Message Board Basketball Forum - InsideHoops

Message Board Basketball Forum - InsideHoops (http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/index.php)
-   New York Knicks Forum (http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=13)
-   -   Starting Lineup (Based On Current Roster) (http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/showthread.php?t=653)

B-Low 06-07-2006 10:27 PM

Starting Lineup (Based On Current Roster)
 
So of course there's the Francis/Marbury debate, and then there's who to start at the 3, so my question is who do you think should start out of the current Knicks? In NBA Live at least here's the starters I put out

PG: Marbury
SG: Francis
SF: Richardson
PF: Frye
C: Curry

Sometimes I start Robinson in Marbury's place, so they're interchangable, and i SOMETIMES start Rose at the 3, but i like bringing him off the bench since he can play anything from the 1-3, so i just put him in if someone else is in foul trouble or struggling. How bout you guys?

thenextgreatbigman 06-07-2006 10:33 PM

I'd love to see

nate
crawford
lee
frye
curry

these guys would play hard and work off of each other. might be young and inexperienced but they would be very energetic. (especially nate and lee)

**** marbury/francis/richardson and a few more guys that i don't have time to mention

The REAL Next KNICK 06-08-2006 12:45 AM

pg- marbury
sg- crawford
sf- q rich
pf- frye
c-curry

datdude 06-08-2006 01:01 AM

actually, i would love to see Q start at the 2. If he starts posting up players and slashing like he did in LA versus jacking up 3's, he could create some serious matchup problems. I dont see stevie hanging around too much longer, trust me

1-Marbs
2-Q
3-Lee (hopefully)/woods
4-Frye
5-Curry

brooklynchild155 06-08-2006 01:52 AM

1:marbury
2:francis
3:lee
4:fyre
5:curry

The REAL Next KNICK 06-08-2006 02:03 AM

to me crawford is a starting because what he did at the end of last year, q at the 3 and lee curyr marbury

datdude 06-08-2006 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The REAL Next KNICK
to me crawford is a starting because what he did at the end of last year, q at the 3 and lee curyr marbury


exactly, because of what he did last year he should definantly stay a 6th man. he gave instance offense off the bench, chose better shot selections, and was a overall smarter player. true he played well when steph was "hurt", but i LOVED him coming off the bench. I could see him competing for 6th man OTY this year

JinTheWindMaster 06-08-2006 01:24 PM

PG-Marbury
SG-Crawford
SF-Lee
PF-Frye
C-Curry

Da KO King 06-08-2006 04:58 PM

pg- marbury
sg- francis
sf- q rich
pf- frye
c-curry

Let Crawford be the first man off the bench anchoring the second unit.

Michael_Who? 06-08-2006 07:12 PM

because of the big names, this will be the anticipated line up..

pg-Marbury
sg-Francis
sf-Richardson
pf-Frye
C-Curry

but IMO, I think it should be

pg-Marbury
sg-Quiten Richardson
sf-Jalen Rose
pf-David Lee
c-Channing Frye/Eddie Curry

Unless Frye fully recovers from that knee incident late this year, I believe he can make it to the starting line up. anyone has news on him?

Question.. if the Knicks are in a rebuilding process, why do they have two novice centers, Frye and Curry? Wouldn't it be hard to develop two unique Foward/Centers? Just wonderin..

datdude 06-09-2006 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Michael_Who?

Question.. if the Knicks are in a rebuilding process, why do they have two novice centers, Frye and Curry? Wouldn't it be hard to develop two unique Foward/Centers? Just wonderin..


actually, frye is playing pf. they are trying to develop him into a garnett/J oneil type player. we have this other fellow backing up curry at center named jerome james.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Terms of Use/Service | Privacy Policy