911 Controlled Demolition Thread

[video=youtube_share;wFJXPE0TWkM]https://youtu.be/wFJXPE0TWkM?list=PLZdhTWJ6YawrxhUFVYNw5U0ZTPyWUnyZ Y[/video]

Points from the video:

[B]The Dust[/B]
There are billions of molten iron microspheres throughout the WTC dust. ([B]Why would that be the case?[/B]) The presence of these spheres is a signature component of the dust, and they are a byproduct of a thermite reaction.

Unignited Nanothermite, a high tech explosive.

Red gray chips contained the exact ingredients of thermite (aluminum and iron oxide) at the nano scale. When ignited in a lab, the chips produced the exact same molten iron microspheres found in the WTC dust.
[B]
The Collapse[/B]
Steel members that appeared to have been partly evaporated (requires 4,000 F+).

The collapse begins abruptly, without any initial warning or structural deformation.

The building fell perfectly straight down, symmetrically, and into its own footprint, which requires simultaneous removal of all core columns. (There were many, many explosions heard after the planes hit and before the collapse, these were destroying core columns.) A fire cannot accomplish that. The building collapsed at the speed of a bowling ball falling from the sky for over a third of its descent. This means that its 40,000 tons of structural steel provided zero resistance, which is physically impossible in a fire induced collapse.

The upper section of the towers did not act as a "pile driver." It was completely destroyed and "telescoped" in on itself within the first few seconds of the collapse, leaving nothing to crush the floors below.

Two thirds of the buildings' mass (the structural steel and the concrete) was ejected outwards or pulverized in mid air and therefore was not available to do the work of crushing the structure below.

Both collapses began suddenly and proceeded in a uniform downward motion. Despite asymmetrical plane impacts and fires, both towers collapsed with complete symmetry.

Massive, multi-ton steel sections were hurled laterally up to 600 feet in every direction, landing in surrounding buildings. These sections were trailed by thick white smoke clouds, which is evidence of thermite reactions.

The 90,000 tons of concrete in each tower were pulverized into a fine powder in midair, not crushed on the ground. And it's explained by the extreme heat of nanothermite.

[IMG]https://images2.imgbox.com/cb/ae/7JHlKtL4_o.jpg[/IMG]
Heavy objects exploding outward, as the concrete turns into dust. That's just not normal.

Bill Gates about to come in with some super low iq attempt to debunk

[IMG]https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-BCr-rUqkZAA/U6lSG54xWyI/AAAAAAAAANw/dDhzhRPEvPw/s1600/Inyustisia.gif[/IMG]

The steel was burning for hours. Hours.

[QUOTE=Patrick Chewing;15032109]The steel was burning for hours. Hours.[/QUOTE]

could you see it from where you were? i'm sure you could at least see all of the smoke.

[QUOTE=diamenz;15032122]could you see it from where you were? i'm sure you could at least see all of the smoke.[/QUOTE]



You could see it for miles. I wasn't working downtown yet, so I was lucky enough to be nowhere in that area. I was up all night with my online courses that I decided to just not go to sleep that night and stay awake and I saw everything unfold as it was happening.

whenever NYC gets discussed regarding 9/11.... and controlled demolition talk....

I quickly point out that the Pentagon is even more suspicious. The Pentagon aka The Department of WAR.



Sorry guys.... The Pentagon was not hit with a Boeing. That's my stance.




what we saw on 9/11 defied the laws of physics... multiple times.

but you're crazy if you don't believe the official story.





Even more suspicious... or should I say comical.... when they got Osama Bin Laden.... they disposed his body in the ocean. How convenient is that?


And then we have Hollywood pounding the narrative to the masses as a TRUE STORY.

They "found" the hijackers passport after the plane hit and the building collapsed.

:lol:facepalm

[video=youtube;0stGWpD6_j0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0stGWpD6_j0&themeRefresh=1[/video]

[QUOTE=1987_Lakers;15032193]They "found" the hijackers passport after the plane hit and the building collapsed.

