[QUOTE=hotsizzle]in double overtime, wasnt it?[/QUOTE]
It was a double overtime? Damn..
Printable View
[QUOTE=hotsizzle]in double overtime, wasnt it?[/QUOTE]
It was a double overtime? Damn..
what were kobe's stats when he scored 60 something in 3 quarters?
62 pts..8 rebs..0 assts..3 stls on 18-31 shooting
Over 58% shooting, if you can make them at that rate, who's to say you can't take 60 shots a game, can you imagine people complaining about a prime Shaq taking 40 shots and making 25-30 of them?
[QUOTE=hotsizzle]in double overtime, wasnt it?[/QUOTE]
No, the 63-pt game vs. Boston was.
see now thats even more impressive imo. did it in 3 quarters on 18-31.
[QUOTE=ManUtd]It was a double overtime? Damn..[/QUOTE]
my bad, just checked..only one OT
people act like Kobe played against kindergarteners or something.
They threw like three guys at him most of the time and he schooled them all.
Anyone who says Jordan's 69 was better than 81 id ****in retarded because its all numbers. Of course 81 is better. And kobes 81 was NOT better than wilts 100.
****...Must we go back to school to teach u bastardous haters that the DUCK ALWAYS GOES FOR THE BIGGER QUANTITY....
Im pretty sure u guys that say 69>81 failed math for 1 or 2 reasons.
[QUOTE=LakersDynasty]Over 58% shooting, if you can make them at that rate, who's to say you can't take 60 shots a game, can you imagine people complaining about a prime Shaq taking 40 shots and making 25-30 of them?[/QUOTE]
haha well shaq is dominant..kobe is a ball hog:rolleyes:
[QUOTE=lakerfreak]people act like Kobe played against kindergarteners or something.
They threw like three guys at him most of the time and he schooled them all.
Anyone who says Jordan's 69 was better than 81 id ****in retarded because its all numbers. Of course 81 is better. And kobes 81 was NOT better than wilts 100.
****...Must we go back to school to teach u bastardous haters that the DUCK ALWAYS GOES FOR THE BIGGER QUANTITY....
Im pretty sure u guys that say 69>81 failed math for 1 or 2 reasons.[/QUOTE]
well theres definetly an arguement for MJ's 69 point [B][B]game[/B][/B] being better because he added 18 boards to it but 81>69 no matter what you do to it
[QUOTE=lakerfreak]
****...Must we go back to school to teach u bastardous haters that the DUCK ALWAYS GOES FOR THE BIGGER QUANTITY....
.[/QUOTE]
....and I was always told the > was a crocodile :cry:
but really, you've got to see beyond the scoring, yeah he owned him there. but those 16 or w/e rebounds while scoring, yeesh.
[QUOTE=hotsizzle]haha well shaq is dominant..kobe is a ball hog:rolleyes:[/QUOTE]
I'll take all the ballhogs in the world if they can give me 58%/63% shooting on 62/81 points.
[QUOTE=LakersDynasty]I'll take all the ballhogs in the world if they can give me 58%/63% shooting on 62/81 points.[/QUOTE]
yea..but..but...but handchecking rules support perimeter players
[QUOTE=hotsizzle]yea..but..but...but handchecking rules support perimeter players[/QUOTE]
:roll:
[QUOTE=Xplicit]Yeah the point was you totally ignore the subject of handchecking.
Guys like Kobe, Lebron, Wade, etc. score 40 so often noawadays, it's almost not even news anymore when they do it. In the 90's, there werent even half-as-many 40-point occurences.
Bottom line:
Jordan getting abused all game long and still scoring 69, with 18 rebounds >>>>>> Kobe getting 81 with these corny handcheck rules.[/QUOTE]
Now it's true that era of basketball was far more difficult to score in but Jordan was absolutely not being abused, I've seen the game quite a few times and they played straight up on MJ with Ehlo (who he always abused) and Mark Price. Even with the handchecking rules players of today would have theyre way with those players.
Now obviously Jordan had the better allaround game but c'mon it's 8 freakin 1 points, to many of you guys act like it's just a walk in the park. I think it's a shame how so many people try to discredit it when they should just sit back and admire it for what it is, a damn great accomplishment.