Originally Posted by rufuspaul
Really stupid. All those other embassies had adequate (by bipartisan standards) security. There wasn't any fishy coverup in any of those instances. Let's keep comparing apples to oranges.
bipartisan? are you ****ing kidding me? The only reason that's even an issue is that a desperate political candidate tried to politicize Benghazi.
Even the Congressional hearings on this, the witnesses had to agree that all the disputed security measures were for Tripoli not Benghazi which are as far away as Brooklyn and Charlotte are.
They also had to agree that that the disputed security measures would not have deterred a coordinated attack this large.