:lol:facepalm[/QUOTE]

^This guy thinks the moon is a spaceship. :roll: :roll:

[QUOTE=Full Court;15032196]^This guy thinks the moon is a spaceship. :roll: :roll:[/QUOTE]

^This guy was voted dumbest poster in ISH history. :roll:

The biggest flaw with 9/11 being an inside job will always be the fact there would have been literally zero reason for them to have used any planes beyond the original 2 if their goal was to use these events as a justification to invade the Middle East. Knocking down the WTC, which killed the vast majority of people on 9/11 anyway, would've been more than sufficient to accomplish these goals. Having two extra planes that only killed like 200 additional people and weren't even captured on film wouldn't have been worth the extra complications of doubling the operation or risking exposure.

That's the biggest one, the fact that not a single person would've been compelled to blow the whistle on such a colossal event for fame, money, or a guilty conscience is another. Or the fact they invaded Iraq on the pretense of having WMD's then claiming they didn't have any makes absolutely zero sense.

[QUOTE=Doomsday Dallas;15032169]whenever NYC gets discussed regarding 9/11.... and controlled demolition talk....

I quickly point out that the Pentagon is even more suspicious. The Pentagon aka The Department of WAR.



Sorry guys.... The Pentagon was not hit with a Boeing. That's my stance.




what we saw on 9/11 defied the laws of physics... multiple times.

but you're crazy if you don't believe the official story.





Even more suspicious... or should I say comical.... when they got Osama Bin Laden.... they disposed his body in the ocean. How convenient is that?


And then we have Hollywood pounding the narrative to the masses as a TRUE STORY.[/QUOTE]

The flight path of the pentagon flight is ridiculous.

[QUOTE] After descending from 35,000 feet, it made a wide, 330-degree spiral, clockwise turn. The plane then descended towards the Pentagon, striking its western flank at a ~42-degree angle at 9:37:46 AM[/QUOTE]

There are lots of very odd things about that day but the hijackers being able to execute this move at that altitudes and speed and accuracy seems so far fetched given the reports about the suicide pilots skill level.

[QUOTE=SouBeachTalents;15032212]The biggest flaw with 9/11 being an inside job will always be the fact there would have been literally zero reason for them to have used any planes beyond the original 2 if their goal was to use these events as a justification to invade the Middle East. Knocking down the WTC, which killed the vast majority of people on 9/11 anyway, would've been more than sufficient to accomplish these goals. Having two extra planes that only killed like 200 additional people and weren't even captured on film wouldn't have been worth the extra complications of doubling the operation or risking exposure.

That's the biggest one, the fact that not a single person would've been compelled to blow the whistle on such a colossal event for fame, money, or a guilty conscience is another. [B]Or the fact they invaded Iraq on the pretense of having WMD's then claiming they didn't have any makes absolutely zero sense.[/B][/QUOTE]

9/11 worked because at that point most people didn’t even care there were no WMD’s. They got whipped up in a frenzy like designed.

Going by your logic, if the Pentagon attack was totally unnecessary if you were taking down the towers…Why would Al Queda try to do it if we are going by the official story?

As for whistle blowers? Compartmentalization mixed with 2 choices, take the money and be quiet or try to stir things up and potentially lose everything including you and your family’s safety.

Meanwhile everyone in the conspiracy theory space only cares about Epstein, JFK, the Clinton’s, immigrants, and pedo’s.

The 911 truth movement literally died with Trump.

I like how two planes with numerous lives onboard just didn’t hit a building.

Also like how the towers which were massive in size (I know most of you never been to the WTC) came down as a result of controlled demolition.

Oh yeah and the pentagon was hit by a missle or something yea.

Funny part is you’ll take all this nonsense with you to your grave. And have zero expertise on any of this. Your conspiracy tingle inside went off and that’s all you need. lol

I was never big into the 9/11 conspiracy stuff, as in I never gave it a thorough investigation. When we were younger we watched "Loose Change" but that was the extent of it. I'm totally open to the entire thing being a conspiracy I suppose, now that I know the depths our politicians are willing to sink to.

Plus there's just no explanation for Building 7.

[QUOTE=Baller234;15032234]I was never big into the 9/11 conspiracy stuff, as in I never gave it a thorough investigation. When we were younger we watched "Loose Change" but that was the extent of it. I'm totally open to the entire thing being a conspiracy I suppose, now that I know the depths our politicians are willing to sink to.

Plus there's just no explanation for Building 7.[/QUOTE]

What are you babbling about? There is an explanation for Building 7. Whatever wacky theory you have has been debunked.

The American, Saudi, and Israeli intelligence network is who and what pulled of 911.

Pretty obvious.

[QUOTE=Patrick Chewing;15032109]The steel was burning for hours. Hours.[/QUOTE]

Nong rips to the 1st responders.

I'm not going to leftists go tio.

I KNOW FAMILY MEMBERS THAT DIED. I'm done.

The logistics of what happened on that day in terms of the towers collapsing has never interested me. The Bin Ladens immediately being flown out, the Israeli spies and the fact that the highjackers were all Saudis and all of this was largely ignored is what interests me. People get too caught up on the how and they ignore the why, which is really the most important question.

If you have zero skepticism of the government's official story from that day given everything that has come out over the years, well, I'm not sure what to say. I guess you can just go back to thinking the government would never lie to you and they have your best interest at heart. They don't ever do any coverups or nor do they obfuscate the facts surrounding events ever.

The only conspiracy is that we knew it was going to happen. We knew planes were going to be hijacked, but I'm guessing everyone underestimated the damage and extreme loss of life by having both towers fall.

But this whole incendiary devices and implosion Jewish conspiracy nonsense is just that, nonsense.

It was 100% an inside job. They never found WMDs either. All oil money. Petro dollar. USD. You'd have to be a damned fool to disagree but the crazy thing is I said this DECADES ago and nobody have a single ****.

[QUOTE=Yes or No;15032256]The logistics of what happened on that day in terms of the towers collapsing has never interested me. The Bin Ladens immediately being flown out, the Israeli spies and the fact that the highjackers were all Saudis and all of this was largely ignored is what interests me. People get too caught up on the how and they ignore the why, which is really the most important question.

If you have zero skepticism of the government's official story from that day given everything that has come out over the years, well, I'm not sure what to say. I guess you can just go back to thinking the government would never lie to you and they have your best interest at heart. They don't ever do any coverups or nor do they obfuscate the facts surrounding events ever.[/QUOTE]

I agree anyone who has zero skepticism generally speaking of the govt being truthful, honest etc are bigger idiots than the WTC conspiracy theorists. When it comes to the why as you asked? That is far more interesting. Tracing the pilots back to their origin. Making connections to this person and that. I’ll hear a person out in that regard. But not some controlled demo jackass.

[QUOTE=GOBB;15032270]But not some controlled demo jackass.[/QUOTE]


It cannot do a complete free fall at the speed of gravity, no resistance, and pretty much turn into a pile of dust with traces of nano thermite in the debris.

controlled demo jackasses didn't just wake up one morning and decide to make up some ridiculous theory.... yes, we're fully aware it sounds crazy.... but laws of physics were broken that day... 4 times.



the damage at the Pentagon is not consistent with a Boeing slamming into the side (not to mention the ridiculous flight pattern professional pilots cannot pull off)... the hole in the ground with flight 93 is not consistent with a plane crash either.

and if you think government military masterminds are not capable of such atrocities.... go read Operation Northwoods.

[QUOTE=1987_Lakers;15032199]^This guy was voted dumbest poster in ISH history. :roll:[/QUOTE]

^Still thinks the moon is a spaceship. :roll: His "intellect" speaks for itself.

[QUOTE=Full Court;15032321]^Still thinks the moon is a spaceship. :roll: His "intellect" speaks for itself.[/QUOTE]


Actually.... there are some things about the moon that cannot be explained without saying to yourself: WTF?

This show aired months before 9/11 btw. Predictive Programming.

Creepiest part for me is if you pause at 2:30 mark, you see Boston. Both planes that hit the world trade center on 9/11 departed from Boston.

[video=youtube;IIdhoc0PRr8]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IIdhoc0PRr8[/video]

[QUOTE=Doomsday Dallas;15032304]It cannot do a complete free fall at the speed of gravity, no resistance, and pretty much turn into a pile of dust with traces of nano thermite in the debris.

controlled demo jackasses didn't just wake up one morning and decide to make up some ridiculous theory.... yes, we're fully aware it sounds crazy.... but laws of physics were broken that day... 4 times.



the damage at the Pentagon is not consistent with a Boeing slamming into the side (not to mention the ridiculous flight pattern professional pilots cannot pull off)... the hole in the ground with flight 93 is not consistent with a plane crash either.

and if you think government military masterminds are not capable of such atrocities.... go read Operation Northwoods.[/QUOTE]

Where are the people involved with this controlled demolition. From the people who rigged two massive towers to the person detonating the buildings. Where is the trail of materials that were purchased/supplied/shipped? Don’t tell me controlled demolition then leave out the exact process behind a controlled demolition. I guess they all died in the towers as well huh? Hello McFly hello!

Forget you trying to break down how the towers fell. Let’s talk to about the beforehand planning, purchasing, rigging of the two towers? Where’s your conspiracy theory nonsense at now. Not one whistleblower all these years. Amazing. What a remarkable feat.

[QUOTE=warriorfan;15032225]9/11 worked because at that point most people didn’t even care there were no WMD’s. They got whipped up in a frenzy like designed.

Going by your logic, if the Pentagon attack was totally unnecessary if you were taking down the towers…Why would Al Queda try to do it if we are going by the official story?

As for whistle blowers? Compartmentalization mixed with 2 choices, take the money and be quiet or try to stir things up and potentially lose everything including you and your family’s safety.[/QUOTE]
Al Qaeda's motives were to strike symbols of the US's economy, military and political system, so from their perspective it would've made perfect sense for them to strike the Pentagon (and the Capitol as intended) even if the fatalities would be a fraction of what they were at the towers.

Another aspect I forgot to mention is, if they intended to use these attacks to invade Iraq, why would they pin this on Bin Laden & Al Qaeda? Why would they have the vast majority of these hijackers come out of Saudi Arabia instead of Iraq? Why wouldn't they implicate Saddam or Iraqi involvement at all in the planning or execution of the attack. Clearing Iraq entirely of being the perpetrators or conspirators behind it when they wanted to use it to invade their country doesn't make any sense.

[QUOTE=SouBeachTalents;15032346]Al Qaeda's motives were to strike symbols of the US's economy, military and political system, so from their perspective it would've made perfect sense for them to strike the Pentagon (and the Capitol as intended) even if the fatalities would be a fraction of what they were at the towers.

Another aspect I forgot to mention is, if they intended to use these attacks to invade Iraq, why would they pin this on Bin Laden & Al Qaeda? Why would they have the vast majority of these hijackers come out of Saudi Arabia instead of Iraq? Why wouldn't they implicate Saddam or Iraqi involvement at all in the planning or execution of the attack. Clearing Iraq entirely of being the perpetrators or conspirators behind it when they wanted to use it to invade their country doesn't make any sense.[/QUOTE]

Most of America couldn’t tell the difference between those countries and could care less.

They got programmed that Muslims did 9/11. Any Muslim country would do. The sentiment at the time was much more anti muslim and arab rather than anti a certain particular country.

[QUOTE=GOBB;15032344]Where are the people involved with this controlled demolition. From the people who rigged two massive towers to the person detonating the buildings. Where is the trail of materials that were purchased/supplied/shipped? Don’t tell me controlled demolition then leave out the exact process behind a controlled demolition. I guess they all died in the towers as well huh? Hello McFly hello!

Forget you trying to break down how the towers fell. Let’s talk to about the beforehand planning, purchasing, rigging of the two towers? Where’s your conspiracy theory nonsense at now. Not one whistleblower all these years. Amazing. What a remarkable feat.[/QUOTE]



yea.... I've thought about all of that. They're all theories. We'd sit here for hours talking about it... but obviously their would be top-secret factions within the military involved.


You want to talk about money and purchasing power?

[quote]Whatever happened to that $2.3 trillion anyway?

Many of us remembered that [b]on September 10, 2001, Donald Rumsfeld made the shocking announcement that the Pentagon "couldn't track" $2.3 trillion of its transactions.[/b] "Iroquois" observes, "What's interesting to me is that he made his press release on a Monday. In DC, I always see bad news given on a Friday, usually late in the afternoon on Friday. The exception, of course, would be when someone happens to know that there is a far bigger story coming out."

And we know that Flight 77, allegedly piloted by an incompetent, made an aerobatic, spiralling descent over Washington, effecting a 270-degree turn to strike the Pentagon from a western approach at ground level. [b]The side struck was the only one with an exterior wall hardened against attack, and was relatively empty while renovation continued.[/b]

Relatively. The unfortunate construction workers perished outside, but who were the expendables within?

