i wouldnt be talking about coherent posts with your wikipedia links
As opposed to your wack websites? The ones that defend the Bible without actually quoting it? LOL
The Wikepidia references have a truckload of other references where they got the info from. Do you think they made all these discoveries themselves?
Here are just a few examples of your incoherence.
How about saying that i didn't answer 1% of your questions, when in fact you can't come up with one question that I haven't answered.
How about siting ancient fossil discoveries millions of years old as proof that evolution doesn't have all the answers and then trying to say the world is only 10,000 years old due to some study of the Earth's magnetic field.
Or trying to say that the current fossil record is bogus because of a Neanderthal skelton put together incorrectly 90 years ago.