Originally Posted by PejaNowitzki
Lee for 65 million is a bargain. Statistically the guy is on the same level as Stoudemire but 35 million cheaper, younger and without the injury issues. In a season of ridiculous idiotic spending(see Outlaw, Salmons and more), Lee is a true bargain.
Whether or not he'll be a good fit with the Warriors is something else altogether but I don't see the issue here.
The Warriors are about to be under new ownership, and the new owner is interested in WINNING. The run n gun days are about to be over... and we are going to sign a guy who thrives in the run n gun system to a 5 year deal?
Doesn't make any sense to me. In fact, it doesn't make sense that the current owner would be looking to sign ANY long term deals (without moving another long term deal like Monta or Biedrins) in the process of selling the team.