in an 82 game season?
[IMG]https://s11.postimg.org/9u66ptjs3/per.png[/IMG]
Only Chamberlain and Jordan have done it, can non-Gods..human players achieve this?
Printable View
in an 82 game season?
[IMG]https://s11.postimg.org/9u66ptjs3/per.png[/IMG]
Only Chamberlain and Jordan have done it, can non-Gods..human players achieve this?
Lol @ arbitrarily cutting it off at a .70 to fit an agenda.
Means nothing if you aint win the chip that year
In the playoffs:
[IMG]http://picasion.com/resize82/bd98ec4ffa10dafd086b70c5f47a45de.png[/IMG]
[QUOTE=Milbuck]In the playoffs:
[IMG]http://picasion.com/resize82/bd98ec4ffa10dafd086b70c5f47a45de.png[/IMG][/QUOTE]
But where:'s my alien Wilt at? :biggums:
Did you know that PER is adjusted so that the league average for that season is always set at 15.0?
So Wilt getting a 31.70 PER means he's only twice as good as the average unathletic white stiff in the 60's
LeBron getting a 31.67 PER means he's twice as good as a modern professional elite basketball player.
Now tell me, would you rather be twice as good as this guy:
[IMG]http://oi33.tinypic.com/25q817l.jpg[/IMG]
Or these guys
[IMG]https://thebasketballsociety.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/2016-nba-all-star-starters.jpg[/IMG]
:confusedshrug:
[QUOTE=Milbuck]In the playoffs:
[IMG]http://picasion.com/resize82/bd98ec4ffa10dafd086b70c5f47a45de.png[/IMG][/QUOTE]
PER was designed for an 82 game season. Playoffs throws the entire equation out of wack because not everyone is playing the same amount of games, and some playoff series have different pace than others. Chris Paul, Barkley and Westbrook over Kareem is all the proof you need playoff-per is useless.
But this list
[IMG]https://s11.postimg.org/9u66ptjs3/per.png[/IMG]
^^Those are the 10 greatest statistical seasons of all time. Its one of the few times where the math agrees with the general consensus
[QUOTE=Dray n Klay]
Now tell me, would you rather be twice as good as this guy:
[IMG]http://oi33.tinypic.com/25q817l.jpg[/IMG]
Or these guys
[IMG]https://thebasketballsociety.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/2016-nba-all-star-starters.jpg[/IMG]
:confusedshrug:[/QUOTE]
LOL you dont have a single 7 footer in your little all star team. Chamberlain would grab all those little midgets by the Pu*$Y!
[IMG]http://cdn.makeagif.com/media/8-21-2015/bWYe9P.gif[/IMG]
[IMG]http://rs304.pbsrc.com/albums/nn200/nbacardDOTnet/zz%20NBA%20Photo%20Gallery/VS/Rivalry/02%20Stilt%20VS%20Alcindor/2-1.gif~c200[/IMG]
How's his playoff per and stats looking OP.
[QUOTE=Dray n Klay]Did you know that PER is adjusted so that the league average for that season is always set at 15.0?
So Wilt getting a 31.70 PER means he's only twice as good as the average unathletic white stiff in the 60's
LeBron getting a 31.67 PER means he's twice as good as a modern professional elite basketball player.
Now tell me, would you rather be twice as good as this guy:
[IMG]http://oi33.tinypic.com/25q817l.jpg[/IMG]
Or these guys
[IMG]https://thebasketballsociety.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/2016-nba-all-star-starters.jpg[/IMG]
:confusedshrug:[/QUOTE]
DnK spitting truth bombs :applause:
[QUOTE=BlakFrankWhite]DnK spitting truth bombs :applause:[/QUOTE]
OP is right though. There are no 7 footers in that picture. Durant and Bron are the biggest.
The problem with per is it doesn't account for defense...09 Wade > 16 Curry
[QUOTE=Smoke117]The problem with per is it doesn't account for defense...09 Wade > 16 Curry[/QUOTE]
Easily. Anyone who argued otherwise is ... :facepalm
[QUOTE=Smoke117]The problem with per is it doesn't account for defense...09 Wade > 16 Curry[/QUOTE]
No. Curry's 3 point shooting was one of the most impressive feats in NBA history.
[QUOTE=Sarcastic]No. Curry's 3 point shooting was one of the most impressive feats in NBA history.[/QUOTE]
That's all well and good...nice feat...congrats Curry...Wade was still an overall better player. A knicks fan should have a healthy respect for 09 Wade...considering how much he brutalized your team that season.