Originally Posted by KyrieTheFuture
You could certainly make a good case for 2 but I always thought their greatest asset was the twin towers. Players 2-4 on that squad are separated by next to nothing in terms of importance.
i can see that too i guess. I just think we know pau kobe bynum is a fail, where as nash kobe pau might actually still be a great big 3. Or nash kobe bynum. But nash gasol bynum or kobe gasol bynum.. eh. So nash being 2nd makes sense t me