Romney.
Printable View
Romney.
Obama
[QUOTE=BoutPractice]> Even if that's the case, some lobbies are more harmful than others, so there still is a choice to make.[/QUOTE]
The choice thou isnt one of distinction, but rather one of degree.
Eg. Not whether we cut entitlements, but rather how much.
Not whether we prosecute Wall Street or not, but about how much we suck up to them.
Not whether healthcare reform controls costs or not, but rather dealing with the symptom of the real problem. (cost controls vs coverage)
How much the corporate tax rate is going to be lowered.
how many countries we will violate and to what extent.
How little action we take to protect/support domestic manufacturing.
etc.
[QUOTE=midatlantic09]I wouldn't say he'll get 270 electoral votes easily, but he does have much easier path to those 270 electoral votes than Romney.[/QUOTE]
honestly if Obama loses now it would be about the equivalent of the Chargers choke job last night. It could happen, but If I could bet on it, I would bet the House on Obama.
[QUOTE=EasyD]None of the above, [B]both parties are almost completely bought and controlled by corporate lobby groups[/B]. The only thing which is different is that certain economic sectors lean more towards Republicans while other prefer Democrats. It's almost like having an election between Walmart and McDonalds :D.[/QUOTE]
Yes, but 1 party is trying to repeal that while the other is in staunch support of it. If that's your major concern, it's pretty clear cut.
they both suck. but the alternative is voting for ... Rosanne Barr? apparently she's on the presidential ticket here in California for the peace and freedom party. ugh. what great choices we have.
[QUOTE=WesWelkerACL]lol at people saying Gary Johnson and Ron Paul. Shows a severe lack of intellect, because I seriously doubt you'd support them if you really broke down their positions. Ex: No FDA, no FAA.[/QUOTE]
Because the FDA, headed by a former Monsanto lawyer appointed by Obama, is no conflict of interest nor just another ineffective government agency, right?
Go ahead and choose between your Giant Douche and Turd Sandwich. :rolleyes:
I support President Barack Obama.
:coleman:
One is weak and incompetent, the other is a ****ing mormon. NEITHER. Gary Johnson is the correct answer.
According to numerous scientific studies........
Highest I.Q. = people that don't vote
Second highest I.Q. = people that support third party and independent candidates
Third highest I.Q. = independent voters
Fourth highest I.Q. = Democrats
Lowest I.Q. = Republicans
Ron Paul '08
:bowdown:
Mittens by default... Obama has had 4 years in office and has been an abject failure, I can't take another 4 years of his incompetence.
[QUOTE=Euroleague]According to numerous scientific studies........
Highest I.Q. = people that don't vote
Second highest I.Q. = people that support third party and independent candidates
Third highest I.Q. = independent voters
Fourth highest I.Q. = Democrats
[B]Lowest I.Q. = Republicans[/B][/QUOTE]
No way in hell can this be right, Republicans ALWAYS carry the white male vote and Democrats ALWAYS carry the black vote ;) (Every legitimate study on race and IQ has had blacks come in last place). :hammerhead:
[QUOTE=Euroleague]According to numerous scientific studies........
Highest I.Q. = people that don't vote
Second highest I.Q. = people that support third party and independent candidates
Third highest I.Q. = independent voters
Fourth highest I.Q. = Democrats
Lowest I.Q. = Republicans[/QUOTE]
The stupidest thing any eligible voter can do is to not vote. You're just letting the rest of the nation make the decision for you, which may not suit your personal interests.
I am casting my vote for [IMG]http://i682.photobucket.com/albums/vv183/Psykotto/one-thousand-white-women.jpg[/IMG]