Who do you think won the MVP over other who deserved it more?
For me, it has to be Nash over Kobe in '06.
Discuss.
Printable View
Who do you think won the MVP over other who deserved it more?
For me, it has to be Nash over Kobe in '06.
Discuss.
Russell over chamberlain in 1962, when wilt scores 50.4 ppg and 100 in one game.
[QUOTE=Iceman#44]Russell over chamberlain in 1962, when wilt scores 50.4 ppg and 100 in one game.[/QUOTE]
Interesting, that was a players vote too. I wonder what the final vote count was?
AI over Shaq
Rose well Rose just shouldn't have won.
Anyone who beat Micheal in his prime.
[QUOTE=gts]Interesting, that was a players vote too. I wonder what the final vote count was?[/QUOTE]
[url]http://www.basketball-reference.com/awards/awards_1962.html[/url]
Damn! It wasn't even close!
Rose in '11.
06 nash, 10 Lebron, 12 Lebron, 13 Lebron
Steve Nash won the 2005 MVP averaging 15/11.
A complete disgrace. :facepalm
Shaq and Kobe will have the same amount of MVPs as Derrick Rose when it's all said and done and Nash will have the same amount as two of the top 10 players of all time combined.:roll:
[QUOTE=PJR]Steve Nash won the 2005 MVP averaging 15/11.
A complete disgrace. :facepalm[/QUOTE]
He also made everyone on the team 10x more productive.
Derrick Rose and it isn't even close.
[QUOTE=Fresh Kid]06 nash, 10 Lebron, 12 Lebron, 13 Lebron[/QUOTE]
As a LeBron supporter who thinks Kobe should have won in 2009... I don't see how you could argue anyone over LeBron in 2013. I mean, in 2012 maybe you could say Durant because he won more games, but Bron should have won.
But in 2013? He was the most worthy. Tell me why you don't think so Wilds, i'd like to hear your argument.
[QUOTE=gts]Interesting, that was a players vote too. I wonder what the final vote count was?[/QUOTE]
What's wild is that players rarely ever had a chance to see other players games and basically voted on how a player played against them and then the box scores. So they basically saw Wilt come in and basically destroy their team and then saw that Wilt was demolishing the others teams in the box scores. It wasn't like the league was into defense either because nobody was into playing it.
They got it all perfectly correct, a players productions dont matter if it doesnt translate to the most team success.... you must have also been there to see the true context to why those players were picked over others whe seemed to have the same wins/productions on paper...
[QUOTE=tpols]He also made everyone on the team 10x more productive.[/QUOTE]
D'Antoni COY.