Originally Posted by JEFFERSON MONEY
The two major factors I can think up of, at t his moment, are
- availability of nutrient through its form
- and any other inhibitory ingredients within the food.
Otherwise they'd be the same.
Intuition would tell you that the potassium from a fruit
One of the reasons whole grains are criticized for is because they possess phytates which are "anti-nutirents'
Calcium and zinc don't cooperate
Copper and zinc don't cooperate
B vitamins require water to work
A/K/D need FAT to work
Trypsin (something in raw sweet potatoes) inhibit protein digestion
so if the funnyuns had an ingredient that were an antagonist to K than it wouldn't be so grand.
Also, most multivitamins are useless because the
cyanocobalmain (very very inefficient source of B12) vs (methylcobalamin) a highly potent one in the more expensive quality multis.
Zinc oxide/magnesium oxide vs. chelated zinc/chelated magensium.
What do you think about IIFYM diet?