2021 Western Conference Round 2: (1) Utah Jazz vs. (4) L.A. Clippers

[QUOTE=ArbitraryWater;14356168]Is Brogdon better than Westbrook or LaVine[/QUOTE]
You should specify prime WB. Xiao has a point about current WB tbh. Ask him Brogdon or 17 WB tho lmao

[QUOTE=RRR3;14356175]You should specify prime WB. Xiao has a point about current WB tbh. Ask him Brogdon or 17 WB tho lmao[/QUOTE]

sure, whatever. lavine does the trick also

Though they're great players, I hate how much Mitchell and Luka play as massive ballhogs.

jezuz why are you feeding Xiao

the dude will feel secure in his takes. He thinks Mitchell isnt top 3 on the JAZZ, he thinks Mitchell is worse than Brogdon which means he probably thinks Mitchell isnt a top 50 player LMAO.

[QUOTE=ArbitraryWater;14356211]jezuz why are you feeding Xiao

the dude will feel secure in his takes. He thinks Mitchell isnt top 3 on the JAZZ, he thinks Mitchell is worse than Brogdon which means he probably thinks Mitchell isnt a top 50 player LMAO.[/QUOTE]
Xiao is a crazy stan though, I can still have this view without going to extremes. At this point there is zero argument who the top 2 players on this team are. Conley isn't reliable enough (as usual) and everyone else is 1-2 levels below the top 3.

[QUOTE=RRR3;14356175]You should specify prime WB. Xiao has a point about current WB tbh. Ask him Brogdon or 17 WB tho lmao[/QUOTE]

any Westbrook. Big fan of BB IQ

[QUOTE=ArbitraryWater;14356198]sure, whatever. lavine does the trick also[/QUOTE]

Lavine is more comparable. Mitchell would be collecting ping pong balls as well if not for Gobert

[QUOTE=Xiao Yao You;14356218]Lavine is more comparable. Mitchell would be collecting ping pong balls as well if not for Gobert[/QUOTE]

Brogdon or LaVine

[QUOTE=hold this L;14356216]Xiao is a crazy stan though, I can still have this view without going to extremes. At this point there is zero argument who the top 2 players on this team are. Conley isn't reliable enough (as usual) and everyone else is 1-2 levels below the top 3.[/QUOTE]

two of the top players in the league were Gobert and Conley. Mitchell gets the hype.9-26 with 5 to's is reliable?

[QUOTE=Xiao Yao You;14356220][B]two of the top players in the league were Gobert and Conley[/B]. Mitchell gets the hype.9-26 with 5 to's is reliable?[/QUOTE]

I still don't understand your measure for "top players". Like...if you're top 50 are you a top player? In the top half of players in the league?

[QUOTE=ShawkFactory;14356252]I still don't understand your measure for "top players". Like...if you're top 50 are you a top player? In the top half of players in the league?[/QUOTE]
He thinks Rudy is top 10 on OFFENSE, so you can probably guess where he has him overall.

Mitchell is averaging 37/4/4 this series off 61% True Shooting, and you got Xiao here acting like he's not even a top 2 player on his team :facepalm

If Rudy scored more than 1 point in the first half last game, maybe Utah would be up 3-1

[QUOTE=Manny98;14356415]Mitchell is averaging 37/4/4 this series off 61% True Shooting, and you got Xiao here acting like he's not even a top 2 player on his team :facepalm

If Rudy scored more than 1 point in the first half last game, maybe Utah would be up 3-1[/QUOTE]
Mitchell has legit played like peak MJ the last two playoffs and Xiao still says he sucks :yaohappy:

MJ played D

Eric Walden: [URL="https://*********.com/social/"]Mike Conley is … surprise, surprise … QUESTIONABLE for Game 5[/URL].
– via [URL="https://twitter.com/tribjazz"]Twitter tribjazz[/URL]