More strange coincidences from Sandy Hook

[IMG]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/files/img/ro50d20d74.jpg[/IMG]

This is some weird stuff. Check out this movie [URL="http://aslashabove.com/2012/07/20/sandy-hook-lingerie-party-massacre-2000-review/"]review.[/URL] Now consider the amount of coincidences relating to all the major events that have happened recently. Keep in mind this movie was made about a decade ago and someone just so happens to do a review on it on the day of the Aurora massacre. Too weird. Not proclaiming anything other than the weirdness factor, but it sure caught my attention.


1 - In the movie "The Dark Knight Rises" there is a STRIKE in a district called SANDY HOOK


2 - In the premiere of the movie "The Dark Knight Rises", on July 20, 2012, there was a massacre in a theater in Aurora, Colorado.


3 - In the same day, July 20, 2012, someone posted a review about a horror movie called SANDY HOOK Lingerie Party Massacre in a blog, and the review starts with the following: "So here we have Sandy Hook Lingerie Party Massacre. Let’s say that again, SANDY HOOK LINGERIE PARTY MASSACRE! What do you think of when you see that combination of words? What’s in a title anyway? Does it have a cryptic meaning? Who is Sandy Hook? What on earth am I writing about?"

4 - In the horror movie in question, SANDY HOOK Lingerie Party Massacre, from the year 2000, the plot says there is a serial killer who strikes AFTER hurricanes.


5 - There was a very strong hurricane in November 2012, called Hurricane SANDY, that affected the whole Northeast of the USA, including both the town of Sandy Hook, in New Jersey (where the horror movie is supposed to take place) and the village of Sandy Hook, in Newtown, Connecticut.


6 - Less than one month and a half AFTER Hurricane Sandy, a serial killer enters SANDY HOOK Elementary School, in the village of SANDY HOOK, in Newtown, Connecticut, and kills dozens of little kids in a horrible massacre

Eh, I don't think so. Big coincidence.

[IMG]http://cdn.memegenerator.net/instances/400x/28416502.jpg[/IMG]

I think I see your point...

[IMG]http://www.tomaski.it/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/bel.jpg[/IMG]



[IMG]http://images.wikia.com/spongebob/images/6/65/Sandy-cheeks-spongebob.jpg[/IMG]


It's all her fault ain't it?

[QUOTE=D-Rose]Eh, I don't think so. Big coincidence.[/QUOTE]


thats a pretty big coincidence.... someone rights an article on a movie with sandy hook in the title and comments about the massacre being in the title. and the movie has a killer that attacks after hurricanes


and in real life, after hurricane sandy blows over and the media stops commenting on it... a killer massacres people in sandy hook?

and there was a reference to sandy hook in a movie that happened to have a massacre of its own.

also the review says nothing about a hurricane... just a storm.


kinda weird.


but then again people make up alot of bullshit when it comes to conspiracies.

According to IMDB, it is one of the worst movies ever

[IMG]https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-UrcLJTWgHVw/UM-SeHpL1nI/AAAAAAAAFFA/24jfOshTwXs/s640/aurora_2.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://static.infowars.com/slideshow/sandyhook.jpg[/IMG]

Both images from the Dark Knight Rises movie.

What does a lingerie party have to do with an elementary school?

[QUOTE=IamRAMBO24][IMG]https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-UrcLJTWgHVw/UM-SeHpL1nI/AAAAAAAAFFA/24jfOshTwXs/s640/aurora_2.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://static.infowars.com/slideshow/sandyhook.jpg[/IMG]

Both images from the Dark Knight Rises movie.[/QUOTE]


yah, thats actually pretty sketchy.

what are the chances that two cities that had massacres would be referenced in the movie.

one of which happened during a showing of said movie.

[QUOTE=LBJMVP]yah, thats actually pretty sketchy.

what are the chances that two cities that had massacres would be referenced in the movie.

one of which happened during a showing of said movie.[/QUOTE]

1 in a million.

[QUOTE=Sarcastic]What does a lingerie party have to do with an elementary school?[/QUOTE]

"So here we have Sandy Hook Lingerie Party Massacre. Let

[QUOTE=IamRAMBO24]Both images from the Dark Knight Rises movie.[/QUOTE]

Yes it is almost like they used names of real towns for names of fake ones. Could you imagine if there was a shooting in a town called Springfield!? The Simpsons predicted it!

