![]() |
OT: Colbert rips Bush during white house dinner
funny stuff. Bush looks like he is contemplating ways to have Colbert assasinated.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=OOprXKpuVRc |
he is one funny dude i love his show
|
Colbert is the man
|
re
what a brave, but idiotic jerk.
liberals should take a hint. complaining about it will only exacerbate the situation. we still do live in a democracy and once Bush leaves, and once Congress becomes more bipartisan, then all is well again. what did COlbert hope to achieve? lower BUsh's approval rating? it's already pretty low you know? |
...
satire and dissent are very important elements of a successful democracy.
|
.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=U1_9JqxeUM8
if you can sit through this without feeling weird...than props to you. if you just want some laughs, watch from 1:00 to 1:10. |
Quote:
i think im going to hell |
Quote:
wrong. debate is key to a successful democracy. the fact that Bush is even in power and causing all these problems shows that democracy is not being served. i just want to clear up my political views: i am actually a libertarian. in other words, I care about individual rights of all and myself. using a simple analogy, libertarianism is "socially liberal, economically conservative." i also think it is keeping it very real. true conservatism in America is dead because Bush has ruined it, and stupid whining liberals (who only care about yapping their traps and complaining that they do nothing to serve their country or do anything productive at all) fail to acknowledge it exists for fear that the uneducateed proletariat will think Bush (who does not advocate true conservatism) is a good guy. |
will we ever have a strong third party? we really need one.
|
...
wrong...
how i said "important" to a successful democracy. You responded mentioning debate as the "key". Which is not relevant to what i stated in my post. Many things can be of importance including debate, i did not prioritze. So if there is something wrong, it is your logical reasoning skills. |
|
re
Quote:
what a lame recovery. why do people who argue online spew utter nonsense when they know they have been beaten in an argument? is it a defense mechanism? or the fact that they know they have nothing to lose so they will say it anyway? sounds like a liberal. you say "dissent" is key to a democracy. dissent is what is causing problems in Darfur right now, one of the main issues your precious liberals care so much about. dissent is what caused the Rwanda massacre. dissent is what caused the French Revolution. dissent from spheres of influence is what gutted China from the inside out. dissent ruins nations. the original ideal of democracy in Athens is that citizens meet and peacefully discuss what is wrong in their society and how to solve it in committee. not "dissent" and strangle each other. next time you want to engage in a political debate, you may want to look up in a dictionary what certain words mean, much less actually learn about precedent. |
Just split up the country into 3 nations. The west coast above the Orange County line, the north east, and then the balance of the nation. People would be much happier.
|
re
Quote:
naive. you ever hear of economy? |
Quote:
Very large generalization there. The people dissenting would be the black muslims in Darfur who didn't want to be neglected by Sudan's government, or (even worse) be subject to Sharia Law. Do you even understand what is happening in Darfur? Quote:
It also caused the American revolution. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:14 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.