911 Controlled Demolition Thread

[video=youtube_share;wFJXPE0TWkM]https://youtu.be/wFJXPE0TWkM?list=PLZdhTWJ6YawrxhUFVYNw5U0ZTPyWUnyZ Y[/video]

Points from the video:

[B]The Dust[/B]
There are billions of molten iron microspheres throughout the WTC dust. ([B]Why would that be the case?[/B]) The presence of these spheres is a signature component of the dust, and they are a byproduct of a thermite reaction.

Unignited Nanothermite, a high tech explosive.

Red gray chips contained the exact ingredients of thermite (aluminum and iron oxide) at the nano scale. When ignited in a lab, the chips produced the exact same molten iron microspheres found in the WTC dust.
[B]
The Collapse[/B]
Steel members that appeared to have been partly evaporated (requires 4,000 F+).

The collapse begins abruptly, without any initial warning or structural deformation.

The building fell perfectly straight down, symmetrically, and into its own footprint, which requires simultaneous removal of all core columns. (There were many, many explosions heard after the planes hit and before the collapse, these were destroying core columns.) A fire cannot accomplish that. The building collapsed at the speed of a bowling ball falling from the sky for over a third of its descent. This means that its 40,000 tons of structural steel provided zero resistance, which is physically impossible in a fire induced collapse.

The upper section of the towers did not act as a "pile driver." It was completely destroyed and "telescoped" in on itself within the first few seconds of the collapse, leaving nothing to crush the floors below.

Two thirds of the buildings' mass (the structural steel and the concrete) was ejected outwards or pulverized in mid air and therefore was not available to do the work of crushing the structure below.

Both collapses began suddenly and proceeded in a uniform downward motion. Despite asymmetrical plane impacts and fires, both towers collapsed with complete symmetry.

Massive, multi-ton steel sections were hurled laterally up to 600 feet in every direction, landing in surrounding buildings. These sections were trailed by thick white smoke clouds, which is evidence of thermite reactions.

The 90,000 tons of concrete in each tower were pulverized into a fine powder in midair, not crushed on the ground. And it's explained by the extreme heat of nanothermite.

[IMG]https://images2.imgbox.com/cb/ae/7JHlKtL4_o.jpg[/IMG]
Heavy objects exploding outward, as the concrete turns into dust. That's just not normal.

Bill Gates about to come in with some super low iq attempt to debunk

[IMG]https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-BCr-rUqkZAA/U6lSG54xWyI/AAAAAAAAANw/dDhzhRPEvPw/s1600/Inyustisia.gif[/IMG]

The steel was burning for hours. Hours.

[QUOTE=Patrick Chewing;15032109]The steel was burning for hours. Hours.[/QUOTE]

could you see it from where you were? i'm sure you could at least see all of the smoke.

[QUOTE=diamenz;15032122]could you see it from where you were? i'm sure you could at least see all of the smoke.[/QUOTE]



You could see it for miles. I wasn't working downtown yet, so I was lucky enough to be nowhere in that area. I was up all night with my online courses that I decided to just not go to sleep that night and stay awake and I saw everything unfold as it was happening.

whenever NYC gets discussed regarding 9/11.... and controlled demolition talk....

I quickly point out that the Pentagon is even more suspicious. The Pentagon aka The Department of WAR.



Sorry guys.... The Pentagon was not hit with a Boeing. That's my stance.




what we saw on 9/11 defied the laws of physics... multiple times.

but you're crazy if you don't believe the official story.





Even more suspicious... or should I say comical.... when they got Osama Bin Laden.... they disposed his body in the ocean. How convenient is that?


And then we have Hollywood pounding the narrative to the masses as a TRUE STORY.

They "found" the hijackers passport after the plane hit and the building collapsed.

:lol:facepalm

[video=youtube;0stGWpD6_j0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0stGWpD6_j0&themeRefresh=1[/video]

[QUOTE=1987_Lakers;15032193]They "found" the hijackers passport after the plane hit and the building collapsed.

:lol:facepalm[/QUOTE]

^This guy thinks the moon is a spaceship. :roll: :roll:

[QUOTE=Full Court;15032196]^This guy thinks the moon is a spaceship. :roll: :roll:[/QUOTE]

^This guy was voted dumbest poster in ISH history. :roll:

The biggest flaw with 9/11 being an inside job will always be the fact there would have been literally zero reason for them to have used any planes beyond the original 2 if their goal was to use these events as a justification to invade the Middle East. Knocking down the WTC, which killed the vast majority of people on 9/11 anyway, would've been more than sufficient to accomplish these goals. Having two extra planes that only killed like 200 additional people and weren't even captured on film wouldn't have been worth the extra complications of doubling the operation or risking exposure.

That's the biggest one, the fact that not a single person would've been compelled to blow the whistle on such a colossal event for fame, money, or a guilty conscience is another. Or the fact they invaded Iraq on the pretense of having WMD's then claiming they didn't have any makes absolutely zero sense.

[QUOTE=Doomsday Dallas;15032169]whenever NYC gets discussed regarding 9/11.... and controlled demolition talk....

I quickly point out that the Pentagon is even more suspicious. The Pentagon aka The Department of WAR.



Sorry guys.... The Pentagon was not hit with a Boeing. That's my stance.




what we saw on 9/11 defied the laws of physics... multiple times.

but you're crazy if you don't believe the official story.





Even more suspicious... or should I say comical.... when they got Osama Bin Laden.... they disposed his body in the ocean. How convenient is that?


And then we have Hollywood pounding the narrative to the masses as a TRUE STORY.[/QUOTE]

The flight path of the pentagon flight is ridiculous.

[QUOTE] After descending from 35,000 feet, it made a wide, 330-degree spiral, clockwise turn. The plane then descended towards the Pentagon, striking its western flank at a ~42-degree angle at 9:37:46 AM[/QUOTE]

There are lots of very odd things about that day but the hijackers being able to execute this move at that altitudes and speed and accuracy seems so far fetched given the reports about the suicide pilots skill level.

[QUOTE=SouBeachTalents;15032212]The biggest flaw with 9/11 being an inside job will always be the fact there would have been literally zero reason for them to have used any planes beyond the original 2 if their goal was to use these events as a justification to invade the Middle East. Knocking down the WTC, which killed the vast majority of people on 9/11 anyway, would've been more than sufficient to accomplish these goals. Having two extra planes that only killed like 200 additional people and weren't even captured on film wouldn't have been worth the extra complications of doubling the operation or risking exposure.

That's the biggest one, the fact that not a single person would've been compelled to blow the whistle on such a colossal event for fame, money, or a guilty conscience is another. [B]Or the fact they invaded Iraq on the pretense of having WMD's then claiming they didn't have any makes absolutely zero sense.[/B][/QUOTE]

9/11 worked because at that point most people didn’t even care there were no WMD’s. They got whipped up in a frenzy like designed.

Going by your logic, if the Pentagon attack was totally unnecessary if you were taking down the towers…Why would Al Queda try to do it if we are going by the official story?

As for whistle blowers? Compartmentalization mixed with 2 choices, take the money and be quiet or try to stir things up and potentially lose everything including you and your family’s safety.

Meanwhile everyone in the conspiracy theory space only cares about Epstein, JFK, the Clinton’s, immigrants, and pedo’s.

The 911 truth movement literally died with Trump.