Originally Posted by Go Getter
The last part more describes you.
You're looking back and saying we should have gotten a loser with no heart that didn't lead his team anywhere. Carter is known for being sofT. He was a good scorer in his prime but he did not contribute to WINNING BASKETBALL....you're still ass hurt over the Bulls not getting who you wanted apparently
What part of "at the time" do you not get? Im talking about how Carter was regarded in 2004. Like i stated, Rose may never regain the form that made him an MVP. Does that mean the Bulls made a bad decision in signing him because he would blow out his knee the following year? No one couldve predicted that was.gonna happen. Carter is known for being soft NOW, but he was regarded as a top player in 2004. Besides, he was only one of about 15 franchise players the Bulls couldve had in that list.