOTE=Doomsday Dallas;15034603]I disagree... not necessarily on the texts, but that Candace is doing this for views. They absolutely were very close friends, that's undeniable ..... and she's calling bull$hit on the official story.

This is wholeheartedly in my opinion starting to very much look like a conspiracy, and there absolutely is room for it right here and right now....

Nobody gives a $hit about a conspiracy that is exposed years down the road. It needs to be exposed as the events are unfolding.

JFK, RFK, MLK.... all have room for conspiracy, but it's too late for all that talk.

Oswald was 100% not the one who fired the shot... would've been nice to see him defend himself in the court of law if he wasn't taken out by Jacob Leon Rubenstein (aka Ruby)[/QUOTE]

I think Candace Owen's is genuinely retarded so there may not be a conscious effort on her part doing it for views. But regardless, whatever she's saying is complete nonsense.

The evidence is clear and it's extremely cut and dry. They're gonna have a trial and it's all gonna be wrapped up and all you conspiracy dudes are gonna be here with your ***** in your hands like always.

I am curious - what's the alternative story at this point? Who was the real killer and why? Something something Isreal? None of it makes ****ing sense lol. The **** is wrong with you guys.

[QUOTE=AlternativeAcc.;15034605]I think Candace Owen's is genuinely retarded so there may not be a conscious effort on her part doing it for views. But regardless, whatever she's saying is complete nonsense.

The evidence is clear and it's extremely cut and dry. They're gonna have a trial and it's all gonna be wrapped up and all you conspiracy dudes are gonna be here with your ***** in your hands like always.

I am curious - what's the alternative story at this point? Who was the real killer and why? Something something Isreal? None of it makes ****ing sense lol. The **** is wrong with you guys.[/QUOTE]




Yea.... Epstein certainly left us with our d*ck in our hands... how's that explanation working out for you? That one sitting well with you right now?

Epstein issue cut & dry too?

[QUOTE=Doomsday Dallas;15034606]Yea.... Epstein certainly left us with our d*ck in our hands... how's that explanation working out for you? That one sitting well with you right now?

Epstein issue cut & dry too?[/QUOTE]
I mean, he clearly did because there's no evidence either way for any of the Epstein nonsense. The guy ****ed underage girls and had a lot of celebrity friends. He found a way to murk himself in prison. Who gives a ****? Lmao. The world needs to move on from this shit. The Epstein files are likely a nothing burger. But you'll have to update me on what exactly you're referring to in regards to Epstein and what it has to do with this autistic kid who shot Charlie Kirk


So no I wouldn't say there's much cut and dry about the Epstein stuff because it's all saddled in vague implications that lead to nothing and nowhere and fuel an endless loop of gay conspiracy talk, which makes you rock hard I'm sure.


But JFK, RFK, moon landing, 9/11, sandy hook, and Charlie Kirk are unbelievably cut and dry.

All I'm gathering from your posts is that you're extremely anti-conspiracy... and not very informed, like at all.


[QUOTE=AlternativeAcc.;15034607]But you'll have to update me on what exactly you're referring to in regards to Epstein[/QUOTE]



just something the entire world has been discussing the last couple of months.... maybe you weren't aware of the issue.


[video=youtube_share;wAORUeUd06o]https://youtu.be/wAORUeUd06o[/video]

[QUOTE=Doomsday Dallas;15034608]All I'm gathering from your posts is that you're extremely anti-conspiracy... and not very informed, like at all.






just something the entire world has been discussing the last couple of months.... maybe you weren't aware of the issue.


[video=youtube_share;wAORUeUd06o]https://youtu.be/wAORUeUd06o[/video][/QUOTE]

That's it? Trump is a pedophile?

Wow man. Super deep stuff.

I dont believe it, but it's still a lot more believable than than the CIA killing JFK and framing Oswald, or our own government flying planes into the world trade centers and framing a bunch of sand ******s.

See the problem is I'm too informed and I've looked into this stuff. It's all incredibly obvious and the evidence is overwhelming that the official stories are correct.