Judgement shall be passed soon.

[QUOTE=miller-time]Yes it is almost like they used names of real towns for names of fake ones. Could you imagine if there was a shooting in a town called Springfield!? The Simpsons predicted it![/QUOTE]


I once saw a movie where a guy got shot in New York. Since then, a ton of people have been shot in New York. Coincidence??? I think not!!


This is right in front of our eyes, people! The Earth is square and Illuminati lives!!!

[QUOTE=miller-time]Yes it is almost like they used names of real towns for names of fake ones. Could you imagine if there was a shooting in a town called Springfield!? The Simpsons predicted it![/QUOTE]

Stop being so dense.

It is no secret the purpose of the CIA is to pull staged events in foreign countries to carry out an agenda.

What makes you think they can't do the same on our soil to push an agenda ..

That's their job; they destroy foreign countries through covert means. The government obviously has an agenda (aka motive), it is a fact the CIA does this kind of stuff overseas, so why is it so hard to believe they can't do it on american soil .. it is covert; nobody knows about it; they can get away with it; so why is it not plausible they will pull a stunt like this over here.

Stop being so dense.

[QUOTE=IamRAMBO24]Stop being so dense.

It is no secret the purpose of the CIA is to pull staged events in foreign countries to carry out an agenda.

What makes you think they can't do the same on our soil to push an agenda ..

That's their job; they destroy foreign countries through covert means. The government obviously has an agenda (aka motive), it is a fact the CIA does this kind of stuff overseas, so why is it so hard to believe they can't do it on american soil .. it is covert; nobody knows about it; they can get away with it; so why is it not plausible they will pull a stunt like this over here.

Stop being so dense.[/QUOTE]

Because when the CIA do it overseas they don't ring up the local film studios to put stupid references to their atrocities in their films.

[QUOTE=miller-time]Because when the CIA do it overseas they don't ring up the local film studios to put stupid references to their atrocities in their films.[/QUOTE]

You are f*ckin dense if you don't believe there are coded references in popular movies. The facts are there: there are numerous cryptic references to 9/11 in major movies way before it happened.

But you are dense and is prob incapable of digging a bit deeper in the critical aspect of your brain.

Leave this f*ckin thread alone. Can't us conspiracy nuts have our fun without you **** f*cks raining on the parade. A*shole.

[QUOTE=IamRAMBO24]Leave this f*ckin thread alone. Can't us conspiracy nuts have our fun without you **** f*cks raining on the parade. A*shole.[/QUOTE]

No because there a people that will read your trash and believe it too. Either you defend your premise or you can f[COLOR="Black"]u[/COLOR]ck off.

[QUOTE=miller-time]Yes it is almost like they used names of real towns for names of fake ones. Could you imagine if there was a shooting in a town called Springfield!? The Simpsons predicted it![/QUOTE]

yah, but aurora and sandy hook both being used in the movie?

two pretty random cities and both have mass killings in them and one was during a showing of the movie?


it could be a coincidence, but that is one hell of a coincidence.


lets not compare this to seeing a movie where someone gets shot in new york and then people actually get shot in new york... not really close to the same level of coincidence

[QUOTE=miller-time]No because there a people that will read your trash and believe it too. Either you defend your premise or you can f[COLOR="Black"]u[/COLOR]ck off.[/QUOTE]

F*ck you Aussie boy.

We're just having fun here exercising a bit of critical thinking. Why do you have to be so serious Aussie boy .. stop raining on the parade. Did Obama elect you as "**** President Loser of the the anti-conspiracy club." What is wrong with a bit of denial and asking questions .. stop being such a close minded queeeer.

Creepy.

[QUOTE=IamRAMBO24]F*ck you Aussie boy.

We're just having fun here exercising a bit of critical thinking. Why do you have to be so serious Aussie boy .. stop raining on the parade. Did Obama elect you as "**** President Loser of the the anti-conspiracy club." What is wrong with a bit of denial and asking questions .. stop being such a close minded queeeer.[/QUOTE]

Critical thinking? More like no thinking at all.

