Skywalker is up.
Printable View
Skywalker is up.
[QUOTE=iamgine]Kurt Angle[/QUOTE]
Curse you
How does this Pro Wrestling Nexus thing work? What are the wins based on?
Also, are teams one pick or two?
And if we pick 4 wrestlers per round, what's the point of 8 rounds? Won't you just pick your Top 4 guys, and are there really 128 WWE wrestlers who are notable enough to justify being picked?
we aren't picking 4 per round, what are you talking about? did i misspell something to make it seem like that?
i dont know how it works, tbh.
i think pretty much each wrestler has a certain amount of health and they all have certain moves and those moves do damage.
i'm assuming it's based on percentages and stuff
[QUOTE=Maniak]we aren't picking 4 per round, what are you talking about? did i misspell something to make it seem like that?
i dont know how it works, tbh.[/QUOTE]
I meant per matchup round.
Well somebody should figure it out so I know how to pick. :lol
just pick how you'd usually pick.
well i thought it'd be nice to have some variety in the wrestlers available. you need at least 6.
[QUOTE=Knicks101]I meant per matchup round.
Well somebody should figure it out so I know how to pick. :lol[/QUOTE]
As Maniak said, it sounds like it takes into account the wrestlers wins/losses, moveset, and championships. It is a simulation (similar to the show Deadliest Warrior if you have seen that). There are different scenarios that will result in a victory for each wrestler. Whichever wrestler has a higher probability of victory will be selected as the 'better' wrestler.
I have charlie sheens picks at number 8 since he might not be here to make them
This is the first i'm hearing of a simulator. I thought it was all going to be judged.
If you're really against the simulator we can just do judges. I just thought it'd be a more interesting way of doing things but I really don't care all that much.
Where's Skywalker?
Don't know. I pm'ed him.
Maniak wins undertaker = GOAT
ALso I havent kept up with this shit in so long but last i was watching undertaker was still like 16-0 at wrestlemania is his streak still rollin or did they decide to make him lose finally?
[QUOTE=Maniak]If you're really against the simulator we can just do judges. I just thought it'd be a more interesting way of doing things but I really don't care all that much.[/QUOTE]
I don't mind having both, its just the simulator wouldn't take into account things like how well rounded the wrestler is beyond how popular or how successful they were in the company. Don't want to name drop, but i would argue some wrestlers were better than others, despite the other wrestler being more popular or achieving more success.
Also, if we draft a WWF/E wrestler whose prime was in another promotion, can we still argue that wrestler's worth based on how good they were before or after the WWE?