[QUOTE=Beatlezz]OP does. :coleman:
[url]http://insidehoops.com/forum/showthread.php?t=292754[/url][/QUOTE]
First place in fantasy :pimp:
What happened to your team?
Printable View
[QUOTE=Beatlezz]OP does. :coleman:
[url]http://insidehoops.com/forum/showthread.php?t=292754[/url][/QUOTE]
First place in fantasy :pimp:
What happened to your team?
oh yeah, Ron Mercer! :rockon:
Lebron might have to be up there. He has stats comparable to any top 5 player in history of the game but his ring count stands at only 1, not in the same stratosphere as the rest of top 10 players. shows the disparity between his statistical output and championship contribution. that's the defintion of empty stats
[QUOTE=STATUTORY]Lebron might have to be up there. He has stats comparable to any top 5 player in history of the game but his ring count stands at only 1, not in the same stratosphere as the rest of top 10 players. shows the disparity between his statistical output and championship contribution. that's the defintion of empty stats[/QUOTE]
LeBron's career isn't over, Stephen Hawking :facepalm
And he was a one-man show most of his career, didn't have a real championshi caliber team until the last few years.
[QUOTE=RRR3]LeBron's career isn't over, Stephen Hawking :facepalm
And he was a one-man show most of his career, didn't have a real championshi caliber team until the last few years.[/QUOTE]
if lebron don't win this year.. dis forum gonna be hard to read for u stans
[QUOTE=RobertdeMeijer]Adrian Dantley probably gives Win Shares a bad name like no other player.
Allan Iverson I would consider as the king of empty box-scores.[/QUOTE]
Allen Iverson=empty stats to you?:roll:
Monte Ellis
Apparently Dominique Wilkins cause he wasn't even voted Top 50 All-Time
Kevin Love (or rather Minnesota) has proven that he wasn't an empty stats player. His stats allowed Minnesota to win at least some games. Without him, they are the worst team in the league. With him, maybe 10th worst.
Amare
[QUOTE=Patrick Chewing]Apparently Dominique Wilkins cause he wasn't even voted Top 50 All-Time[/QUOTE]
I would have given him the nod over Robert Parish, Pistol Pete, Dave Bing, Dave DeBusschere, Sam Jones, Hal Greer, James Worthy, and possibly John Stockton. When that list came out, his omission was a hot topic among the fan and media.
[QUOTE=SilkkTheShocker]We all know Pistol Pete is GOAT of empty stats players. But who else?
Kevin Love
Antawn Jamison
Shareef Abdur-Rahim - Prince of Empty Stats :bowdown:
Juwan Howard
Al Jefferson
Derrick Coleman
Stephon Marbury
Who else?[/QUOTE]
Empty stats is someone like Mike James or another role player putting up numbers on bad teams.
All those guys listed were fantastic players.
[QUOTE=tmacattack33]Kevin Love (or rather Minnesota) has proven that he wasn't an empty stats player. His stats allowed Minnesota to win at least some games. Without him, they are the worst team in the league. With him, maybe 10th worst.[/QUOTE]
According to one of the analytics companies, SportsVU, Kevin Love is the hardest working man in basketball. He sprints the whole game. His stats aren't empty, he puts a lot of work into getting them.
So these should not have scored? That would have served their teams better? Fail:facepalm
[QUOTE=RRR3]LeBron's career isn't over, Stephen Hawking :facepalm
And he was a one-man show most of his career, didn't have a real championshi caliber team until the last few years.[/QUOTE]
This myth needs to stop about LeBron's squads in Cleveland. Did he have a superstar co runner? No, but he had well custom built teams with appropriate pieces that fit LeBron's game, stregnths and playing style. Winning 60+ in back to back seasons wasn't just all because of LeBron.