Re: 2012/13 Observation Deck
[QUOTE=ace23]Lol, I had NM making the Final Four in all of mine.[/QUOTE]
I decided when I was making my bracket that I wasn't gonna choose any of the "sleepers" everyone was talking about. So my championship game, in what I think is my best bracket, was hesitantly miami over either Louisville or Kansas State. Then I'm riding the wave with VCU in the final four, because it seems no one is talking about them.
Then decided that NM, SLU, and some other team that people are saying are final four chances I only have going to the sweet 16 at best. I assumed since people stopped talking about VCU, Miami, and Louisville (somewhat I don't like having them in my 4 because they're the number 1 overall, but most people writing them off worked for me) and either Kansas State or Wisconsin winning that region. But in one bracket I took Butler over Miami just...because. and have them losing to VCU and them winning it all.:oldlol:
Re: 2012/13 Observation Deck
I have New Mexico to the Sweet 16. I really thought about choosing Arizona to beat them, but I didn't trust those damn Pac 12 teams (and that bit me in the ass today :oldlol: ). I was so sure the Pac 12 and MWC teams would mostly flame out by the end of this weekend. I may have had all of them out in the first two rounds...
Oh, except New Mexico obviously. Checked and that's exactly what i did.
Re: 2012/13 Observation Deck
If it makes you feel any better I fell for Belmont again.:lol
Re: 2012/13 Observation Deck
[QUOTE=InspiredLebowski]I didn't say he was LJ, I said he's LJ sized.[/QUOTE]
Which, in hindsight, is even scarier since Larry Johnson had face-up/wing skills and was an explosive athlete with an above the rim game.
Re: 2012/13 Observation Deck
Dammit.:(
Oh nice! 3 fts.
Re: 2012/13 Observation Deck
[QUOTE][B]ESPN Stats & Info @ESPNStatsInfo[/B]
VCU's 46-point win is the largest margin of victory ever in the NCAA Tournament by a team not seeded 1 or 2 since seeding began.[/QUOTE]
I know Akron had some guys with the flu and another out with a back injury, but still. Obviously they wouldn't have made Akron 46 points better. That's pretty damn impressive.
Re: 2012/13 Observation Deck
:banana: Harvard is responding every time. Love it. Rivard's 3s have been fairly well timed too. Either extending the run or responding to a New Mexico 3.
Re: 2012/13 Observation Deck
lets go nerds!!!!!!!!!!! harvard woooooooooooooooo
Re: 2012/13 Observation Deck
Re: 2012/13 Observation Deck
I guess people saying Montana would at least play Cuse close (Kornheiser) are pissed off right now.:oldlol:
Re: 2012/13 Observation Deck
im gonna pretend the nba doesnt exist for the next few days if we are getting nailbiters every night :rockon:
Re: 2012/13 Observation Deck
[QUOTE=imdaman99]im gonna pretend the nba doesnt exist for the next few days if we are getting nailbiters every night :rockon:[/QUOTE]
There weren't any intriguing NBA games on tonight, thankfully. I did see where the 76ers choked in Denver, though. Up by 5 with like 9 seconds to go, Evan Turner missed 2 FT's, and the Nuggets won 101-100. On another note, how the hell did the awful 76ers damn near win in Denver?
Re: 2012/13 Observation Deck
[QUOTE=KG215]There weren't any intriguing NBA games on tonight, thankfully. I did see where the 76ers choked in Denver, though. Up by 5 with like 9 seconds to go, Evan Turner missed 2 FT's, and the Nuggets won 101-100. On another note, how the hell did the awful 76ers damn near win in Denver?[/QUOTE]
letdown game. they got up for okc, and blew their load there. lucky for them the 6ers choked the game away
Re: 2012/13 Observation Deck
Re: 2012/13 Observation Deck
wtf man, harvard has burned all their timeouts. get the fckin ball in, you geniuses.