[QUOTE=Lebowsky]Critical thinking? More like no thinking at all.[/QUOTE]

It's kinda funny that THIS is considered "critical thinking", but those of us who have [I]actually thought about it[/I] and (rightly) dismiss it outright are "mindless" "sheep" or whatever descriptor you want to use.

You either believe the conspiracy or are a sucker for it.

Where's my tinfoil?

[QUOTE=RaininThrees]It's kinda funny that THIS is considered "critical thinking", but those of us who have [I]actually thought about it[/I] and (rightly) dismiss it outright are "mindless" "sheep" or whatever descriptor you want to use.

You either believe the conspiracy or are a sucker for it.

Where's my tinfoil?[/QUOTE]

Whatever dumbsh*t. If you can't exercise a bit of denial and critical thinking skills, then you are just stupid wearing that tinfoil hat. Let's see the discrepancies coming out of the media:

Mother being a teacher and he shot her and students at the school.
Principle let him in the school because she knew him. Shooter shot his way in.
He shot children with a rifle but the rifle is found in car.
He shot children with hand guns but medical examiner says they were shot with rifle.
Brother was with the shooter. Brother was not with the shooter.
Brother was the shooter. Shooter had brothers ID
Mother is a gun toting lady.
Mother and son go and shoot gun a practice range often. ATF say no evidence of shooting range practice.
Mother was a teacher, mother was a substitute teacher, mother was a teacher

[QUOTE=IamRAMBO24]If you can't exercise a bit of denial and critical thinking skills, then you are just stupid wearing that tinfoil hat. Let's see the discrepancies coming out of the media[/QUOTE]

The discrepancies happen because the media are competing with each other to put the story out first. It is a lack of investigative journalism, and too much headline grabbing.

[QUOTE=miller-time]The discrepancies happen because the media are competing with each other to put the story out first. It is a lack of investigative journalism, and too much headline grabbing.[/QUOTE]

Again, your lack of knowledge is simply astounding. You don't know anything about reporting: reporters can only relay what is being told to them by the FBI, Police, and other agencies that decides to release the information.

There seems to be a deliberate attempt of misinformation. The idea is if you bombard the public with contradictory information after another, it will be harder to pin point what is factual since there are so many inconsistencies.

For example, one of the reports reported on a 2nd gunman, but since all reports are now being viewed as "rushed journalism," the initial report, whether factual or not, will now be discounted because of all the misreporting.

Usually incidents this major only has one report and most major news station would cite the official story from other news organization. So the style of reporting itself is another anamoly and something worth looking into a bit deeper.

But you are too dense, your brain might end up frying itself.

[QUOTE=IamRAMBO24]Again, your lack of knowledge is simply astounding. You don't know anything about reporting: reporters can only relay what is being told to them by the FBI, Police, and other agencies that decides to release the information.

There seems to be a deliberate attempt of misinformation. The idea is if you bombard the public with contradictory information after another, it will be harder to pin point what is factual since there are so many inconsistencies.

For example, one of the reports reported on a 2nd gunman, but since all reports are now being viewed as "rushed journalism," the initial report, whether factual or not, will now be discounted because of all the misreporting.

Usually incidents this major only has one report and most major news station would cite the official story from other news organization. So the style of reporting itself is another anamoly and something worth looking into a bit deeper.

But you are too dense, your brain might end up frying itself.[/QUOTE]


Stopped reading in the first paragraph when it became obvious dude is a quack....lol, stfu sparky and calm down while you're at it.

[QUOTE=jaydacris]What Does It All Mean[/QUOTE]
Just the killer ****ing with people in an attempt to bring even more attention to the mass murder.

Either that or it's all just a coincidence; nothing to see here.

[URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0cV65-Hjnc"][IMG]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0cV65-Hjnc[/IMG][/URL]

So this teacher was reading to the kids during the shooting. This is so stupid. Why the f*ck would you read a book, y'know make any noise, when there was a gunmen that could possibly go into your classroom and kill everybody in there .. dude if I hear gun shots, I'm curling up in a corner being as quiet as possible. Why the hell would I want to make any noise (especially reading to 20 or more kids in a loud tone) and alert him towards my way.

Child actors:

[URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEUol3q1gb8"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEUol3q1gb8[/URL]

These kids are repeating what they have been told to repeat. You can notice the lack of emotion and how they would pause up to remember a line. If a situation is dramatic, usually the victims would tear up just talking about it, and if they deal with the situation in a different way, you can see the emotions in their eyes regardless.

