Originally Posted by r15mohd
that's your point, OK. however it's still misleading as it insinuates the black % is the reasoning behind the detriment - detriment being an expense (in monetary) to society (tax payers). and why using the per capita format is wrong in this instance - as the overall premise is based on not total users, but their impact to the tax payer's pockets, which essentially is a dollar amount not a enrollment count.
No, not at all.
Again, just pointing out that while it may seem crazy that 40% of those in PR are on welfare, that's actually less than the percentage of blacks that use welfare here in the states.
Never said anything about monetary value. I don't even care.
I was just making a statement of fact. That's all. An equally shocking stat, apparently.