66-67 When Wilt Finally Had a Roster that Equaled Russell's
I have long mainatined that in the '66-67 season, Wilt finally had a roster that EQUALED Russell's.
How about these interesting numbers from the '66-67 EDF's, which was a Philly 4-1 series blowout win...
Philly outscored Boston, per game, in that series, by a 121.2 ppg to 111.2 ppg margin... or +10.0 ppg.
Remove the Wilt-Russell match-up, and Boston held a 101.0 ppg to 99.4 ppg margin... or a -1.6 deficit margin for Philly.
Wilt outscored Russell, per game, by a 21.6 ppg to 10.2 ppg margin... or +11.4 ppg.
Philly outrebounded Boston, per game, by a 67.8 rpg to 60.8 rpg margin... or +7.0 rpg.
Without the Wilt-Russell match-up, and Boston held a 37.4 rpg to 35.8 rpg margin... or a -1.6 rpg deficit margin for Philly.
Wilt outrebounded Russell, per game, by a 32.0 rpg to 23.4 rpg margin... or +9.6 rpg.
Philly outassisted Boston, per game, by a 25.4 apg to 24.4 apg margin... or +1.0 apg.
Without the Wilt-Russell H2H's...Boston held a 18.4 rpg to 15.4 apg margin... or a -3.0 apg deficit margin for Philly.
Wilt outassisted Russell, per game, by a 10.0 apg to 6.0 apg margin... or +4.0 apg.
Philly outshot Boston from the field in that series by a .448 to .403 FG% margin... or +.045.
Without the Wilt-Russell match-up, Philly outshot Boston by a .431 to .408 FG% margin... or +.023.
Wilt outshot Russell from the field in that series by a .556 to .358 FG% margin... or +.198.
Oh, and in their known blocked shots in that series, Chamberlain held a 29-8 margin.
In any case, remove the Wilt-Russell match-ups from that series, and it was basically dead-even.
Include the Wilt-Russell match-ups, and it was a Philly rout across the board.
Re: 66-67 When Wilt Finally Had a Roster that Equaled Russell's
Does Bill Russell have stans?
Re: 66-67 When Wilt Finally Had a Roster that Equaled Russell's
[QUOTE=JohnMax]Does Bill Russell have stans?[/QUOTE]
go to boston and look around
Re: 66-67 When Wilt Finally Had a Roster that Equaled Russell's
Re: 66-67 When Wilt Finally Had a Roster that Equaled Russell's
We are in 2015, i don't give a shit!
Re: 66-67 When Wilt Finally Had a Roster that Equaled Russell's
[QUOTE=JohnMax]Does Bill Russell have stans?[/QUOTE]
Bill Simmons is one...
Not that that is saying much of anything.
Re: 66-67 When Wilt Finally Had a Roster that Equaled Russell's
[QUOTE=nba_55]We are in 2015, i don't give a shit![/QUOTE]
Thanks for taking the time to read the topic and also reply to it...
Re: 66-67 When Wilt Finally Had a Roster that Equaled Russell's
[QUOTE=Uncle Drew]11 vs 2.[/QUOTE]
1-0 When Wilt had an EQUAL roster, that was healthy. And BTW, it wasn't even close, either. In fact, Philly was a four point loss away in game four, from a SWEEP.
Re: 66-67 When Wilt Finally Had a Roster that Equaled Russell's
[QUOTE=LAZERUSS]Thanks for taking the time to read the topic and also reply to it...[/QUOTE]
You think I read that shit! :roll: :roll: :roll:
Re: 66-67 When Wilt Finally Had a Roster that Equaled Russell's
[QUOTE=LAZERUSS]1-0 When Wilt had an EQUAL roster, that was healthy.[/QUOTE]
[IMG]http://cjzero.com/gifs/YawningBillRussell.gif[/IMG]
11-2.
Re: 66-67 When Wilt Finally Had a Roster that Equaled Russell's
[QUOTE=nba_55]You think I read that shit! :roll: :roll: :roll:[/QUOTE]
I doubt you can...
Re: 66-67 When Wilt Finally Had a Roster that Equaled Russell's
[QUOTE=LAZERUSS]I doubt you can...[/QUOTE]
You right! I don't have the patience to sit and read those useless texts, grandpa! I've got more fun things to do.
Re: 66-67 When Wilt Finally Had a Roster that Equaled Russell's
[QUOTE=nba_55]You right! I don't have the patience to sit and read those useless texts, grandpa! I've got more fun things to do.[/QUOTE]
Well, thanks for taking the time out of your busy day to comment on them, anyway...
Re: 66-67 When Wilt Finally Had a Roster that Equaled Russell's
[QUOTE=LAZERUSS]Well, thanks for taking the time out of your busy day to comment on them, anyway...[/QUOTE]
I am not busy. I am just having fun making fun of you, grandpappy!
Re: 66-67 When Wilt Finally Had a Roster that Equaled Russell's
[url]http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/showthread.php?t=317843[/url]
:applause: