Printable View
[QUOTE=Deuce Bigalow]1992-93 Orlando magic
Nick Anderson - 16.8 fga
Shaquille O'Neal - 16.1 fga[/QUOTE]
not nearly big enough of a gap to exclude that season from shaqs seasons
[B]especially since shaq attempted 9 fta's per game to andersons 5 per game
which adjusts shaqs overall fga's from 16.1 to 20.6 fga's per game
andersons 16.8 to 19.3 fga's per game[/B]
:hammertime:
:roll: Kenneth Griffin embarrassing himself as usual
And lol @
"this is why career averages favor guys who are drafted to bad teams. and shouldnt be used in all time rankings."
How about ring count? Doesn't that favor guys drafted to GOOD teams? You know, you guys and your constant "5 rings" bullsh!t. The standard response to EVERYTHING
[QUOTE=kennethgriffin]not nearly big enough of a gap to exclude that season from shaqs seasons
[B]especially since shaq attempted 9 fta's per game to andersons 5 per game
which adjusts shaqs overall fga's from 16.1 to 20.6 fga's per game
andersons 16.8 to 19.3 fga's per game[/B]
:hammertime:[/QUOTE]
2000-01 Lakers
Fga/fta/fga+fta
Kobe - 22.2/8.2/30.4
Shaq - 19.2/13.1/32.3
2001-02 Lakers
Kobe - 20/7.4/27.4
Shaq - 18.3/10.7/29
Kobe became first option in 2002-03.
[QUOTE=kennethgriffin]not nearly big enough of a gap to exclude that season from shaqs seasons
[B]especially since shaq attempted 9 fta's per game to andersons 5 per game
which adjusts shaqs overall fga's from 16.1 to 20.6 fga's per game
andersons 16.8 to 19.3 fga's per game[/B]
:hammertime:[/QUOTE]
:roll:
[QUOTE=Deuce Bigalow]2000-01 Lakers
Fga/fta/fga+fta
Kobe - 22.2/8.2/30.4
Shaq - 19.2/13.1/32.3
2001-02 Lakers
Kobe - 20/7.4/27.4
Shaq - 18.3/10.7/29
Kobe became first option in 2002-03.[/QUOTE]
:roll: kenneth****** racking up L's every post in this thread, might as well delete it while it's still only the first page.
[QUOTE=Deuce Bigalow]2000-01 Lakers
Fga/fta/fga+fta
Kobe - 22.2/8.2/30.4
Shaq - 19.2/13.1/32.3
2001-02 Lakers
Kobe - 20/7.4/27.4
Shaq - 18.3/10.7/29
Kobe became first option in 2002-03.[/QUOTE]
:oldlol: no reply.
[QUOTE=Deuce Bigalow]2000-01 Lakers
Fga/fta/fga+fta
Kobe - 22.2/8.2/30.4
Shaq - 19.2/13.1/32.3
2001-02 Lakers
Kobe - 20/7.4/27.4
Shaq - 18.3/10.7/29
Kobe became first option in 2002-03.[/QUOTE]
allow me to re introduce myself my name is OH
:hammertime:
total free throw attempts is invalid since 1 free throw does not equal 1 shot
2 free throws equal 1 shot
like my equation in the shaq vs anderson total shots. i took total free throws per game and devided by 2. then added to total fga's
in 2001
kobe 8.2 divided by 2 = 4.1
22.2 + 4.1 = 26.3
shaq 13.1 divided by 2 = 6.5
19.2 + 6.5 = 25.7
---------------------------------
in 2002
kobe 7.4 divided by 2 = 3.7
20 + 3.7 = 23.7
shaq 10.7 divided by 2 = 5.3
18.3 + 5.3 = 23.6
:djparty
00'-02'
[IMG]http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4101/4920970629_7fb8758dbc.jpg[/IMG]
:bowdown:
You sound like ESPN always with a criteria. You can also say that Kobe became the man during his prime, unlike players like Lebron and Jordan that became the man while rookies.
[QUOTE=jstern]You sound like ESPN with the criteria. You can also say that Kobe became the man during his prime, unlike players like Lebron and Jordan that became the man while rookies.[/QUOTE]
what criteria?
field goal attempts per game?
field goal attempts per game + adjusted free throws?
this isnt like espns made up bs to make someone look like the #1 option
kobe was the #1 option
shaqs minor advantages in ppg were due to shooting 2 foot layups and dunks all game. higher efficiency
shaq was more efficient. but kobe was the #1 option since 2001
[QUOTE=kennethgriffin]what criteria?
field goal attempts per game?
field goal attempts per game + adjusted free throws?
this isnt like espns made up bs to make someone look like the #1 option
kobe was the #1 option
shaqs minor advantages in ppg were due to shooting 2 foot layups and dunks all game. higher efficiency
shaq was more efficient. but kobe was the #1 option since 2001[/QUOTE]
Most "real" superstars aren't complete and utter **** when coming into the league, just like your boy.
[QUOTE=RoundMoundOfReb]I said 93-94 since nick anderson shot more than shaq in his rookie year. I'm using your own logic.[/QUOTE]
not with his adjusted fga+ free throw to field goal conversion
shaq took more shots per game.. they just didnt record them
:lol
[QUOTE=kennethgriffin]#2 Wilt Chamberlain ( 30.07ppg )[/QUOTE]
That number is wrong. Going by your criteria. Wilt never lead a team in FGA after the 65-66 season. Also Jerry west only led his team in FGA in 4 seasons and his average for just those seasons is 29.9ppg
...Also if you are going to go so far out of your way to find specific things to elevate Kobe why don't you just say we should judge players based on the number of 81 point games.
Kobe is a ****ing amazing player, top 10 all time. He doesn't need this ridiculous number juggling for people to see it.
[QUOTE=funnystuff]00'-02'
[IMG]http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4101/4920970629_7fb8758dbc.jpg[/IMG]
:bowdown:[/QUOTE]
Amazing duo
Much better than those phags in miami who had to team up cause they couldn't get shit done in the east. Hands down, miami is thehome of the gayest duo ever
[QUOTE=theBIGjabroni]Amazing duo
Much better than those phags in miami who had to team up cause they couldn't get shit done in the east. Hands down, miami is thehome of the gayest duo ever[/QUOTE]
Seems like that photo sparked your emotions.
Stay salty. :cheers: