Jabari Parker or Andrew Wiggins?

Jabari Parker or Andrew Wiggins?

Jabari for immediate impact, Wiggins for his ceiling

Wiggins

Wiggins.

Embiid over both :rockon:

Andrew Wiggins for the long term, but Jabari Parker for short term due to adjusting to the NBA game quicker and faster. I think Wiggins has way greater upside and potential of the two that will take 2-3 years to develop.

Parker

I was one of those delusional Deron Williams fans who ignored stats and reality and thought he was better than CP3. I wont make the same mistake this time even though I like Wiggins more.

[QUOTE=Yankstar]Embiid over both :rockon:[/QUOTE]
Dat back doe..

Carmelo Anthony or Rudy Gay

[QUOTE=Nikola_]Carmelo Anthony or Rudy Gay[/QUOTE]
:applause:

[QUOTE=Nikola_]Carmelo Anthony or Rudy Gay[/QUOTE]
How is Wiggins like Rudy Gay? :facepalm

[QUOTE=JohnMax]Parker

I was one of those delusional Deron Williams fans who ignored stats and reality and thought he was better than CP3. I wont make the same mistake this time even though I like Wiggins more.[/QUOTE]
No, now you're delusional for judging players because if NCAA stats.

Andrew wiggins will be better in the NBA. I think Jabari has a better skill set at the moment but Andrew can turn into a beast. His last games been really good.

I say Parker because he is way more skilled and has a higher BB IQ. No one ever mentions in college, Parker is actually playing out of position. Wiggins uses his athleticism but does not understand the game as well.

[QUOTE=JohnFreeman]Jabari for immediate impact, Wiggins for his ceiling[/QUOTE]
Why would you want Wiggins ceiling for?:biggums:

Are you a bum?

Jabari Parker, he's versatile and really smart. He also has "IT"

[QUOTE=LilEddyCurry]How is Wiggins like Rudy Gay? :facepalm[/QUOTE]

Low bball IQ, athleticism and 'potential' vastly outstretches production.

[QUOTE=hawksdogsbraves]Low bball IQ, athleticism and 'potential' vastly outstretches production.[/QUOTE]
Please explain how Wiggins has low BBall IQ.

Give me Parker. He's got that ideal mix of size/athleticism, skills, and most importantly mentality. Bringing in a guy like him brings with it an infectious expectation of excellence. I actually think we can turn a locker room around. He carries himself like a 10 year veteran, which is very impressive. There is a higher probability of him being highly successful.

Is Wiggins the type of player willing to be off ball? Cuts, running off screens etc?

I watched him, and he seems limited to me, bu he's a real interesting prospect if he's dedicated to refining his game to suit his physical talents. i want off ball to be a big part of his game If i draft him.

Parker has all those things, and more, but he's obviously going to hit a Paul Pierce type ceiling.

Wiggins and it isn't even close in my eyes. We'll just have to wait and see though

[QUOTE=Rubio2Gasol]Is Wiggins the type of player willing to be off ball? Cuts, running off screens etc?

I watched him, and he seems limited to me, bu he's a real interesting prospect if he's dedicated to refining his game to suit his physical talents. i want off ball to be a big part of his game If i draft him.

Parker has all those things, and more, but he's obviously going to hit a Paul Pierce type ceiling.[/QUOTE]

Wiggins has been very good off the ball this year. He has shown really good instincts and knows how to read angles well on his cuts.