Originally Posted by Clippersfan86
I just think the most logical explanation I can give you for the score inconsistencies from IGN is related to intangibles. For example.... they said 2K12 is better than 2K11 in every single way.... yet both got a 9.5 from IGN? See what I mean?
That doesn't solve my question, but rather perpetuates the problem I outlined already.
I'm not questioning their conclusion (or their articles), I am questioning their lack of consistency (or methodolgy) pertaining to quantitative measures regarding games.