See, neither of these comments are true (IMO), so why talk like it's a fact and just your random opinion?
Doesn't that imply that it's my OPINION? Besides, if it is my opinion then to me it's pretty much a fact. Why would I spout of all that without believing it to be true?
I already posted both players stats as starters earlier in this thread. They showed Ford had comparable #'s in 10 less minutes per game. 10 minutes is a lot. I've said that Calderon is a better shooter but Ford is a better passer/playmaker (since you don't actually watch the games, I don't know how you can criticize any of this). Ford is also a far better defensive player. The injury is the only reason I can see people choosing Calderon over Ford. And that's fine, like I said it's a risk to keep Ford over Calderon because of this.
Do you even read entire posts or just pick out parts you don't like but ignore things that make sense?