Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=Rasheed1]You need a reason to begin profiling.... Its like profiling muslims at the airport. the 911 plane hijacking are the reason officials began profiling muslims.. NYPD profiling muslims because of terrorist attacks[/QUOTE]
Given that there had been a string of home invasions by a black teen, GZ was automatically going to be suspicious of any black teen walking in the neighborhood at night.
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=gigantes]dude77, do you think it is in the cards for you to conduct yourself as an adult one day, and not as a f--king idiot?[/QUOTE]
I'm only mirroring the 'idiots' who are defaming and callling for gz's(innocent man) head .. why don't you ask that same question to those people defaming and falsely calling gz a racist ? oh wait ..
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=tontoz]Because he would have no reason to suspect him other than the fact that he was black. Just walking along a sidewalk is not a reason to be under suspicion.[/QUOTE]
what do you mean he would have no reason to suspect him ? .. are you saying that no black guy can look suspicious ?
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=tontoz]Given that there had been a string of home invasions by a black teen, GZ was automatically going to be suspicious of any black teen walking in the neighborhood at night.[/QUOTE]
exactly and that is racial profiling.. The profile of the criminal is a black person... Just like the profile of the terrorist is muslim..
so you suspect Muslims/Blacks because the people who did the crime were black/muslim too.
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=dude77]you can call it whatever you want .. but there exists different groups with distinct differences .. one of them being the skull .. pure caucasian skulls are different from pure black skulls and pure eastern asian skulls etc .. also certain groups are more prone to get certain diseases and such .. it's not that simple to say we're just the human race[/QUOTE]
[URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_qaWp8_z81w"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_qaWp8_z81w[/URL]
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=Rasheed1]thats not true.. Zimmerman says himself he was pursuing Martin on the dispatch tape.
There is no evidence that martin pursued Zimmerman..[/QUOTE]
To pursue someone means you have the intent to catch or attack them. Zimmerman never said he was doing that, he said he was following Martin. Martin is the one who initiated a violent confrontation.
It's really quite worrysome that you would misrepresent the facts like that in your head. Zimmerman was pursuing Martin now, by his own account. That's what you actually make yourself believe.
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
I don't know if GZ was prejudiced against blacks before the home invasions. However i think that any white guy who is prejudiced against blacks will be far more likely to become a cop than guys who aren't prejudiced.
I have heard so many stories from black guys being harassed by cops for no reason, there must be something behind it.
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=dude77]what do you mean he would have no reason to suspect him ? .. are you saying that no black guy can look suspicious ?[/QUOTE]
No. I am saying that a guy walking down a sidewalk should not be under suspicion. If it was a white girl walking down the sidewalk it would be unlikely that anyone would think twice about it.
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=dude77]
it does a disservice to humans in general to disregard these differences .. they are there .. they should be acknowledged and studied, not disregarded[/QUOTE]
The minor physical differences humans have are irrelevant. They have no meaning whatsoever except in social constructions.
If the small physical differences you pointed out really were true (which they're not), then they would be consistent in every person of that ethnic group.
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=LJJ]To pursue someone means you have the intent to catch or attack them. Zimmerman never said he was doing that, he said he was following Martin. Martin is the one who initiated a violent confrontation.
It's really quite worrysome that you would misrepresent the facts like that in your head. Zimmerman was pursuing Martin now, by his own account. That's what you actually make yourself believe.[/QUOTE]
you are playing a semantics game.. stop..
He was pursuing him.. He says so on the tape :oldlol: Im not making it up..
If Zimmerman stays in his truck? nothing happens that night..
Martin sure as hell wasnt pursuing Zimmerman.. He was coming from the store.
there is no evidence that Martin ever pursued Zimmerman.. but there is evidence that Zimmerman was pursuing Martin
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=Rasheed1]you are playing a semantics game.. stop..
He was pursuing him.. He says so on the tape :oldlol: Im not making it up..
If Zimmerman stays in his truck? nothing happens that night..
Martin sure as hell wasnt pursuing Zimmerman.. He was coming from the store.
there is no evidence that Martin ever pursued Zimmerman.. but there is evidence that Zimmerman was pursuing Martin[/QUOTE]
Isn't this the transcript: [url]http://www.motherjones.com/documents/326700-full-transcript-zimmerman[/url]
I don't see Zimmerman saying he's pursuing Martin. Shocking that you actually believe Zimmerman said that on the tape, this is how your mind plays tricks on you.
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=tontoz]No. I am saying that a guy walking down a sidewalk should not be under suspicion. If it was a white girl walking down the sidewalk it would be unlikely that anyone would think twice about it.[/QUOTE]
you're gonna be judged on how you look and act .. it's just how it is ..
the example you use with the white girl is the same with a black girl .. a normally dressed black girl walking down the street wouldn't have caught his eye .. neither would a normally dressed black guy who's not acting suspiciously .. he didn't call him in because he saw him 'walking down the sidewalk' ..
and as much as people want to defend him wearing a hoodie .. hoodies are now a tool of criminals .. you should know not to wear it on dark, rainy nights while you're going around standing in front of other peoples' houses .. use your damn heads
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=dude77]I'm only mirroring the 'idiots' who are defaming and callling for gz's(innocent man) head .. why don't you ask that same question to those people defaming and falsely calling gz a racist ? oh wait ..[/QUOTE]
oh wait, nothing... i did that back when i was a zimmerman supporter, although not on this forums so much.
anyway, fine... i see your method, i just don't appreciate it. but my problem, not yours. sorry.
Re: Charles Barkley: Zimmer was right to be acquitted
[QUOTE=chosen_one6]The minor physical differences humans have are irrelevant. They have no meaning whatsoever except in social constructions.
[B]If the small physical differences you pointed out really were true[/B] (which they're not), then they would be consistent in every person of that ethnic group.[/QUOTE]
what are you referring to .. the skull shapes ? .. that's a fact .. this isn't speculation .. I'm talking about pure breeds .. not mixed people