Re: NBA.com "Melo's Recent Run Creates 'What Ifs"
[QUOTE=NumberSix]What makes this Knicks franchise any better than the Bucks or the Warriors? Seriously, what?[/QUOTE]
1. Better record
2. Better players
3. Top 5 Player on team
4. Better record
5. Better players
It's simple, really. Take your troll goggles off and maybe you'll see.
Re: NBA.com "Melo's Recent Run Creates 'What Ifs"
[QUOTE=Patrick Chewing]1. Better record
2. Better players
3. Top 5 Player on team
4. Better record
5. Better players
It's simple, really. Take your troll goggles off and maybe you'll see.[/QUOTE]
You misunderstand me sir. I'm not arguing that the Knicks aren't better than the Bucks or the Warriors this season. That's clearly true. The Knicks are obviously better than the Bucks and probably better than the Warriors.
The franchise. What makes the Knicks a better franchise? Their perennial losers. They've won a single playoff game in the last 10 years. They havent even been close to being contenders. What makes them a higher tier franchise than the Bucks or Warriors?
The fact they they are an even larger market team than the Lakers, wouldn't it make them even more of a failure than small market teams with the same lack of success?
Re: NBA.com "Melo's Recent Run Creates 'What Ifs"
[QUOTE=NumberSix]You misunderstand me sir. I'm not arguing that the Knicks aren't better than the Bucks or the Warriors this season. That's clearly true. The Knicks are obviously better than the Bucks and probably better than the Warriors.
The franchise. What makes the Knicks a better franchise? Their perennial losers. They've won a single playoff game in the last 10 years. They havent even been close to being contenders. What makes them a higher tier franchise than the Bucks or Warriors?
The fact they they are an even larger market team than the[B] Lakers,[/B] wouldn't it make them even more of a failure than small market teams with the same lack of success?[/QUOTE]
Lakers the best, best respect that bish.
Re: NBA.com "Melo's Recent Run Creates 'What Ifs"
[QUOTE=NumberSix]You misunderstand me sir. I'm not arguing that the Knicks aren't better than the Bucks or the Warriors this season. That's clearly true. The Knicks are obviously better than the Bucks and probably better than the Warriors.
The franchise. What makes the Knicks a better franchise? Their perennial losers. They've won a single playoff game in the last 10 years. They havent even been close to being contenders. What makes them a higher tier franchise than the Bucks or Warriors?
The fact they they are an even larger market team than the Lakers, wouldn't it make them even more of a failure than small market teams with the same lack of success?[/QUOTE]
The Knicks are perennial losers?? Cause prior to the 2000-2001 season, the Knicks made 14 straight post-season appearances. You can't obviously be dense enough to only be talking about the last 10 years and then mention "franchise" which goes back years and years buddy.
Your argument (which you never really had one) is completely moot, because if you want to talk about perennial losers as of late, then that includes almost every team outside of the Lakers, Spurs, Heat, and Bulls.
Re: NBA.com "Melo's Recent Run Creates 'What Ifs"
[QUOTE=Kingwillball]Yeah a guy who never lead his team anywhere in playoffs compared to a giy who has played in 3 championships and is pretty much a constant deep in playoffs all career long.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=NumberSix]They've won a single playoff game in the last 10 years.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=DealWithIt]Melo is a perennial loser.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=KyrieTheFuture]Your quest to get Melo's first accolade is so ****ing adorable[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Mr. Incredible]Melo has done nothing in his career that's worthwhile. Is that not true?
Troll harder next time bro. You're lousy at it.[/QUOTE]
What will the argument be when they win another playoff series?
Re: NBA.com "Melo's Recent Run Creates 'What Ifs"
[QUOTE=Patrick Chewing]The Knicks are perennial losers?? Cause prior to the 2000-2001 season, the Knicks made 14 straight post-season appearances. You can't obviously be dense enough to only be talking about the last 10 years and then mention "franchise" which goes back years and years buddy.
Your argument (which you never really had one) is completely moot, because if you want to talk about perennial losers as of late, then that includes almost every team outside of the Lakers, Spurs, Heat, and Bulls.[/QUOTE]
He wouldn't know what a perennial loser is. He switches bandwagons whenever a new team looks to have a chip on lock. Laker and Heat fan :roll:
Re: NBA.com "Melo's Recent Run Creates 'What Ifs"
Warriors have more titles than the Knicks and better players through their franchise history. All-time Warriors>Knicks.
Re: NBA.com "Melo's Recent Run Creates 'What Ifs"
[QUOTE=NumberSix]You misunderstand me sir. I'm not arguing that the Knicks aren't better than the Bucks or the Warriors this season. That's clearly true. The Knicks are obviously better than the Bucks and probably better than the Warriors.
[B][COLOR="Red"]The franchise.[/COLOR][/B] What makes the Knicks a better franchise? Their perennial losers. They've won a single playoff game in the last 10 years. They havent even been close to being contenders. What makes them a higher tier franchise than the Bucks or Warriors?
The fact they they are an even larger market team than the Lakers, wouldn't it make them even more of a failure than small market teams with the same lack of success?[/QUOTE]
Heat could win 10 in a row and the Knicks would still be 10x the better franchise.
Re: NBA.com "Melo's Recent Run Creates 'What Ifs"
[QUOTE=Patrick Chewing]The Knicks are perennial losers?? Cause prior to the 2000-2001 season, the Knicks made 14 straight post-season appearances. You can't obviously be dense enough to only be talking about the last 10 years and then mention "franchise" which goes back years and years buddy.
Your argument (which you never really had one) is completely moot, because if you want to talk about perennial losers as of late, then that includes almost every team outside of the Lakers, Spurs, Heat, and Bulls.[/QUOTE]
He probably started watching since 2004...
Re: NBA.com "Melo's Recent Run Creates 'What Ifs"
[QUOTE=Patrick Chewing]The Knicks are perennial losers?? Cause prior to the 2000-2001 season, the Knicks made 14 straight post-season appearances. [B] You can't obviously be dense enough to only be talking about the last 10 years and then mention "franchise" which goes back years and years buddy.
[/B]
Your argument (which you never really had one) is completely moot, because if you want to talk about perennial losers as of late, then that includes almost every team outside of the Lakers, Spurs, Heat, and Bulls.[/QUOTE]
You seriously under estimate the stupidity of numbersix. He's a Heat fan his idea of franchise "history" extends back to 3 years