Fatal9...the greatest troll insidehoops has ever seen?
Printable View
Fatal9...the greatest troll insidehoops has ever seen?
[QUOTE=zabuza666]Fatal9...the greatest troll insidehoops has ever seen?[/QUOTE]
Yep and nearly 5000 posts later he still hasn't been banned.
[QUOTE=zabuza666]Fatal9...the greatest troll insidehoops has ever seen?[/QUOTE]
Just report all of his posts. We are going to send this clown back to Hell.
Roundballrock > fatal9
[QUOTE=catch24]Roundballrock > fatal9[/QUOTE]
[img]http://larryfire.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/twoface_31.jpg[/img]
LOL..pretty much
"I have failed hundreds of times, that is why I succeed," - Michael Jordan
I remember an article that said MJ was 33-58 in game winning shots and situations. That is 56% rate.
[QUOTE=Duncan21formvp]I remember an article that said MJ was 33-58 in game winning shots and situations. That is 56% rate.[/QUOTE]
I remember this too. And the same article said Kobe was like 7-32 lol. This was a few years ago though, so I'm sure Kobe's has changed. I'm not going to bother finding the article and citing it since apparently according to this thread we don't really have to.
Anyway, Fatal9 - what exactly is your definition of "anti-clutch?" Is it straight up just missing a game winning shot or a few shots in the end? Or actually choking and not playing up to normal standards? IMO it would be like missing game winning free throws or easy layups, taking bad shots at the end of a game and missing when your teammates are open, letting your team blow big leads, having a bad performances on big stages, not being aggressive when you need to be, etc. Missing a couple of shots at the end of a close game is not anti-clutch IMO. Anti-Clutch IMO is pretty much playing below standards at the end of a close game or overall for a big game. Whichever way it is, today's superstars that you have cited such as Kobe and Lebron are still more anti-clutch then Jordan. So I'm not sure how this proves your point that we shouldn't be so hard on them when they are "anti-clutch," when they are still moreso then Jordan. Either way, most people don't think those guys are anti-clutch.
Everybody failed in the clutch one time or another.
With that said, this is a good thread. We also need another one for Kobe.
[QUOTE=Fatal9]I have a New York Times subscription because I get that delivered to my house. Do you? That's what I thought. Buy yourself some games, watch them, or better yet buy yourself a subscription to a reputable newspaper to confirm this.
[/QUOTE]
Ummm so what does this mean? Do you just have New York Times newspapers since 1984 just laying around in your house? Cause that would be weird and your house would probably be overflowing by now.
[QUOTE=guy]I remember this too. And the same article said Kobe was like 7-32 lol. This was a few years ago though, so I'm sure Kobe's has changed. I'm not going to bother finding the article and citing it since apparently according to this thread we don't really have to.
[/QUOTE]
If he was 7-32 at that time, he has since went 7-24 (29.2%). At least until February 4th of this past season.
[QUOTE=guy]Ummm so what does this mean? Do you just have New York Times newspapers since 1984 just laying around in your house? Cause that would be weird and your house would probably be overflowing by now.[/QUOTE]
:oldlol: at your stupidity. You know they have newspapers on the internet nowadays right?
[QUOTE=Fatal9]:oldlol: at your stupidity. You know they have newspapers on the internet nowadays right?[/QUOTE]
Well you said you have them delivered your house so I thought you meant you had all copies of those. :oldlol: at you actually going through over 1,000 game logs (if you're not actually making this s*** up) to try to look for everytime Jordan missed a shot in a close game. And you say you don't have an agenda? HAHAHAHA. You're pathetic.
[QUOTE=Duncan21formvp]I remember an article that said MJ was 33-58 in game winning shots and situations. That is 56% rate.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=guy]I remember this too. [B]And the same article said Kobe was like 7-32 lol. [/B] This was a few years ago though, so I'm sure Kobe's has changed. I'm not going to bother finding the article and citing it since apparently according to this thread we don't really have to.
Anyway, Fatal9 - what exactly is your definition of "anti-clutch?" Is it straight up just missing a game winning shot or a few shots in the end? Or actually choking and not playing up to normal standards? IMO it would be like missing game winning free throws or easy layups, taking bad shots at the end of a game and missing when your teammates are open, letting your team blow big leads, having a bad performances on big stages, not being aggressive when you need to be, etc. Missing a couple of shots at the end of a close game is not anti-clutch IMO. Anti-Clutch IMO is pretty much playing below standards at the end of a close game or overall for a big game. Whichever way it is, today's superstars that you have cited such as Kobe and Lebron are still more anti-clutch then Jordan. So I'm not sure how this proves your point that we shouldn't be so hard on them when they are "anti-clutch," when they are still moreso then Jordan. Either way, most people don't think those guys are anti-clutch.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=qrich]If he was 7-32 at that time, he has since went 7-24 (29.2%). At least until February 4th of this past season.[/QUOTE]
:eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: