[video=youtube;usP_l9vc0Q0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usP_l9vc0Q0[/video]
Printable View
[video=youtube;usP_l9vc0Q0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usP_l9vc0Q0[/video]
Mama there goes that man
@Gobb who told us Dillion Brooks is better
:roll: :roll: :roll:
I remember 1987_Ragdolled trying to tell me that Reaves wasn't all star caliber. :roll:
Full Court just keeps on winning. :confusedshrug:
[QUOTE=Full Court;15039649]I remember 1987_Ragdolled trying to tell me that Reaves wasn't all star caliber. :roll:
Full Court just keeps on winning. :confusedshrug:[/QUOTE]
What season was he all star caliber?
[QUOTE=warriorfan;15039645]@Gobb who told us Dillion Brooks is better
:roll: :roll: :roll:[/QUOTE]
Better defender. There are 2 sides of the ball. Reaves is targeted on that side
This team is stacked. No excuses.
[QUOTE=ArbitraryWater;15039651]What season was he all star caliber?[/QUOTE]
fulltard said he was all-star caliber while averaging 13 PPG in 2023, along with Westbrick. :roll:
I always knew he had the potential to develop into the player his is now.
[QUOTE=Xiao Yao You;15039653]Better defender. There are 2 sides of the ball. Reaves is targeted on that side[/QUOTE]
It's not like Brooks is a top tier impactful defender like Wemby or Gobert, he regressed last season as a defender and is already 30. His best defensive years are behind him
He is a baller, but let's not fool ourselves. He has yet to show up in the playoffs where the lights are brighter. And he played against the Kings. Nobody on this team actually is capable of playing some sort of decent defense lol
[QUOTE=k0kakw0rld;15039664]He is a baller, but let's not fool ourselves. He has yet to show up in the playoffs where the lights are brighter. And he played against the Kings. Nobody on this team actually is capable of playing some sort of decent defense lol[/QUOTE]
What are you even talking about, he balled out in his first ever playoff game and averaged 21/5 on 69%TS in the WCF. He didn't play well against the Wolves last year but outside that, he's been fine in the playoffs.
Just box score watching but how did he attempt 22 free throws? He single-handedly took more free throws than the entire Kings' roster. Again, I did not watch the game. So, I'm not making any accusations. I'm just curious.
[QUOTE=warriorfan;15039645]@Gobb who told us Dillion Brooks is better
:roll: :roll: :roll:[/QUOTE]
The self admitted roid loser making up stuff again.
[QUOTE=1987_Lakers;15039658]It's not like Brooks is a top tier impactful defender like Wemby or Gobert, he regressed last season as a defender and is already 30. His best defensive years are behind him[/QUOTE]
He does defend though. Reeves doesnt
As I said last year, Lakers need to trade Reaves or Lebron to get a legit big man and some athletic, two-way wings.
Luka, Reaves, and 40 year old Lebron is very redundant.
[QUOTE=GOBB;15039681]The self admitted roid loser making up stuff again.[/QUOTE]
What’s your obsession with steroids lol.
You are weird.
[QUOTE=warriorfan;15039702]What’s your obsession with steroids lol.
You are weird.[/QUOTE]
its cause youre a meathead man!!!!
[QUOTE=ArbitraryWater;15039716]its cause youre a meathead man!!!![/QUOTE]
:lol
Weird.
[QUOTE=warriorfan;15039702]What’s your obsession with steroids lol.
You are weird.[/QUOTE]
Weird coming from you? That goes around posting repetitive one liners? Hilarious.
Show me where I said what you claimed meathead.
[QUOTE=GOBB;15039722]Weird coming from you? That goes around posting repetitive one liners? Hilarious.
Show me where I said what you claimed meathead.[/QUOTE]
What the **** is even this post. You are such a low iq you are like an ape or child. I literally can’t even communicate with you :roll:
[QUOTE=warriorfan;15039724]What the **** is even this post. You are such a low iq you are like an ape or child. I literally can’t even communicate with you :roll:[/QUOTE]
Self admitted roid user can’t comprehend what’s being asked. What’s being asked is show me where I said what you claimed. That Dillon brooks is better than Austin Reaves. Did you miss a cycle?
Warriormeathead “hahaha you’re a white boy I’d strangle.”
Ok. Now answer what you were asked about what you initially posted in this thread
Warriorsmeathead “rofl omg you’re so stupid.”
And he says he can’t communicate with me. lol
[QUOTE=GOBB;15039731]Self admitted roid user can’t comprehend what’s being asked. What’s being asked is show me where I said what you claimed. That Dillon brooks is better than Austin Reaves. Did you miss a cycle?
Warriormeathead “hahaha you’re a white boy I’d strangle.”
Ok. Now answer what you were asked about what you initially posted in this thread
Warriorsmeathead “rofl omg you’re so stupid.”
And he says he can’t communicate with me. lol[/QUOTE]
You are a legit animal I can’t communicate with you through text. Maybe voice or hand signals.
[QUOTE=Xiao Yao You;15039653]Better defender. There are 2 sides of the ball. Reaves is targeted on that side[/QUOTE]
Even with defense accounted for there's no way AR isn't a bigger +/- than Dillon Brooks. Who has not only gotten smoked multiple times for running his mouth, but shot poorly on top of it offensively.
