Celts want Stoudemire

Well I just read that Boston is interested in a trade for Stoudemire. Knicks would get Gerald Wallace and Kris Humphreys. I would definitely do it. Humphreys can rebound and Wallace plays with passion. Two things the NYK are in desperate need of.

celtics are winning so getting amare will stop that to help with the proposed plan of tanking

amare for rondo, get it done

[QUOTE=bluechox2]celtics are winning so getting amare will stop that to help with the proposed plan of tanking

amare for rondo, get it done[/QUOTE]
[B]Rondo and Wallace/Humphries still works. I'd do either trade though.[/B]

They want to trade Wallace because he has 3 years on his deal. Meaning, if we trade Amare for him, we'll be stuck with him for 3 years. Not saying I would or wouldn't do it. I just don't think it's as big a no brainer as people are making it out to be.

[QUOTE=franchize]They want to trade Wallace because he has 3 years on his deal. Meaning, if we trade Amare for him, we'll be stuck with him for 3 years. Not saying I would or wouldn't do it. I just don't think it's as big a no brainer as people are making it out to be.[/QUOTE]
[B]3 years 10 mill or 2 years 20 plus mill... which is more manageable? [/B]

[QUOTE=Rameek][B]3 years 10 mill or 2 years 20 plus mill... which is more manageable? [/B][/QUOTE]
I guess it depends on what you're plans are going forward. If you really expect to contend now, then Gerald's is. If you a re planning for the future then Amare's is.

[QUOTE=franchize]I guess it depends on what you're plans are going forward. If you really expect to contend now, then Gerald's is. If you a re planning for the future then Amare's is.[/QUOTE]
[B]The Knicks gave away too many draft picks[/B]

[QUOTE=Rameek][B]The Knicks gave away too many draft picks[/B][/QUOTE]

The story was the same when I joined this message board a few years back. :oldlol:

I expect some drastic trade moves from the Knicks in about 2 weeks if they keep looking like this. I'm always open to getting rid of Amar'e.