Notice you didn't provide any alternative scenarios or evidence about the kirk shooting, you just deflected to vague Epstein nonsense. You guys are addicted to attacking official narratives while failing to provide any coherent alternative. It's pretty much a mental illness.

[QUOTE=Patrick Chewing;15034604][video=youtube;eXaAd-Oqb8w]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXaAd-Oqb8w[/video]

[video=youtube;9gIkz60kih8]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9gIkz60kih8[/video][/QUOTE]



I'm gonna defend Candace Owens all the way on this one Patrick. I'm Sorry. She speaks a language I'm familiar with and she was Charlie's close friend.


Whatever she has to say... I'm listening to it.


The Republican Party has now found themselves in the midst of a Civil War.




[video=youtube_share;k3JHDhxqpD4]https://youtu.be/k3JHDhxqpD4[/video]

[QUOTE=AlternativeAcc.;15034609]That's it? Trump is a pedophile?

Wow man. Super deep stuff.

I dont believe it, but it's still a lot more believable than than the CIA killing JFK and framing Oswald, or our own government flying planes into the world trade centers and framing a bunch of sand ******s.

See the problem is I'm too informed and I've looked into this stuff. It's all incredibly obvious and the evidence is overwhelming that the official stories are correct.

[b]Notice you didn't provide any alternative scenarios or evidence about the kirk shooting[/b], you just deflected to vague Epstein nonsense. You guys are addicted to attacking official narratives while failing to provide any coherent alternative. It's pretty much a mental illness.[/QUOTE]



WTF are you talking about?

Candace Owens has about 4 hours of video discussing the subject (which you haven't watched) .... A close friend of Charlie Kirk who has inside info, and is now exploiting Kirk's death for some extra attention? I don't think so.

It's not about providing alternative scenarios.... It's about pointing at all the holes in the story.... everybody but you thinks the texts are fishy. You're in the minority.

The most pro-Israel and anti-conspiracy posters on this forum have agreed the texts are sus.




You do realize Candace and Charlie are very close friends right? So it's not me attacking the narrative this time.... It's Charlie's friend.

[url]https://thetab.com/2025/09/15/he-was-like-a-brother-a-look-at-charlie-kirk-and-candace-owens-long-term-friendship[/url]

[quote]“He was like a brother to me.”[/quote]




SMH at JFK being a cut & dry case. I can't tell if you're trolling on that one. The entire world disagrees.


[img]https://c.tenor.com/G-AV2vcr7bQAAAAd/tenor.gif[/img]

[QUOTE=1987_Lakers;15034597][video=youtube;kNtT5ZYXjog]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kNtT5ZYXjog[/video]

[video=youtube;96gQ0hCxv0E]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96gQ0hCxv0E&t=60s[/video][/QUOTE]




[img]https://c.tenor.com/vMvR0gEolCEAAAAd/tenor.gif[/img]


Case Closed.

Everyone who posts in this forum is ****in stupid. Including me for posting to you ****ing stupid ****wits. Get you shit sorted instead of treating lives like a game

I am open to the possibility that the FBI is lying to us about certain events regarding Kirk's murder, but tying it "Israel" is mush brained woke right nonsense.

For all of you woke right smooth brains, consider for a moment that you are on the same side as degenerate losers like HIGHwhey and 3tard. Two godless, soulless meat freezer IQ simpletons who haven't been right about anything their entire lives. Autistic retards who are on the wrong side of every issue every single time without fail.

The moment I found myself on the same side as either of them, I would take that as a sign that maybe I've lost the plot.

:oldlol:

[QUOTE=Doomsday Dallas;15034611]WTF are you talking about?

Candace Owens has about 4 hours of video discussing the subject (which you haven't watched) .... A close friend of Charlie Kirk who has inside info, and is now exploiting Kirk's death for some extra attention? I don't think so.

It's not about providing alternative scenarios.... It's about pointing at all the holes in the story.... everybody but you thinks the texts are fishy. You're in the minority.