The eyes tell the story.

Here is another fake stupid girl trying to act like she was there:

[URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqTWxYRUuPw"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqTWxYRUuPw[/URL]

So fake.

[QUOTE=DonD13]The illuminati created a hurricane??
But they probably had to make other as well to make sure they get the letter 'S'

Timing hurricanes with movie release dates and with massacres while anonymously writing weird movie revies requires not only an ingenious sense of humor but major project managing skills as well :bowdown: :bowdown: :bowdown:

I'd join. pm me.[/QUOTE]

The government has a technology to control the weather: HARP.

[QUOTE=IamRAMBO24].[/QUOTE]

You gotta be trolling right?

This is what real emotions look like:

[URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Kz8mvoPjLA"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Kz8mvoPjLA[/URL]

Here is another video of a girl who looks perfectly calm but you can tell in her eyes she went through some trauma. Read the eyes. They tell the story:

[URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8kaoVEksAeo"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8kaoVEksAeo[/URL]

The fact those kids in the Sandy Hook shooting, who should be more susceptible to drama, shows no trauma indicates they were probably not there at the shooting to begin with. If they were, at least one of them would of shown some real emotions, not act like they are reading lines from a script.

[QUOTE=LBJMVP]yah, but aurora and sandy hook both being used in the movie?

two pretty random cities and both have mass killings in them and one was during a showing of the movie?


it could be a coincidence, but that is one hell of a coincidence.


lets not compare this to seeing a movie where someone gets shot in new york and then people actually get shot in new york... not really close to the same level of coincidence[/QUOTE]
Yeah this is hard to dismiss as coincidental.

Same girl, but this time she changes up her narrative and describes a different scenario:

[URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czT56oHZnx0"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czT56oHZnx0[/URL]

These people are so stupid; why didn't they beat the sh*t out of this girl so they could get some emotions out of her before they put her on camera? Rub some onions in here eyes or something because this girl obviously did not go through any trauma and is only making them look like fools by acting so oblivious. It looks like she just came from a Hannah Montana concert and not from a shooting where 27 people died.

600 kids and not one video of any true emotions from kids or adults. Naysayers prove to me I am a nutcase.

Give me one video, just one, of someone actually going through a traumatic ordeal. 27 people dead. [B]Someone's gotta f*ckin cry right?[/B] And no I'm not talking about the parents who weren't there on the scene and were afraid their child might've of been lost.

Strange isn't it .. the people NOT involved in the incident are the ones showing the most emotions.

[IMG]http://sphotos-h.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/65011_10200209951518279_479830515_n.jpg[/IMG]

[QUOTE=DonD13]I knew one can make clouds disappear but I wasn't aware one can make hurricanes too

[/QUOTE]

Stop acting stupid like you know every government secret there is to know out there. If you don't know everything, then stfu and start questioning. Acting like you know it and taking a position this or that cannot happen when you don't truly know it all is a false premise.

At least I'm asking questions because I am claiming I don't know anything. You gotta be honest dude.

[QUOTE=n00bie][IMG]http://sphotos-h.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/65011_10200209951518279_479830515_n.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]

Delete that. You're ruining my credibility. That is a picture of her sister, who strangely is wearing the same outfit she was in, but regardless, it's not the same girl.

[QUOTE=IamRAMBO24]Again, your lack of knowledge is simply astounding. [B]You don't know anything about reporting: reporters can only relay what is being told to them by the FBI, Police, and other agencies that decides to release the information.[/B]

There seems to be a deliberate attempt of misinformation. The idea is if you bombard the public with contradictory information after another, it will be harder to pin point what is factual since there are so many inconsistencies.

For example, one of the reports reported on a 2nd gunman, but since all reports are now being viewed as "rushed journalism," the initial report, whether factual or not, will now be discounted because of all the misreporting.

Usually incidents this major only has one report and most major news station would cite the official story from other news organization. So the style of reporting itself is another anamoly and something worth looking into a bit deeper.

But you are too dense, your brain might end up frying itself.[/QUOTE]
Lol wut? Stopped reading there too.

Haven't followed this story very closely, was there anyone who was shot but didn't die?