Thread: Camby > Amare
View Single Post
Old 01-23-2007, 01:19 AM   #32
Younggrease's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,673

Originally Posted by statman32
im sorry i misread your mumbo jumbo **** logic....its still the worst way to analyze players stats

oh and here are some of amares and cambys shooting stats from everything not under the basket

camby 60/161 37.2%
amare 50/134 37.3%

oh and heres their ft% since cambys range is so much better than amares

camby 70.7%
amare 77.9%

so amare actually has better range than camby i must say...weird...camby is nowhere near as good as amare on the offensive end if he doesnt even have better range than camby

so i guess range is measured by all shots not made under the basket???? Thats just dumb, and using ft percentage to support your claim is even worst
Younggrease is offline   Reply With Quote