My crew was good but it was dominated by 8 foot giants, 9 foot LeBrons and 3 point shooting Dwights :lol
Printable View
My crew was good but it was dominated by 8 foot giants, 9 foot LeBrons and 3 point shooting Dwights :lol
[QUOTE=CelticBaller]My crew was good but it was dominated by 8 foot giants, 9 foot LeBrons and 3 point shooting Dwights :lol[/QUOTE]
Before idiots started hacking it, Crew was ****ing dope. I think I played with a few of you guys here. I loved teaming up with dudes from here because we actually played as a team, not like those morons that went 1 on 1 every possession.
Had that Michael Jordan jumper, was unstoppable :pimp:
Can we do some stat predictions for players in 2k13 in here?
A few things that pop out:
Nash and Hill should probably be lower
Irving should be close to 85
David Lee will be lower
Markieff Morris should be in the 70 range
Durant will probably be a little bit higher
Durant is a 95.
Blake is an 87.
I'm going to edit all of the overalls anyway to make them more accurate. 2K always puts certain attributes way too high, specifically Dunk and 3 Point.
^ Do you know that or are those predictions?
[QUOTE=Maniak]^ Do you know that or are those predictions?[/QUOTE]
It was announced on a live stream. As of right now, that's what they are. But they are subject to change. What their ratings would be affected by I don't know. I don't think 2K takes into consideration international performances when determining players' overalls.
diggity.
i think 2k's ratings are really weird. shumpert randomly became like a 78 but then other times players never get updated. especially rookies and small team players.
i've seen people make other ones but they are all really outlandish.
Yeah and in 2K12 everyone's shot ratings were crazy. I remember for like the first few weeks Dirk had like 99 Shot Close and 99 Mid Range.
I usually go in and do my own ratings and tendencies adjustments. I've gotten good results when I sim a 30 team association. Very realistic stats aside from team wins because 2K thinks that teams can't win on the road and can't be bad at home.
I only download rosters to get missing players. I play on PC now though so I just use mods. It's so much better.
Warriors are so broken in this game.
In fact, I find lots of low level teams like 'Cats and Warriors do too well.
The Warriors always win like 55+ games in my My Player :oldlol:
And the Bobcats were in the ECF in my Association and My Player. No trades made or anything. The base roster.
yeah i dont understand.
actually i somewhat do.
warriors are good because of curry's shooting ability.
also, big men who have a midrange J always do extremely well. in 12 min quarters jamison will average around 20ppg in an assoc with the cavs. tyrus thomas gets ppg around that as well. i don't know why it works like this.2k needs to fix this. thomas somewhat explains the bobcat's success.
It's because of 2K's horrible player tendencies. Guys' tendencies are so off. It's why you get crazy stats when you sim and play. And 2K's sim engine is programmed to think that even the best of teams cannot win on the road and even the worst of teams can be respectable at home. Just sim an association and see that only like 6-7 teams will have 50+ wins, and it's because they'll be < = .500 on the road.
I've never noticed that.
I think the funniest thing that happened to me in assoc was I simmed a bunch of seasons and like 5 years further into his career LeBron had never won a ring, Durant had 3 and had just come off of back 2 back titles, and LeBron was a 20ppg scorer on the Bobcats.
Yeah they always make the Thunder or Heat win when I sim. Weird teams always make the playoffs too like the Nets. The Bulls didn't make the playoffs in the first year of my association. No injuries or anything.
oh yeah the nets do weirdly well also. on paper i guess they're pretty good in that game though.