Message Board Basketball Forum - InsideHoops

Message Board Basketball Forum - InsideHoops (http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/index.php)
-   NBA Forum (http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Bulls with LaMarcus Aldridge or Thunder with Tyson Chandler? (http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/showthread.php?t=231118)

28renyoy 07-28-2011 09:07 PM

Bulls with LaMarcus Aldridge or Thunder with Tyson Chandler?
 
Which team would be better? Obviously the Bulls traded Tyrus Thomas for Aldridge & the Thunder's trade for Chandler didn't work because of a failed physical.

Rose/Watson
Bogans/Brewer
Deng/Korver
Aldridge/Gibson
Noah/Asik

Westbrook/Maynor
Harden/Sefalosha
Durant/Cook
Ibaka/Collison
Chandler/Perkins

Unstoppabull 07-28-2011 09:17 PM

Re: Bulls with LaMarcus Aldridge or Thunder with Tyson Chandler?
 
Bulls with Alridge. D-Rose gets a legit 2nd scoring option. Alridge was totally a breakout player this year, getting snubbed really elevated his level of play.

OKC with Chandler is no different than OKC with Perkins.

Both teams still have flaws though, OKC needs to smarten up their point guard.

And Chicago needs to decent Shooting Guard.

Bigsmoke 07-29-2011 09:48 AM

Re: Bulls with LaMarcus Aldridge or Thunder with Tyson Chandler?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Unstoppabull
Bulls with Alridge. D-Rose gets a legit 2nd scoring option. Alridge was totally a breakout player this year, getting snubbed really elevated his level of play.

OKC with Chandler is no different than OKC with Perkins.

Both teams still have flaws though, OKC needs to smarten up their point guard.

And Chicago needs to decent Shooting Guard.


i agree with everything besides the Chandler part. Dude was the Mavs 2nd best player "at least to me" and would be the Thunder's 3rd best right now.

ThaSwagg3r 07-29-2011 09:58 AM

Re: Bulls with LaMarcus Aldridge or Thunder with Tyson Chandler?
 
Tyson Chandler is just a more athletic and mobile version of Kendrick Perkins. Chandler just does everything better but it's not like Perkins was terrible last season.

The Bulls adding Aldridge would be better in my opinion.

Aldridge is a different and much better player than Boozer. He adds more defense and scoring. Boozer is very close to a defensive liability. There were times in the ECF that the Bulls had to take out Boozer just because the Heat were purposely exploiting his pick n roll defense and it worked for Miami. Aldridge is one of the better defenders at that PF position. The only aspect that Boozer is better than Aldridge in is rebounding which is worthless since the Bulls already have a bunch of great rebounders.

Aldridge would have provided the 1st/2nd option scoring that Rose needed in the playoffs. Boozer did his scoring in the regular season but when the playoffs arrived the dude was no where to be found other than that Hawks series.

JohnnySic 07-29-2011 10:25 AM

Re: Bulls with LaMarcus Aldridge or Thunder with Tyson Chandler?
 
Perkins said he "dont like Chandler".

creepingdeath 07-29-2011 10:28 AM

Re: Bulls with LaMarcus Aldridge or Thunder with Tyson Chandler?
 
Aldridge would be a huge upgrade for the Bulls, while Chandler would be "only" a very good one.

HylianNightmare 07-29-2011 10:56 AM

Re: Bulls with LaMarcus Aldridge or Thunder with Tyson Chandler?
 
aldridge all day


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Terms of Use/Service | Privacy Policy