-
Re: Poor Blake Griffin
[QUOTE=G-train]Maybe because overall the roster sucks. surely you are not implying that those 3 are not goof young players.[/QUOTE]
They absolutely are goof young players, but if they were that goof, wouldn't they get more wins? How does the "overall roster" suck? You just named three quality players. :confusedshrug:
"Um...ok....we have Lebron, Howard, and CP3.........yeah, but what about the REST of the roster?!"
-
Re: Poor Blake Griffin
-
Re: Poor Blake Griffin
[QUOTE=G-train]you are pathetic[/QUOTE]
Haha, nice rebuttal.
OK, my turn.....your momma!!!!!
-
Re: Poor Blake Griffin
[QUOTE=G-train]They havent drafted Blake yet.
This is the Clippers.[/QUOTE]
[IMG]http://www.blogcdn.com/nba.fanhouse.com/media/2009/05/andyroeser-tz-150.jpg[/IMG]
Guess what number was on the other side of his jacket?:pimp:
-
Re: Poor Blake Griffin
[QUOTE=bagelred]Haha, nice rebuttal.
OK, my turn.....your momma!!!!![/QUOTE]
Your level of stupidity isn't worth responding to properly. You are a joke poster.
-
Re: Poor Blake Griffin
Anyone think that Griffin will be better then Beasley?
-
Re: Poor Blake Griffin
[QUOTE=G-train]Your level of stupidity isn't worth responding to properly. You are a joke poster.[/QUOTE]
I asked why OKC didn't win more games if they have 3 very good young players, and you couldn't answer the question. Seems the joke is on you G plane.
-
Re: Poor Blake Griffin
[QUOTE=plowking]Anyone think that Griffin will be better then Beasley?[/QUOTE]
Yeah, most def. He's not as skilled at this point, but he's (IMO) a superior athlete with better size. I think Griffin will be a legit PF while Beasily will always be somewhat of a tweener.
-
Re: Poor Blake Griffin
[QUOTE=FULL CLIP]Yeah, most def. He's not as skilled at this point, but he's (IMO) a superior athlete with better size. I think Griffin will be a legit PF while Beasily will always be somewhat of a tweener.[/QUOTE]
Superior athlete in what sense?
Beasley is able to throw down between the legs dunks, has a great first step and change of direction.
What are Griffin's strengths? Because like Beasley in the post he seems to just have used his szie, but he doesn't have the outside game like Beasley.
-
Re: Poor Blake Griffin
[QUOTE=Reverend Hoops][IMG]http://www.nba.com/media/clippers/1988-89_manning2.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
Uh oh.
:oldlol:
-
Re: Poor Blake Griffin
[img]http://lowposts.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/olowokandi.png[/img]
-
Re: Poor Blake Griffin
I honestly believe Randolph/Camby/ or Kaman will be moved.
They definately need to shed Ricky Davis, and Randolph, and with this kid coming to town, I think they'll definately be making a LOT of moves.
-
Re: Poor Blake Griffin
[QUOTE=plowking][B]Superior athlete in what sense?[/B]
Beasley is able to throw down between the legs dunks, has a great first step and change of direction.
What are Griffin's strengths? Because like Beasley in the post he seems to just have used his szie, but he doesn't have the outside game like Beasley.[/QUOTE]
Bigger body, stronger, probably just as fast (not as quick) and (IMO) more impressive leaper. I don't care about throwing down a between the legs (when is he gonna do that in a game?), Blake throws down on (and sometimes over) cats. Blake would dunk in many scenarios where Beaz would have to layup. Griffin Finishes stronger, and he played better D (in the post). Beasely is a much more finished product, but Griffin has more upside (and a better attitude).
-
Re: Poor Blake Griffin
[QUOTE=FULL CLIP][IMG]http://www.blogcdn.com/nba.fanhouse.com/media/2009/05/andyroeser-tz-150.jpg[/IMG]
Guess what number was on the other side of his jacket?:pimp:[/QUOTE]
:cheers: numba 23!!!!!!!!!
-
Re: Poor Blake Griffin
Lets not get it twisted here folks...they're going to take Blake with the first pick. No doubts about it.