Brooks shot better from 3 last season than reeves
[QUOTE=Xiao Yao You;15039786]Brooks shot better from 3 last season than reeves[/QUOTE]
Oh you mean percentage wise?
So I guess you have Steph Curry as the 14th best 3 point shooter ever?
He said brooks shot poorly. 38 % vs 40%. Reeves shot 1 more a game
[QUOTE=Xiao Yao You;15039788]He said brooks shot poorly. 38 % vs 40%. Reeves shot 1 more a game[/QUOTE]
I think he was referring to the times Brooks ran his mouth asking for LeSmoke. He did shoot poorly on occasions where he had to back up his bullshit.
[QUOTE=ArbitraryWater;15039651]What season was he all star caliber?[/QUOTE]
The last two. Any time Lebron load managed, Reaves showed that he was an all star level first option. If I were him, I'd be demanding a trade. Luka and Lebron are holding him back, and all the Lebron fans push this narrative that he's trash. He was also the go-to guy in the clutch. Any time Lebron had the ball and the game was on the line, he shriveled. If it went to Reaves, he'd hit the game winner.
[QUOTE=1987_Lakers;15039657]fulltard said he was all-star caliber while averaging 13 PPG in 2023, along with Westbrick. :roll:
I always knew he had the potential to develop into the player his is now.[/QUOTE]
No you didn't. You were one of the ones saying Lebron needed help and Reaves was garbage.
As usual, Full Court showed that he understands the game a lot better than you.
1987_Ragdolled. :lol
[QUOTE=Full Court;15039808]No you didn't. You were one of the ones saying Lebron needed help and Reaves was garbage.
As usual, Full Court showed that he understands the game a lot better than you.
1987_Ragdolled. :lol[/QUOTE]
Lying won't get you out of this. I even said his contract was a steal when he got re-signed.
You on the other hand thought Reaves and Westbrick were all-star caliber in 2023.
Fulltard :lol
[QUOTE=1987_Lakers;15039811]Lying won't get you out of this. I even said his contract was a steal when he got re-signed.
You on the other hand thought Reaves and Westbrick were all-star caliber in 2023.
Fulltard :lol[/QUOTE]
DAMAGE CONTROL.
You can try to rewrite history, but you disparaged him that season. And anyone who understood the game knew that he was all star caliber. LeNetNegative was holding him back. Of course you were far to blinded by your love for another man to consider that.
Then again, you do have a reputation on here for being a basketball ignoramus. :confusedshrug:
"2020 Heat were better than the 2025 Pacers!!!!" :roll:
[QUOTE=Full Court;15039815]"2020 Heat were better than the 2025 Pacers!!!!" :roll:[/QUOTE]
And I don't know why you keep bringing this up. Pacers lost in the Finals, just like Miami. It's not some burn like you think it is.
It's honestly embarrassing if that's the only thing you got on me. :oldlol:
You on the other hand thought OKC had a 3-1 lead in the Finals.
[QUOTE=1987_Lakers;15039817]And I don't know why you keep bringing this up. Pacers lost in the Finals, just like Miami. It's not some burn like you think it is.
[B]It's honestly embarrassing if that's the only thing you got on me. [/B]:oldlol:
You on the other hand thought OKC had a 3-1 lead in the Finals.[/QUOTE]
You also don't know what an advanced stat is.
And you think Lebron is #1 all time.
And you think Tom Brady is the biggest choker in NBA history.
Just for starters.
"Bu-bu-bu-bu-but he made a typo once!!! :cry:"
:lol Serious question: don't you ever get tired of losing? Or does losing so much help you identify more with your hero Lebron?
:lebronamazed:
[QUOTE=Full Court;15039822]You also don't know what an advanced stat is.[/QUOTE]
No need to clown yourself like that.
Guess lauri better than brooks too?
[QUOTE=1987_Lakers;15039823]No need to clown yourself like that.[/QUOTE]
Guess I hit a sore spot. :lol
And here's a couple more for you:
Dudley doesn't think Stockton was a great passer.
Doesn't think Maravich was a great passer.
[img]https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia1.tenor.com%2Fm%2FH8akeoCjEZsAAAAC%2Fincredulous-cormier.gif&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=ec77f7fa7e136f5a734af12b592dd5aeac6dd64af5a58fecb385035c99af70ccp[/img]
Thanks for reminding me that you think Maravich was a better passer than Jokic.
[QUOTE=Full Court;15039822]You also don't know what an advanced stat is.
And you think Lebron is #1 all time.
And you think Tom Brady is the biggest choker in NBA history.
Just for starters.
"Bu-bu-bu-bu-but he made a typo once!!! :cry:"
:lol Serious question: don't you ever get tired of losing? Or does losing so much help you identify more with your hero Lebron?
:lebronamazed:[/QUOTE]
sill not what a typo is
[QUOTE=ArbitraryWater;15039900]sill not what a typo is[/QUOTE]
Bronie fluffers stuggle with basic knowledge - the kind that you take it for granted that every literate person knows.
Good thing Full Court is here to educate these dummies. :lol
Here's the dictionary definition of "typo": an error (as of spelling) in typed or typeset material
[url]https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/typo[/url]
When you hit the number "1" instead of the number "2", it is, in fact, the very definition of the word "typo."
Seriously doubt you or 1987_Ragdolled ever passed high school.
[QUOTE=ArbitraryWater;15039900]sill not what a typo is[/QUOTE]
Destroyed.