Originally Posted by lakerfreak
Okay he wasn't that bad....
I hate how every player on this team needs to be a superstar for the fan base to be satisfied.
We don't expect Blake to be a superstar, that is not the issue here, we expect him to at least be good at both ends of the floor......is he?
In fact how many current NBA 2nd string PGs is he better than?
Add in the fact that he makes $4 million a year which is double the rate for a comparable backup pg. Is he a better PG than our alternatives?
putting Blake at SG is
, he doesn't shoot that well and sure the hell can't guard a SG.