The most pro-Israel and anti-conspiracy posters on this forum have agreed the texts are sus.




You do realize Candace and Charlie are very close friends right? So it's not me attacking the narrative this time.... It's Charlie's friend.

[url]https://thetab.com/2025/09/15/he-was-like-a-brother-a-look-at-charlie-kirk-and-candace-owens-long-term-friendship[/url]






SMH at JFK being a cut & dry case. I can't tell if you're trolling on that one. The entire world disagrees.


[img]https://c.tenor.com/G-AV2vcr7bQAAAAd/tenor.gif[/img][/QUOTE]

The texts were written by an autistic weirdo who is into furry porn and trannies.

Both parties are alive and there is an ongoing investigation and trial - there is absolutely zero reason to fake texts and present them to a court of law when they will be easily verified.

It simply doesn't pass the logic test. There is zero logic in the FBI creating fake texts that are easily verifiable when both Tyler and the tranny are still alive with a pending trial.

You have to be stupid to not understand how insane that would be.

A tranny-loving weirdo who is into furry porn and decided to white knight for his tyranny bf by killing Charlie typing like a weird incel is anything but fishy.

Nobody is going to listen to Candace yell into a microphone about nonsense for 4 hours because she has zero credibility and is a long proven moron.

That's why I was asking you... what are the holes in the story and why are they pushing the official story? I'm genuinely asking. What is the purpose of the conspiracy.

[QUOTE=Doomsday Dallas;15034611]WTF are you talking about?

Candace Owens has about 4 hours of video discussing the subject (which you haven't watched) .... A close friend of Charlie Kirk who has inside info, and is now exploiting Kirk's death for some extra attention? I don't think so.

It's not about providing alternative scenarios.... It's about pointing at all the holes in the story.... everybody but you thinks the texts are fishy. You're in the minority.

The most pro-Israel and anti-conspiracy posters on this forum have agreed the texts are sus.




You do realize Candace and Charlie are very close friends right? So it's not me attacking the narrative this time.... It's Charlie's friend.

[url]https://thetab.com/2025/09/15/he-was-like-a-brother-a-look-at-charlie-kirk-and-candace-owens-long-term-friendship[/url]






SMH at JFK being a cut & dry case. I can't tell if you're trolling on that one. The entire world disagrees.


[img]https://c.tenor.com/G-AV2vcr7bQAAAAd/tenor.gif[/img][/QUOTE]

The texts were written by an autistic weirdo who is into furry porn and trannies.

Both parties are alive and there is an ongoing investigation and trial - there is absolutely zero reason to fake texts and present them to a court of law when they will be easily verified.

It simply doesn't pass the logic test. There is zero logic in the FBI creating fake texts that are easily verifiable when both Tyler and the tranny are still alive with a pending trial.

You have to be stupid to not understand how insane that would be.

A tranny-loving weirdo who is into furry porn and decided to white knight for his tyranny bf by killing Charlie typing like a weird incel is anything but fishy.

Nobody is going to listen to Candace yell into a microphone about nonsense for 4 hours because she has zero credibility and is a long proven moron.

That's why I was asking you... what are the holes in the story and why are they pushing the official story? I'm genuinely asking. What is the purpose of the conspiracy.

Candace just released a picture of Tyler at a Dairy Queen which she claims is just hours after the assassination. Meanwhile there's no actual footage from the surveillance and it's just a photo, and there's no timestamp.

Perhaps Mossad had one of their experts doctor up a fake photo, knowing full well that Candace would latch on out desperation and destroy her own credibility?

:oldlol:

Btw if this turns out to be true and Candace is right I will eat my words, but it's really strange that she would allege the photo was taken at a certain time without giving ANY evidence. For all we know some dairy queen employee recognized the shooter and retrieved camera footage from two weeks ago.

But if it turns out to be nothing and all we have this is random photo, I would really hope that people stop giving her the attention she's craving.