From The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, December 20, 2001: "One Army office in the Pentagon lost 34 of its 65 employees in the attack. Most of those killed in the office, called Resource Services Washington, were civilian accountants, bookkeepers and budget analysts. They were at their desks when American Airlines Flight 77 struck."

The Arlington County After-Action Report noted that the "impact area included both the Navy operations center and the office complex of the National Guard and Army Reserve. It was also the end of the fiscal year and important budget information was in the damaged area." And Insight Magazine editorialized that "the Department of the Army, headed by former Enron executive Thomas White, had an excuse [for not making a full accounting]. In a shocking appeal to sentiment it says it didn't publish a "stand-alone" financial statement for 2001 because of "the loss of financial-management personnel sustained during the Sept. 11 terrorist attack."[/quote]

[QUOTE=Doomsday Dallas;15032304]It cannot do a complete free fall at the speed of gravity, no resistance, and pretty much turn into a pile of dust with traces of nano thermite in the debris.

controlled demo jackasses didn't just wake up one morning and decide to make up some ridiculous theory.... yes, we're fully aware it sounds crazy.... but laws of physics were broken that day... 4 times.



the damage at the Pentagon is not consistent with a Boeing slamming into the side (not to mention the ridiculous flight pattern professional pilots cannot pull off)... the hole in the ground with flight 93 is not consistent with a plane crash either.

and if you think government military masterminds are not capable of such atrocities.... go read Operation Northwoods.[/QUOTE]
I don’t know about the buildings, but it is clear that the narrative about the Pentagon is false, and Flight 93 was most definitely shot down.

[QUOTE=GOBB;15032240]What are you babbling about? There is an explanation for Building 7. Whatever wacky theory you have has been debunked.[/QUOTE]

Really? Explain.

Tell me how a building that wasn't hit by a plane came tumbling down in similar fashion.

Not even instigating, genuinely asking.

[QUOTE=Baller234;15033252]Really? Explain.

Tell me how a building that wasn't hit by a plane came tumbling down in similar fashion.

Not even instigating, genuinely asking.[/QUOTE]

The information has only been publicly available for over 20 years. But yeah, you're the bright crayon in the box. F[I]u[/I]cking idiot.

[QUOTE=Doomsday Dallas;15032304]It cannot do a complete free fall at the speed of gravity, no resistance, and pretty much turn into a pile of dust with traces of nano thermite in the debris.

controlled demo jackasses didn't just wake up one morning and decide to make up some ridiculous theory.... yes, we're fully aware it sounds crazy.... but laws of physics were broken that day... 4 times.
[/QUOTE]

Topic aside I love when people bring up "laws of physics" when they don't even understand them on a macroscopic level just parroting some takes they find on yt vids. See: "Speed of gravity". There's no speed of gravity.

Even a controlled demolition would be under the laws of physics.

Just stopping by to see if anyone can tell me where to find the passengers, stewardess, pilots on the plane that allegedly didn’t hit the pentagon. Shot down too? Plane never existed? Those people are still alive? Figure I give u a couple days to gather some more BS.

[QUOTE=Baller234;15033252]Really? Explain.

Tell me how a building that wasn't hit by a plane came tumbling down in similar fashion.

Not even instigating, genuinely asking.[/QUOTE]

You should’ve been left on a napkin. One person being this dumb is a waste of existence

[QUOTE=GOBB;15033700]Just stopping by to see if anyone can tell me where to find the passengers, stewardess, pilots on the plane that allegedly didn’t hit the pentagon. Shot down too? Plane never existed? Those people are still alive? Figure I give u a couple days to gather some more BS.[/QUOTE]

No one is going to waste their time trying to explain stuff to a complete idiot.

No one cares what you think either.

[QUOTE=warriorfan;15033711]No one is going to waste their time trying to explain stuff to a complete idiot.

No one cares what you think either.[/QUOTE]

There’s nothing to explain d*ckhead. The people on that plane died! Kids included. It was used to hit the pentagon. Very simple. You can’t hide all those bodies including govt folks who died as a result plus a big ass plane. Go play in traffic.