Message Board Basketball Forum - InsideHoops

Message Board Basketball Forum - InsideHoops (http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/index.php)
-   New York Knicks Forum (http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=13)
-   -   Frustrated Tyson Chandler questions future with Knicks (http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/showthread.php?t=327836)

insidehoops 03-04-2014 03:27 PM

Frustrated Tyson Chandler questions future with Knicks
 
With the Knicks in chaos, owner James Dolan is going to look to rebuild or reload at season’s end. Whether Chandler, who is starting to show signs of age, is part of the blueprints is unclear. And Chandler may not want to stick around either.

“That’s something I have to visit during the offseason,’’ Chandler said. “We’re all going to have a lot of decisions to make.’’

With his contract expiring in 2015, the Knicks could shop Chandler for draft picks and another asset. Chandler eagerly signed a free-agent four-year, $65 million contract in 2011, thinking he had a chance to win a second title.

-- NY Post

el gringos 03-04-2014 04:23 PM

Re: Frustrated Tyson Chandler questions future with Knicks
 
Bargnani > chandler @ C for the Knicks.


I wish chandler had as much value as so many on ish thinks he has.

smoovegittar 03-04-2014 04:32 PM

Re: Frustrated Tyson Chandler questions future with Knicks
 
Tyson Chandler has been absolute garbage this season... and his on/off court demeanor sucks as well. I think he's been intentionally tanking to get the coach canned - in my mind, that is despicable. I'll throw a party when I see this guy finally go.

bluechox2 03-04-2014 06:09 PM

Re: Frustrated Tyson Chandler questions future with Knicks
 
knicks following script...lower players value till they can only get peanuts...then sign to extension, then waive immediately

el gringos 03-04-2014 06:14 PM

Re: Frustrated Tyson Chandler questions future with Knicks
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bluechox2
knicks following script...lower players value till they can only get peanuts...then sign to extension, then waive immediately

And 80+ % here think they're doing the right thing. You were arguing with those few that spoke out about trading chandler or amare until way too late.


I can't figure out how they didn't try to get chandler to the lakers for pau. Sounds like la was wanting to take that huge money savings that all they wanted for pau was any asset. (Willing to take a late 1st). Chandler is still at least an asset isn't he?

knickscity 03-04-2014 06:54 PM

Re: Frustrated Tyson Chandler questions future with Knicks
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by el gringos
And 80+ % here think they're doing the right thing. You were arguing with those few that spoke out about trading chandler or amare until way too late.


I can't figure out how they didn't try to get chandler to the lakers for pau. Sounds like la was wanting to take that huge money savings that all they wanted for pau was any asset. (Willing to take a late 1st). Chandler is still at least an asset isn't he?

Was you watching how the Lakers were dealing with Phx...they wanted draft picks for Pau...not a player with another year on his deal.

pau expires this season...why on earth would they want Tyson for another season longer than pau?

el gringos 03-04-2014 09:57 PM

Re: Frustrated Tyson Chandler questions future with Knicks
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by knickscity
Was you watching how the Lakers were dealing with Phx...they wanted draft picks for Pau...not a player with another year on his deal.

pau expires this season...why on earth would they want Tyson for another season longer than pau?

It sounded like they were just as interested in cutting 5 mill off payroll and saving 15-20 mill in luxury tax to me. They were interested in a player not even playing but said they needed some type of asset.


Since they didn't trade him for anything you have to expect they'll bring him back.

knickscity 03-04-2014 11:02 PM

Re: Frustrated Tyson Chandler questions future with Knicks
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by el gringos
It sounded like they were just as interested in cutting 5 mill off payroll and saving 15-20 mill in luxury tax to me. They were interested in a player not even playing but said they needed some type of asset.


Since they didn't trade him for anything you have to expect they'll bring him back.

And when they do, wanna bet he doesnt make 14 mil like Tyson will next season?

smoovegittar 03-05-2014 06:47 PM

Re: Frustrated Tyson Chandler questions future with Knicks
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bluechox2
knicks following script...lower players value till they can only get peanuts...then sign to extension, then waive immediately


Interesting... I did not consider this.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Terms of Use/Service | Privacy Policy