They lost to the Cavs.
Printable View
They lost to the Cavs.
Their name value is more impressive than the actual talent guys like KG-Perice have left.
The defending champs with 3 all stars & the reigning MVP in his prime surrounded by amazing role players should be able to handle them..
Do you think Jordan ever feared the 97 Rockets with old as Barkely, still great Hakeem and old Drexler?
This thread is ridiculous. Do they even have one top-10 player?
[QUOTE=Eric Cartman]They lost to the Cavs.[/QUOTE]
:rockon:
How the hell do we still not have avatars.
Where's the give away that was promised "at the end of this week" 2 weeks ago?
Why does this dude continually string us along without giving us any insight on to what he's doing to follow through on his promises.
Where's the new mods? We had massive thread with some great nominations.
We should all take our talents to REALGM for one day until some changes are made. This forum would be shit without us, what's ISH gonna do if we leave...
Open up registration :rolleyes:
ISH stand tall and fight for your god given right of avatars
Jeff is like the abusive boyfriend who treats us like shit just to see how much he can get away with before we break up with him
No other team is more stacked than this Heat team.
LeBron
Wade
Bosh
Allen
Battier
Beasley
Andersen
Haslem
Chalmers
Cole
Oden
WE DA BESS
Building this team up so if the Heat beat them in Playoffs you can say "Lebron beat a stacked team, I want his babies." or if they lose "Well this team was stacked so of course my Lebronny wonny couldn't beat them"
:roll:
I really like this squad and they're just as good as anybody in today's league, but they're not historically stacked or anything. Show time Lakers, 60's and 80's Celtics, early 2000's Lakers, and 90's Bulls were clearly more stacked.
[QUOTE=Heavincent]:roll:
I really like this squad and they're just as good as anybody in today's league, but they're not historically stacked or anything. Show time Lakers, 60's and 80's Celtics, early 2000's Lakers, and 90's Bulls were clearly more stacked.[/QUOTE]
I wouldn't call the early 90s bulls or the early 2000 Lakers stacked.
80s Celtcis, Showtime Lakers, 97 Bulls, Russelss Celtics are sacked IMO.
Hell throw in the 08 Celtcis too, 3 great players in te last year of their primes with a solid supporting cast
Hardly, though they may have the best 1-9 of any team right now.
D.Will
JJ
PP
KG
Lopez
---
Livingston
Terry
AK
Blatche
Taylor
A.Anderson
Toko
Evans
Teletovic
Plumlee
are decent 3rd string depth, but aren't anywhere near the level of the top 9 and are the type of third string talent most teams have, though Anderson and Evans would probably be in most team's 2nd 5.
[QUOTE=Real Men Wear Green]This thread is ridiculous. Do they even have one top-10 player?[/QUOTE]
No, neither do most teams.
8 or 9 teams have top 10 players.
I think stacked, more refers to depth though.
[QUOTE=Heavincent]and 90's Bulls were clearly more stacked.[/QUOTE]
Early 90's Bulls? You serious right now? pauk, on damage control. Nothing more. I'm not saying the Nets aren't nice, but the Heat themselves are very stacked. A lot of the Nets players have more name value than actual impact. KG, Pierce are running on fumes.
they won 1 game. stfu
if KG was a few years younger they'd be A LOT better. Maybe one of the all-time great teams. But I'm not trusting a 38 year old to be elite night after night for 35+ minutes. Without a dominant KG this team isn't that impressive.
This is embarrassing, even for you.